User talk:De Administrando Imperio/Archive 6

2008 South Ossetia War Stuff
Hey, I've noticed that the title of the previous article is 1991-1992 South Ossetia War. I'm just curious, since you've worked on that article - when did that title come up? Was it before or after August 2008? Do you remember at all? HistoricWarrior007 (talk) 06:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Krajina Towns Again
Hi there. If you remember some time ago there was an issue with the Krajina town catory. We have yet another problem and another vote as some Croats are not happy with this topic existing. Please add a vote or some input. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Towns_in_the_Former_RSK Thanks. (LAz17 (talk) 19:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC))

Agree merge
I totally argree to merge. The Template:Campaignbox Iraq War battles should be deleted and transfer everything from there to Template:Campaignbox Iraq War, like many other war temples. 207.233.67.8 (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Da te pitam, sto se slazes sa ovim cudakom 207.233.67.8, koji je zadnja dva meseca non-stop brisao Campaignbox Iraq War bez diskusije, pod razlicitim ip adresama stavise da bi izgledalo da vise njih hoce da promeni? Ovo sto cu ti sad reci sve sam rekao vec na stranici za diskusije kutijice. Ti si licno sa mnom i jos nekoliko korisnika izplanirao i konstruisao ovu kutijicu pre skoro dve godine. Sto hoces sad da je brises? Argument ti je a i ovom drugom liku, ali ja licno mislim da se on uhvatio za taj izgovor posto si ga ti izneo, da sve to sto je tu vec je u ovom drugom template. Cuj, mi smo se slozili da je Campaignbox Iraq War battles postajao prevelik, i molim te ne daj mi primer kutijice u Vijetnamskom ratu ne slazem se ni sa velicinom tog. Sad je Campaignbox Iraq War battles jos veci nego sto je bio. Ovako imamo lepo jednu kutijicu koja povezuje lepo direktno ka listi bitaka a i listi bombaskih napada, plus veza za invaziju, gradjanski rat i gerilu. Ako uklonimo ovu kutijicu onda ce svuda da bude samo kutijica sa listom bitaka (koja je bas dzombasta i zauzimace nepotrebno prostor u clancima), a za listu bombaskih napada bi morali ljudi da idu na kraj clanka Iracki rat da pogledaju u onom template-u pri dnu da nadju link za bombaske napade, bolje ovako gde je pri pocetku. Istu ovakvu kutijicu koriste i Sri Lankanskom gradjanskom ratu i niko nema problem sa njom?89.216.236.45 (talk) 12:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * pa sada mislim da vise nije potrebna, zato sam samo pokrenuo diskusiju. Ako se vise njih usprotivi onda nista od toga.. Nemoj me osudjivati jer nisam nista jos redirektovao niti neću ako se nitko još ne javi (od korisnika) --TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 13:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Uzgred, sto si izbacio Kolumbijski rat iz kutijice WoT. Pa jesam li te ja licno pitao pre nego sto sam ga ubacio da li da ga dodamo jer su FARC i ostali komunisticki gerilci zavedeni kao teroristi od strane Amerikanaca i pokazao sam ti reference koje dokazuju da su nakon 9/11 uvecali vojne posiljke, transfer novca i vojni trening vladi Kolumbije. Ti si se slozio sa mnom. Sta je bilo?89.216.236.45 (talk) 12:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Pogledao sam clanak, i kao sto sam naveo odavno na str. za razgovor te kutijice, treba prije to pitanje biti rijeseno na pojedinim stranicama. Reći da je dio WoT zbog vojnih pošiljka je WP:OR. Šta, ćemo i rat u Gruziji onda dodati u tu kutijicu? Zato što Rusija podržava Iran a Iran onda Hezbolah, a Gruzija dobila američke HMMWV i obuku. Ne postoji nikakav "OEF-Colombia" i taj rat traje vec 40 god. Pokreni slobodno diskusiju, mogu i ja za tebe ako mislis drzati low profile--TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 13:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * po tvojoj logici bi trebali ubacit onda i Turkey-PKK conflict--TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 13:48, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Cuj, nema potrebe da se nista sada ljutis, nisam mislio nista lose, pitao sam te jer pre nego sto sam ranije bio ubacio Kolumbiju u kutijicu pitao sam te da li se slazes sa mnom da treba staviti Kolumbiju i ti si se slozio sa mnom. A sto se tice iracke kutijice ponovo ti kazem bolje da ovako imamo jednu kutijicu koja moze da pruza link i za borbe i za bombaske napade i lepo da se nalazi na pocetku clanka Iracki rat, ovako jedino ce biti kutijica sa borbama. Ne razumem sto mi sada pretis da hoces da pokrenes diskusiju sto se tice mene jer se ne slazes sa mojim misljenjem. Sta sam ja tebi skrivio?89.216.236.45 (talk) 15:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ma ne protiv tebe, diskusiju u vezi kolumbije--TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 15:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * E, to je vec nesto drugo. Pardon, izvinjavam se iskreno, nesporazum. U bilo kom slucaju evo ti one reference [][][][]89.216.236.45 (talk) 19:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Article moved to Hargeisa–Bosaso bombings
Hi there, I moved your article to the above name, however looking into it that may not have been the right decision. Apologies if I've caused any problems -- you're of course welcome to revert that move if you think it appropriate. -- Deadly&forall;ssassin 13:34, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Earthquakes Newsletter
Be sure to check out the October version of the WikiProject Earthquakes Newsletter for updates and news. Thanks, &mdash;  Ceranthor   ( Sing ) 23:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Datumi Irackog rata
Vidi ako mozes umesto mene da ubacis u Infobox Irackog rata pod date (datum) sledece:


