User talk:DeTru711

Welcome to Wikipedia
Mushroom (Talk) 01:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Acid3

 * Hi, you reverted my edit of Acid3 Saying in the comments that Chrome isn't a current release and didn't pass acid3... so I double checked and yes it's a preview release,, but it Definitely passed Acid3, look at the screenshot I uploaded,, I did the test myself,, and lots of people did. will you be ok that we mention it passed in the preview release? Koraiem (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * lol.. alright, I can't honestly remember if I had the default settings when I made the test.. but yet the pink dot's there.. anyway, the photo's still on commons, whenever someon's sure of it we'll put it! :D.. Thanks! Koraiem (talk) 01:55, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Replied to FF version discussion
Link here. Avindra talk / contribs 01:49, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Replied again. Avindra talk / contribs 15:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied reaction: Safari dev version
Hello, I replied on your reaction about the Safari dev versions see my talk page Youp.c (talk) 21:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Removed, see below - SudoGhost 03:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to see you leave, but I don't really think SudoGhost was right either to use a template message on you.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is apparently ruled by trolls who change the facts for making their cause. If they succeed (and it seems they did) it means that my job here ends. --DeTru711 (talk) 03:05, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you have that impression of Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be censored, and is supposed to be a friendly community. Wikipedia isn't about winning either (WP:WIN). The key to all this is discussion. It seems you were engaged in an edit war on the Acid3 article, which then induced others to keep reverting you. But if you use the talk page of the article to discuss, you have better chances of getting your information in. No-one should be trolling or censoring anything.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I removed the uw-disruptive template. See my talk page. - SudoGhost 03:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)