User talk:Ddonovan350

Spam in Vehicles into which the GM LS engine has been transplanted
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Vehicles into which the GM LS engine has been transplanted, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Vehicles into which the GM LS engine has been transplanted is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Vehicles into which the GM LS engine has been transplanted, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vehicles into which the GM LS engine has been transplanted
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vehicles into which the GM LS engine has been transplanted, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Pointless list. References are blogs and youtube videos.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cycle~ (talk) 01:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Please do not simply re-submit material without addressing issues. Your rationale of "Explain how this is even REMOTELY advertising" is not suitable.  I suggest you take this matter up with one of the admins who have deleted the article, or Blanchardb who has tagged this current article for proposed deletion.  Cycle~ (talk) 01:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page GM LS engine has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9s6kz9xib0u, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5id5top-s4, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ganbxgid5xw, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gw7hn7fmz-o, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogt7yq5xfko). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)