 * date=
 * Invasion: March 20, 2003 — May 1, 2003
 * Insurgency: May 2, 2003 — May 11, 2008
 * Localised sporadic fighting: May 12, 2008 — Present

Iskoristi reference koje sam ubacio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.236.45 (talk) 06:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Answer
Hi,

It’s nice to hear that my articles are useful to someone. Unfortunately, I had to stop working on this topic for different reasons. You’re doing a great work. If you’re interested, I can be helpful in finding sources regarding Russian aircraft losses in Afghanistan and during both Chechen wars, just contact me in Russian Wikipedia. Also let me know if you have some other ideas.

Creo11 (talk) a.k.a. Deerhunter —Preceding undated comment was added at 07:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC).

3rr
Please make sure you're aware of the 3rr rule. You seem to be engaging in an edit war at the Iraq War page--68.251.188.63 (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

No original analysis
Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. This means that Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own opinions, experiences, or arguments.

There has been a discussion about this on the article's talk page and you seem to have completely ignored it.--68.251.188.63 (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Iraq Lancet survey
Pokrenuo sam raspravu na discussion page Iraq war da se ukloni Lancet-ova procena broja poginulih u ratu koja govori da je prve tri godine poginulo 655,000 ljudi, 1 osoba u 40 bi to znacilo da je poginulo u Iraku. U zadnjih par godina vise vlada (ukljucujuci i Iraka) i vise analiticara je diskreditovala tu procenu. Moje licno misljenje je da Amerikanci i iracka vlada pokusavaju da umanje pravi broj poginulih, ali ovaj broj od 655,000 je prosto PRETERAN. Kako god, stavio sam par linkova u raspravu da ko hoce pogleda ko se sve suprotstavio ovoj proceni. Za to sam da se broj ukloni iz infobox-a i zameni sa brojem Iraq Body Count Group. Ali da se i dalje u clanku pomene procena Lancet-a, ako treba i cela posebna sekcija za taj broj i kontraverziju oko toga uradi. Ali tom broju nije mesto u infobox-u. Neki su pomenuli cak da je broj bio namesten zbog politicke motivacije. Ako taj broj ostane u infobox-u to bi znacilo da bi trebali u infobox Drugog svetskog rata da pomenemo i procenu danasnjih nacistickih grupa da je svega par stotina Jevreja poginulo tokom rata (sto je cisti debilizam). Vikipedija treba da ostane neutralna, ali sta vise i REALISTICNA. Iznesi svoje misljenje tamo ako hoces. Poz.89.216.236.45 (talk) 23:41, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Napravi kako hoces. Ja nisam siguran. Ako je u BiH u četiri godine poginulo 200,000 ljudi, meni izgleda moguće da je u 7 god. u Iraku 600,000. Znas oni masakri, bombaski napadi...svakog dana 200-300 ljudi a bitke da ne pričam. Šijitske i Sunitske milicije su izvodile teške masakre o kojima se ne zna mnogo, nego su samo nadjene masovne grobnice. Bilo je i cak 700 na dan --TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 09:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Taj izvestaj nije sad bio napravljen nego sredinom 2006., to znaci 655,000 za tri godine ne sedam. Manje nego sto je trajao rat u Bosni, a tri puta vise poginulih. Zato mi je malo sumnjivo. Da je ove godine uradjen taj izvestaj i poverovao bih, ali ovako mi se stvarno ne cini mogucim. Po njima bi znacilo da je ginulo u proseku na dan za te tri godine 600 ljudi. Priznajem, onaj jedan primer koji si dao pokazuje da je 700 ljudi poginulo u jednom danu, ali to je samo zato sto je ona bomba bila sravnila sa zemljom ceo onaj gradic. Antiwar.com npr (koji optuzuju da preuvelicava broj zrtava) nikada nije vise od 200-300 ljudi prijavio da je u jednom danu poginulo, to je bio maksimum koji bi prijavili. A bilo je i dana kada nije poginulo vise od 50 ljudi. A i utvrdjeno je da je 10,500 pripadnika snaga bezbednosti poginulo zajedno sa bar 23,000 gerilaca, opet po njima bi bilo da je 622,000 bilo civila, opet mi je prosto nemoguce. 200,000 koji su poginuli u Bosni takodje nisu svi bili civili, bilo je tu i vojnika, para-vojnika, milicije itd. Uvrh glave je bar eto mozda 20,000-30,000 boraca bilo medju mrtvima tamo i to minimum.89.216.236.45 (talk) 16:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Tek sam sad usao u problematiku, kaze 31% of those were attributed to the Coalition, 24% to others, 46% unknown. 46% bi bilo oko 300,000 mrtvih iz nepoznatih razloga, sto moze biti glad, kriminal, bolesti, rušenje mosta u Bagdadu 2005. ako se sjećaš, to je uvećani mortalitet. To bi značilo da je oko 190,000 ljudi ubijeno od koalicije, a oko 140,000 od drugih (militanti), što je ukupan baš ratni broj poginulih ~330,000 --TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 17:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * ups, možda ne. kaze 56 % gunshot to bi znacilo oko 380,000 ukupno poginulih od vatrenog oruzja. Neznam vise...--TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 17:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Upravo si rekao ono o cemu pricam, oni su stavili broj svih ljudi koji su umrli u Iraku od pocetka rata i to ne samo one koji su umrli usled rata nego su zabelezili i svaku mogucu osobu koja je dobila infarkt, pala sa drveta ili bila u saobracajci. A trebali bi da zabeleze samo broj poginulih usled samog rata, neka je i kriminal i bolesti razlog i to je rezultat rata, ali zar sad i ljude koji su umirali u nesrecnim slucajevima?89.216.236.45 (talk) 19:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

In the News!
I feel like I've cheated you though, as you updated it a lot. Oh, and I moved it to 2008 Nord-Kivu conflict, if you don't mind. Cheers, Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :)  06:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Jos malo sam zaboravio, ti si iz Hrvatske? Kako ovo nisam znao prije? :) Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :)  06:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * sad znaš :)--TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 12:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Nalchik2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Nalchik2005.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 18:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Battle of the forward defence lines
Vidi da promenis naziv Battle of the forward defence lines u 2008 SLA Northern offensive kao sto smo pricali. Poz. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.236.45 (talk) 20:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Goma
Why'd you remove this? Also, mind if I move the page to 2008 Nord-Kivu war, as that is what it is? Or perhaps move Kivu conflict to Kivu war and then move the Nord-Kivu one to conflict? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D  10:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * It is sourced later in the article. As for fighting, it doesn't sound right; conflict best describes the situation. I've moved Kivu conflict to Kivu war. Is it ok if I move 2008 Nord-Kivu fighting to 2008 Nord-Kivu conflict? This conflict is the major part of the war, after all. Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :D  10:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Internal conflict in Burma, Colombian armed conflict (1964–present), Turkey–Kurdistan Workers Party conflict, Casamance Conflict, Balochistan conflict, Iran–Party for a Free Life in Kurdistan conflict. Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :D  10:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * They both mean essentially the same thing; however, Arab–Israeli conflict handles it by calling the main one a conflict and the branch-off a war. Should I rename 2008 Nord-Kivu fighting to Nord-Kivu war? Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :D  10:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL do what you want... that decisions are usually not made on my talk page but on the article's...I don't have the time and will for that...I'm leaving wikipedia (not because of this discussion, but this is a good catalyst). HaHa Now you want to have two wars one inside another... I wan't participate in such a wikipedia, don't take it personally.--TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 10:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, well, it was nice editing with you! See ya later, Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! :D  10:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Please explain
Hi. At Talk:November 2008 Mumbai attacks you opposed User:Cerejota's move proposal, stating "Oppose per cerejota". Cerjota was trying to get the page moved. Is there some sort of confusion? -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 04:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Zrtve u Mumbaiju
Imam molbu za tebe, posto je blokiran trenutno November 2008 Mumbai attacks da ne mogu ne-registrovani korisnici da edituju, da li bi mogao da umesto mene zamenis celu sekciju za Casualties sa sledecim tekstom koji cu da ti ostavim ovde, ovaj koji je uradjen u glavnom clanku je totalno poremecen i netacan, uradio sam poprilicno tacan i azuriran u clanku List of victims of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks:

At least 174 people had been killed in the attacks and 247 wounded. Among the dead were 124 Indian civilians, 17 policemen and 33 foreigners. The breakdown of the foreigners was as follows: four Americans, four Australians, five Israelis, three Germans, two Israeli-Americans, two Canadians, two French, one Briton, one Chinese, one Italian, one Japanese, one Jordanian, one Malaysian, one Mauritian, one Mexican, one Singaporean, one Spaniard and one Thai. In addition, nine terrorists were killed and one was captured. According to British High Commissioner in India, Sir Richard Stagg, seven Britons had been injured in the terror strikes and one dead. Andreas Liveras, a British yachting tycoon, was among those confirmed killed. 21 other foreigners of different nationalities were injured in the terror strikes and were admitted to the Bombay Hospital. Hospital sources said the injured foreigners were from Australia, USA, Canada, Germany, Canada, Spain, Norway, Finland, Oman, China, Japan, the Philippines and Jordan. According to Maharashtra chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh, 14 policemen and three NSG commandos were killed, including the following officers: Three railway officials of Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus had also been killed in the terror strikes.
 * Mumbai Anti-Terrorism Squad Chief Hemant Karkare, who headed the team investigating the politically sensitive 2006 Malegaon blasts. Karkare had also been receiving death threats recently, including a threat to bomb his residence, but it is unclear if these were related to his death.
 * Additional Commissioner of Police: Ashok Kamte
 * Encounter specialist: Vijay Salaskar
 * Senior inspector Shashank Shinde, who had recently been involved in investigating many of India's recent bombings.
 * NSG Commando, Major Sandeep Unnikrishnan
 * NSG Commando Hawaldar Chandar
 * NSG Commando Gajendra Singh

The Government of Maharashtra announced Rs. 5 lakh (about 10,000 USD) compensation to the kin of those killed in the terror attacks and Rs. 50,000 (about 1,000 USD) to the seriously injured.

Nema potrebe
E nema potrebe otkljucali clanak.89.216.236.45 (talk) 12:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:2008_Chechnya_earthquake.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:2008_Chechnya_earthquake.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:53, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Somalija
Hej, primetio sam da si prestao da editujes 2008 timeline of the War in Somalia, sta je bilo?89.216.236.45 (talk) 01:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * neda mi se, a i nemam baš vremena--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 09:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

2007–2008_Israel-Gaza_conflict
Talk:2007–2008_Israel-Gaza_conflict since you also have doen some attemps to bring rationality to this disjointed collection fo article, I though I'll let you know. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 03:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

survey
Hey this discussion will interest you Talk:Syrian occupation of Lebanon, can you please read it and vote.George Al-Shami (talk) 22:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Alois Irlmaier
A tag has been placed on Alois Irlmaier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

2008 South Ossetia war title vote
Since you were involved in the previous rename discussion, maybe you would be interested: there is a vote up again at Talk:2008 South Ossetia war. Offliner (talk) 22:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

