User talk:DeAna Fai

Your draft article, Draft:DeAna Fai


Hello, DeAna Fai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DeAna Fai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

DeAna Fai moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, DeAna Fai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Ravensfire  (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * There are a couple of issues that need to be mentioned here. The biggest is that this appears to be an article about yourself, based on your user name.  Autobiographies are strongly discouraged on Wikipedia as a clear example of conflict-of-interest editing. As that link article on autobiographies notes, it's challenging for a person to produce and neutral article about themself with only information that's verifiable.  Quite a bit of the article was unsourced and I removed it prior to moving the article to draft space.  There was also a fair number of places where the text was not neutral and more promotional in tone.  That's great for a personal website about yourself, but not so great for a Wikipedia article. Both of those issues are still found in the draft. The article requires a fair amount of work to bring it up to shape where it could be accepted.  Ravensfire  (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)