User talk:Ddawg1993

The term "pseudo-science" is unfounded and a weak adjective to describe an exceptional scientist and author who holds a creationist belief. Sure, theories are predicated on creation, but that doesn't mean you can kick the scientist to the side. Richard Dawkins suggested in various interviews the human species may have originated from an alternate universe / alien transplant. Reference documentary, "No Intelligence Allowed", 2008. This claim is similar to other scientific claims that have 0 evidence. 0 evidence and inconclusive theories that famous scientists make don't chalk up to pseudo-science? Give me a break. It's hypocritical to use extreme bias when writing on subjects and people that don't have the same beliefs as secularists. Some biased editors will be responsible for the downfall of mankind and history as we know it. You all control history and have went rogue in thousands of instances. No master, guidelines or order. You all have no realization of the consequences of your actions, do you even consider future generations that reference these posts? You will mislead future generations and create a disillusioned society that will have to sift through dozens of Google search pages just for a hint of the truth. "What is truth"... Apparently, it's whatever you suits your narrative.