American Forces casualties in the war in Afghanistan
Zapoceli su debatu ovde Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history u vezi toga da li je ovaj clanak koji sam sastavio potreban. Ja sam im rekao da sam iz clanka Coalition casualties in Afghanistan koji je vec imao sva ta imena vojnika i okolnosti njihvoih smrti samo preneo u zaseban clanak da ne bi bi veci. Takodje sam i u ovaj clanak ukljucio na samo vojnik koji poginuli iskljucivo u Avganistanu nego i one koji poginuli u drugim zemljama dok su podrzavali operacije u Avganistanu. Broj ne ukljucuje vojnike poginule u Africi, Jugoistocnoj Aziji i na Kubi, samo Arapski svet. Ali pricaju da krsi pravilo u vezi toga da clanci ne treba da budu memorijali. Ja sam im predlozio u tom slucaju da obrisemo sva imena vojnika koji su poginuli u samom Avganistanu, ali ostavimo imena 28 koji poginuli u drugim zemljama ali kao rezultat rata u Avganistanu. Takodje jedan od razloga sto sam uradio clanak jeste jer Coalition casualties in Afghanistan je bazirao svoj broj 601 na broju koji je DoD davao na svom sajtu koliko je vojnika poginulo u samom Avganistanu, Pakistanu i Uzbekistanu, ali icasualties.org je izlistao imena 608 vojnika koji su poginuli u Avganistanu, Pakistanu i Uzbekistanu. A svi ti su potvrdjeni od strane DoD-a drugim recima pogresan broj, za sedam manje, su prikazivali na svom sajtu. Ja sam ih pitao sto prave toliku frku oko toga a nisu dok je spisak imena bio u Coalition casualties in Afghanistan, a i rekao sam im da vec postoje liste kanadskih, australijskih, britanskih i nemackih vojnika. Mislim da jedini razlog sto nisu imenovali clanak za brisanje nego pokrenuli debatu jeste zbog korisnika koji edituju ove druge spiskove. Doslo bi do sukoba interesa. Ako hoces da se ukljucis u raspravu dobrodosao.BobaFett85 (talk) 01:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * mogu samo nominirati na brisanje. ne mogu brisati pola straniceAko nominiraju javi --<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 12:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Nominovali su ga za brisanje. Bar jos dva editora se slazu u vezi clanka samnom i vec sam ih obavestio. Tvoja pomoc bi isto dobro dosla. Ovde je diskusija Articles for deletion/American Forces casualties in the war in Afghanistan.BobaFett85 (talk) 10:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ma znam da je zamaranje. Iskreno, stvarno me zabole za poginule Amerikance. Jedini razlog sto sam uradio clanak jeste jer su non-stop umetali broj koji DoD daje, koji je za sedam manji od icasualties.org (ne racunajuci one poginule u Africi i Jugoistocnoj Aziji). Pokusavao sam da im skrenem paznju da je taj broj koji icasualties.org daje baziran na imenima koje je sam DoD dao, ali opet nisu hteli da me slusaju, pa ako ista iz inata sam ovo uradio da ne mogu da kazu da je samo DoD u pravu. Ali, u glavnom sam se orijentisao da radim spisak avganistanskih vojnika i uradio sam sad skoro i talibanski spisak. Iracke gerilce i snage bezbednosti sam uglavnom prestao jer se rat privodi kraju i nema toliko mnogo akcije vise, s vremena na vreme malo azuriram njihove spiske, ali su uglavnom onako kako treba da budu.BobaFett85 (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

LRA
Please see Lord's Resistance Army#Merger_proposal and RSVP there if you object. --Ezeu (talk) 01:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Malo veca molba, oprostaj od Vikipedije i upoznavanje
Vidi ako mozes umesto mene s vremena na vreme da apdejtujes, kad imas vremena, nisi zauzet i stignes, ova dva artikla Coalition casualties in Afghanistan i United States Forces casualties in the war in Afghanistan. Provalili me genijalci najzad posle sest meseci ko sam pa sad drze pod prismotrom u zasedi ta dva artikla i ne mogu da im pridjem, radim na par drugih trenutno koje ne drze pod prismotrom. Samo da ti skrenem paznju da u United States Forces casualties in the war in Afghanistan se apdejtuju dva broja, broj koji daje DoD i broj koji daje iCasualties.org, to je bilo resenje one diskusije kad su pretili da ga obrisu. Ja sam uradio neke apdejte na ta dva artikla skoro ali me ovaj jedan lik revertovao kad otkrio ko sam i revert mu je unazadio United States..., a poremetio malo Coalition casualties..., pa zato ti pogledaj sta je on sve revertovao pa na osnovu toga kako ti odlucis vidi sta ces da vratis a sta neces da vratis, ali narocito mislim da bi trebao da izbacis iz Coalition casualties... detalje o poginulim Estonijskim i Korejanskim vojnicima posto ih je malo poginulo pa samo zauzimaju prostor, svi drugi detalji govore iskljucivo o trupama koje su pretrpele vise od 5 poginulih.

