User talk:Ddaniel2009

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 15:49, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Sugababesnewlineup.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sugababesnewlineup.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:Diana Vickers
Template:Diana Vickers, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Diana Vickers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:Diana Vickers during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. I42 (talk) 18:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Diana Vickers
Template:Diana Vickers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. I42 (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jumping Into Rivers
A tag has been placed on Jumping Into Rivers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I42 (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Peter Andre
There really is no point adding a non-existent template Peter Andre to this article; it has been deleted. You are beginning to try my patience, since you are wasting my time in having to continually remove it. Please don't add it again. Rodhull andemu  17:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I see you've created it, although I couldn't say whether it will survive. Rodhull  andemu  17:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure it will. Peter Andre has had more singles out than enough to keep it open. --Ddaniel2009 (talk) 17:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ronnie featuring Heather.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ronnie featuring Heather.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Ddaniel2009. Thank you. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been. (blocked by –MuZemike 01:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

AfD nomination of G2L
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is G2L. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/G2L. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC)