User talk:Ddcampayo

AfD nomination of List of computer and video games with female protagonists
List of computer and video games with female protagonists, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of computer and video games with female protagonists satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of computer and video games with female protagonists and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of List of computer and video games with female protagonists during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. VivioFa teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 09:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Capillary wave dispersion relation
I re-inserted an extended version of your derivation sketch, as a collapsible table in the "Derivation" section. Your improvements and comments are welcome. Crowsnest (talk) 21:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Beautiful derivation. Now, I am worried it may be too technical for some, but I love it. I will check some of the details when I have the time, I think the integration over x and y should be over their respective lambdas, but these are small details. Also, I wonder if one of the fluids may be neglected, for clarity, adding "the derivation for two fluids is easily extended from this case" or similar at the end. Best. --Daniel (talk) 08:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Physics participation
You received this message because your were on the old list of WikiProject Physics participants.

On 2008-06-25, the WikiProject Physics participant list was rewritten from scratch as a way to remove all inactive participants, and to facilitate the coordination of WikiProject Physics efforts. The list now contains more information, is easier to browse, is visually more appealing, and will be maintained up to date.

If you still are an active participant of WikiProject Physics, please add yourself to the current list of WikiProject Physics participants. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 14:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Capillary waves
Hello, I don't know in which project you are more active so I've asked at SklogWiki. Please have a look. Yrogirg (talk) 18:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Music
If the music appears somewhere then there needs to be a reliable source discussing it, like there is for the rest of the music.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  19:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I'll try to come up with something. --Daniel (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space
Hey there Ddcampayo, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Ddcampayo/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of images removed today here


 * Shut off the bot here


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 02:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Lorentz transformation, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 13:03, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Dead DVdm, it indeed seems I failed in providing the reference, a book by Stauffer and Eugene_Stanley. I will propose the new derivation in the discussion section, as you suggest. Thanks. --Daniel (talk) 15:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Proposed derivation for the Lorentz transformations


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Proposed derivation for the Lorentz transformations. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Lorentz transformations. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Lorentz transformations - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 15:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Please, delete that page - I would do it myself if I could (which I think is the case). I created it by mistake, it was intended to be in my sandbox, as a proposal for a section of Lorentz transformation. Best, --Daniel (talk) 19:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Taken over
Daniel, I have taken over the draft to the article now. Cheers! - DVdm (talk) 08:01, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Speedy deletion nomination of Stiffened equation of state


A tag has been placed on Stiffened equation of state requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sklogwiki.org/SklogWiki/index.php/Stiffened_equation_of_state. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:22, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cole equation of state


A tag has been placed on Cole equation of state requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.sklogwiki.org/SklogWiki/index.php/Cole_equation_of_state. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Chords
The chord section is not very accurate, to put it mildly. First: chord notation is wrong, should be I-ii-V, distinguising major and minor chords. Song structure is too simple: it features verses, pre-choruses, bridges, and chorus. Also, the description is unsupported and may be original work. I plan to correct it along e.g. https://tabs.ultimate-guitar.com/tab/keane/somewhere-only-we-know-chords-1871714 Daniel (talk) 19:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)