Jos jedna stvar, konacno sam nasao reference za tacne brojeve poginulih u ratu u Pakistanu i dosta sam edita uradio i poubaciovao reference, ali su zapoceli sad istragu ip adrese koju sam koristio i u editovanju tog artikla pa se stvaarno bojim da ce revertovati i sve ponistiti pa ako mozes da vidis u slucaju da ako poizbacuju sve sto sam stavio da kasnije ponovo ubacis da budu tacni brojevi poginulih, a ako jos ne budu bili revertovali dok ti budes citao ovu poruku uradi neki edit u tom clanku pa nece moci posle da revertuju.

Nadam se da ces mi pomoci oko ovoga, bio ja kriv ili ne po njihovim pravilima, to im ne daje pravo da izbacuju dobre reference i ponistavaju dobre edite. Sve ovo me nateralo da razmisljam i prosto ne zelim vise ovoliko da se masiram s njima pa cu pokusati da se odviknem od svega ovoga i batalim najvecim delom Vikipediju kao sto si i ti. Uzgred, nikad te ne pitah, kako se zoves? Ja sam Djordje. 188.2.194.191 (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.2.194.124 (talk)
 * David. Ne znam dal cu stici to napraviti--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 01:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Savjet: veoma si produktivan, napravi kakvu samostalnu web-stranicu--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 01:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Drago mi je Davide i hvala na predlogu mozda cu da vidim i uradim nesto po tom pitanju jednom kad ne budem bio previse zauzet. Vala u zadnje vreme mi stvarno dojadili ovi sa Vikipedije i nemam vise zivaca da se prepirem sa njima. Ti si stvarno uradio pametnu stvar sto si presekao u korenu celu ovu stvar i radis samo desetak edita nedeljno kad si u prolazu.188.2.194.124 (talk) 02:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Vergarolla tragedy\explosion
Hi TheFEARgod, would you join the discussion about this topic? Thanks anticipately, --Emanuele Mastrangelo (talk) 09:44, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

2008-2009 SLA offensive
Vidi ako mozes umesto mene u zadnjoj sekciji bitke da napises nesto malo o smrti vodje Tigrova jutros i ubaci ponovo reference za brojeve poginulih ako ih je onaj Nik koji me konstantno ganja izbacio. Vidi sta je on izbacio pa sta mislis da treba ti ubaci ako hoces. Poz!188.2.194.99 (talk) 10:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shira Utfila
A tag has been placed on Shira Utfila requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Passportguy (talk) 21:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Copied from talk page of deleted article:

2 ext. links given, there is also a discography!--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 21:38, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * whether or not the band exists, is not the issue. The band must be notable, per policy stated at WP:BAND in order to be included here. In a nutshell, this means that it must be famous and have multiple albums published by a major record lable. If they have, please add this information to the article with reliable sourced to back this up. Myspace and private band pages are unfortunately not considered reliable sources. Passportguy (talk) 21:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * you were quicker than me mr. speedydeleter--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 08:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Operation Black thunderstorm
Slazem se s tobom u vezi onoga sto si rekao za brojeve poginulih. Stavi u artikl u Casualties sekciju i u infobox da su to sve Military claim. Ja bih ali ce onaj Nick ponovo da me ganja i revertuje.188.2.194.71 (talk) 16:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:2001 macedonia police.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:2001 macedonia police.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:10, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Editing survey
Hi TheFEARgod. My name is Mike Lyons and I am a doctoral student at Indiana University in the United States. I am conducting research on the writing and editing of high traffic current events articles on Wikipedia. I have noticed in the talk page archives at 2008 South Ossetia war that you have contributed to the editing and maintenance of the article. I was hoping you would agree to fill out a brief survey about your experience. This study aims to help expand our thinking about collaborative knowledge production. Believe me I share your likely disdain for surveys but your participation would be immensely helpful in making the study a success. A link to the survey is included below. An explanation of my project is included with the survey.

