User talk:DeStijl1

Hi. Thanks for experimenting with the page Pornography on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Hbackman 02:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 02:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BrokenSegue 02:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Octagon-warning.png|left|40px]] You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 24 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --P e ruvianLlama(spit) 02:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

I just received your email stating that you wanted to discuss your block. Feel free to do so here. Cheers. --P e ruvianLlama(spit) 03:52, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Yea why'd I get blocked? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeStijl1 (talk • contribs)


 * Ah, yes. Well, have a look at your edits from February 10th:, , , , , , , , , and , all of which qualify as vandalism. Wikipedia has a policy that users who repeatedly vandalize, despite being asked not to do so (see the warnings at the top of this talk page), are eligible to be blocked. So that's sort of the general answer to your question - is there anything more specific about why you were blocked that you wanted to know? --P e ruvianLlama(spit) 05:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes. Why are 3-10 classified as vandalism. I understand 1-2...but not the rest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeStijl1 (talk • contribs)


 * In several of the edits from 3-10 you removed legitimate, factual content, and replaced it with some variation of "Matt is cool". In the rest of the edits, you didn't erase anything but still added some variation of the same. I think it's fairly clear that content like this doesn't belong in an encyclopaedia. Have a look at what Wikipedia is not for more background on what is suitable material for inclusion, and Wikipedia's Welcome to Newcomers for more info on contributing in general. Cheers. --P e ruvianLlama(spit) 06:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Learn how to spell "encyclopedia." —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeStijl1 (talk • contribs)

Removal of warnings
Please don't remove warnings from your talk page. It is against Wikipedia policy and can get you blocked again. Please don't edit other users' comments (as you edited Peruvianllama's); it is considered vandalism. Also, "encyclopaedia" is the correct British spelling of "encyclopedia." (Though I do agree that it's a weird way to spell it. ;) Nevertheless, please refrain from insults.) Thank you. Hbackman 01:23, 13 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I want to add: It looks like your edits to Wikipedia since returning from your block have all been truly constructive. Thank you. :) And welcome to Wikipedia. Hbackman 01:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)