User talk:Ddeepakkmishra

September 2017
Hello, I'm ThePlatypusofDoom. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Kurti top— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 13:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: LemonBloom (September 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LemonBloom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:LemonBloom Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:LemonBloom reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   14:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister  talk  18:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lemonbloom


A tag has been placed on Lemonbloom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Slashme (talk) 20:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Pure RED &#124; talk to me  &#124; 20:37, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lemonbloom


A tag has been placed on Lemonbloom, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I am perfectly willing that you initially came to Wikipedia in good faith, believing that posting advertising material would be acceptable. However, when you have repeatedly been told by more than one editor that that is not so, and have repeatedly seen pages you created deleted for that reason, you can no longer be under that mistaken impression, and you are knowingly defying Wikipedia policy. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

i am here to show you how all of editors are working for money you required money from big seo firms and creating their pages, look there are lots of issue regarding wikipedia editors who are playing games for money , i can show you hundreads of pages like mine page which is approved but mine page is not passed cause money is the big issue , and what the hell is good faith there are lots of big SEO firms plyaing games with wiki, dont try to teach me the good faith i am aware of all this black game.

HOW MUCH MONEY YOU ALL EDITOR NEED TO APPROVE A PAGE THIS IS UNETHICAL GAME GOING ON WIKI AND YOU KNOW IN INDIA THERE IS STRICT LAW IN COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA THAT BIG COMPANY LIKE YOURS, IN WHICH HAND YOU ARE PLAYING , IS NOT ABLE TO PRESSURISE, I KNOW MANY BIG COMPANIES PAYING HUGE AMOUNT TO EDITORS FOR NOT APPROVING COMPETITORS PAGE YOU ALL EDITORS MADE THE WIKI A CORRUPTION GROUND WHERE MONEY IS EVERYTHING , HOW IT COULD BE POSSIBLE THAT MANY OTHER PAGES LIKE MINE IS APPROVED AND MINE IS NOT , BIG SEO COMPANIES OR OTHER COMPANIES PAYING SOME BREADS TO YOU AND YOU ARE HERE FOR THEIR DUTY, BE A EDITOR AND DOING DEALERSHIP OF BIG COMPANIES , I AM NOT GOING TO KEEP QUITE WILL RAISE THIS ISSUE AT EVERY PLATFORM, AND MY PAGE NEED TO BE HERE ON WIKI

Speedy deletion nomination of LEMONBLOOM


A tag has been placed on LEMONBLOOM, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

YOU ALL ARE CORRUPT TAKING MONEY FROM OTHER COMPANIES TO CREATE PAGE, I WILL PUT THE CONTAIN TO ALL SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM TO SHOW HOW YOU PEOPLE ARE UNBIASED AND CREATING UNETHICAL AND ILLEGAL PRACTISE , THERE ARE MANY SITES AS MINE WHICH IS ON WIKI BUT I WILL SUBMIT ALL THE DATA TO EVERY GOVERNMENT WILL NOT KEEP QUITE ON THIS MATTER THIS IS A HUGE LEVEL CORRUPTION GOING ON WIKI AND MAXIMUM OF EDITORS ARE TROLLERS.