Link to the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=kLMxj8dkk_2bls7yCBmNV7bg_3d_3d

Thanks and best regards, Mike Lyons lyonspen | (talk) 21:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Djibouti Eritrean Conflict undid...
You undid my revision without comment I was wondering if you could discuss your concerns. Otherwise I will reverse it... say 3 days? Merhawie (talk) 01:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Although I disagree I have made an addition to the page that adds valuable context, and if I may say, some balance to the background section. Don't worry, I've also added a number of sources too! Merhawie (talk) 15:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Earthquakes Project Newsletter
The WikiProject Earthquakes newsletter for September 2009 has been released. Be sure to check on our status.  ceran  thor 11:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Pozdravi
Nismo se dugo culi, imao sam neke obaveze, nisam bio nesto posebno na Vikipediji. Ali dobro da sam navracao u zadnjih par dana. Treba mi tvoja pomoc. Vec treci put zaredom u zadnje tri godine su nominovali List of insurgent fatality reports za brisanje, prosla dva puta smo uspeli da ga spasimo, ali ovaj put je neizvesno. Za sada je 9 njih za brisanje dok je 6 protiv, ja licno nisam glasao jer ne smem da se ekspoziram vise da me ne bi onaj ludak ponovo ganjao da me blokira. Dobro bi dosla tvoja pomoc da se ukljucis u debatu. Ako ga obrisu napravice presedan da mozda obrisu one spiske clanova snaga bezbednosti Avganistana i Iraka koji su poginuli ili spisak poginulih u Somaliji koji si ti napravio. Debata je ovde http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_insurgent_fatality_reports_in_Iraq Veliki pozdrav! 89.216.236.56 (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Massacres
Other templates don't have, only the Template:Campaignbox Sri Lankan Civil War has links to the massacres and mass graves. I think those should be removed, they're irrelevant. 98.119.158.59 (talk) 00:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Yemeni rebel groups
Hey Feargod, I've noticed you've done editing on the Sa'dah insurgency and I was wondering if you could clear this up: Do you know if Shabab al-Muomineen and the Huthis are essentially synonymous? If so I'd suggest a merge. Joshdboz (talk) 13:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. Merge it, please. --<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 13:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Iraq war
Potrebna mi pomoc na diskusionoj strani sa nekim tvrdoglavkom koji hoce u infobox-u da razdvoji Siitske od Sunijskih gerilaca. Dok se mozda slazem s njim da je to bio trostrani rat gde su Siitski gerilci se borili i protiv Sunija i Amerikanaca i Suniji protiv Siita i Sunija, na njegov nacin kako on to uradi broj poginulih civila se sada nalazi u koloni koja je za Mahdi Armiju pa izgleda kao da je milion Siitskih gerilaca poginulo, takodje broj poginulih gerilaca koji je stavljen u box-u je i za Sunije i Siite, a on ih je sad razdvojio pa broj stoji samo za Sunije, a nije samo za Sunije. Plus on jos mene optuzuje da su mi nekonstruktivni editi. Stvarno mi treba pomoc sa ovim tvrdoglavkom. Poz!89.216.239.108 (talk) 19:56, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * jesam. Nego, sto se uzrujavas ja sam odavno odustao od takvih stvari covjece. Ovdje je teska anarhija hehe. Ja editiram nesto samo ako mislim da ce MENI jednom to mozda zatrebati..--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 20:07, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * ej, ja sam morao da otvorim stranicu o napadu u Iranu. Ili, gle na sta lici 25 October 2009 Baghdad bombings... mislim da je tako jer svi vise na fejsu!!--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 20:13, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * U principu mi ne bi smetalo. Ali prosto ne volim kad me neko optuzi za vandalizam a to nisam uradio. Ja sad ga konstantno pitam sta sam to nekonstruktivno uradio i on nece da mi odgovori. Sad je trazio da me blokira administrator, misli ako me blokira da je zavrsio sa problemom. Reci mi sad, kako bih trebao da reagujem, prosto me iznervirao covek.89.216.239.108 (talk) 20:15, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * pusti to i gotovo. linija manjeg otpora nema druge za vrijeme anarhije. nisam te pitao nikad studiras li sta--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 20:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * E izvini, bio sam izasao da uzmem da jedem, zavrsio sam sa faksom sad u julu, diplomirao sam, isao asm na Braca Karic ekonomski univerzitet, zavrsio sam menadzment u bankarstvu. Treba sad da krenem na master sledeceg meseca. Studiras li ti nesto?89.216.239.108 (talk) 21:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * istoriju, 3. godina--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 23:22, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hehe, blago tebi, ja sam hteo istoriju, ali morao sam da mislim kako cu da nadjem posao posle faksa, pa sam zato izabrao ekonomiju, a mene bas istorija interesuje. Zato ti zavidim.89.216.239.108 (talk) 03:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * uvijek mozes da se time bavis. Uzmes si jedno polje, citas, citas i mozda nesto i napises ;)--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 10:46, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Marko Polo
I've used the cite web template to cite the reference you provided. Can you confirm that the language is Serbo-Croat. If it is not, would you please correct it. Mjroots (talk) 13:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Dagestan 1999.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dagestan 1999.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Where is the list of unreliable news agencies please?
I'd love to throw out everything by Faux News say... Hcobb (talk) 21:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You may be right on Fox, but it was proven that PRESS TV is an Iranian propaganda tool.--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 09:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * By whom? Where's the cite?  Hcobb (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Take your time please and read the article PRESS TV. I did the same before making my initial statement. There are a plenty of sources--<font color="#003399">TheFE  ARgod  (Ч) 13:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hajduk Jugend
Hello! Have you got this file in .svg or bigger? Greets!--0vertake (talk) 11:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No.--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 11:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * U pm, znao si dekleriati Hajduk Jugend kao svoje? Ha? Kakvo je to ponasanje?--0vertake (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * that image is my photo and photoshop edit taken from the original t-shirt picture. Anyway, mind your language, please.--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 21:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:58, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello TheFEARgod! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Rodoljub Vulović -
 * 2) Emzar Kvitsiani -

overlinking
I saw that dates and years were linked in South Yemen insurgency. Please note that this is no longer done. Tony  (talk)  06:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Infobox
To what changes in the infobox are you referring?Kermanshahi (talk) 12:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Well you see there are many insurgencies were different insurgent groups fight each other, infact it is more often the case that insurgents to fight amongs each other, than not. Yet they are always listed at one side and the government is listed at the other side, to list every insurgent group as a seperate combatant is just impossible in most cases. Furthermore there were rumours at the time of al-Shabaab and Hizbul Islam, this would have made the infobox more or less impossible. And than comes another complicating matter which is that in the central regeon (Beledweyn) and Mogadishu, the two are still allies while they are only at war in the Southern regeon + there are still negotiations between them to make an alliance again in which case we'd have to move them back anyway and than comes that it's not sure Hizbul Islam is going to last very long anymore either, there's a big chance al-Shabaab will finish them off in the next few months so to make matters simple I changed the campaignbox back. Kermanshahi (talk) 17:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Press TV
Their articles are somewhat biased but only very, very rarely do they actually report something that isn't true. I already think the Sa'dah war related articles have a lot of pro-Saudi/Yemeni regime biasm in them, if we now start excluding Shi'a sources due to allegations by hostile powers and only report from the Sunnis which are supposedly "reliable" (do you believe the Saudi regime tells the truth?) the articles will turn into wahabi propaganda, we don't want that to happen do we? Kermanshahi (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Pakistan attacks 2001-2009
Template:Campaignbox Pakistan attacks 2001-2009 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Sottolacqua (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Bombing articles
Look at the templates for the bombings in some countries such as Iraq and Pakistan. I see there are a lot of bombing incidents that didn't have high casualties, political impacts and less contents. We should delete those articles. I think we should only keep those incidents that had really high death tolls, government involvement and protest and deep influence on politics. Those incidents that don't have these requirements should be deleted. Qajar (talk) 09:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * what do you mean by "really high death tolls"?--<font color="#003399">TheFE ARgod  (Ч) 11:28, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe at least more than 50 or 100 death. Qajar (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Template:Pakistan terrorist attacks
I added a comment related to both Template:Pakistan terrorist attacks and the List of terrorist incidents in Pakistan since 2001 on the talk page for the list of incidents regarding casualty significance and organization. Please feel free to comment or provide any insight. Sottolacqua (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Not a great response
This is just a message to inform you that I've posted a note about your comment on Etiquette Alerts. Per the regular process, I am letting you know - I realise you want me to leave you alone and I will, but I needed to notify you of this. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 11:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of War on Terrorism casualties
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is War on Terrorism casualties. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/War on Terrorism casualties. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 22 February 2010 (UTC)