User talk:Deadlock

The Humungous Image Tagging Project
Hi. You've helped with the WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

cannon
is plural for cannon, too. :-) - Omegatron 18:31, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

Madejski Stadium
Do you have a source for the changed capacity? The details on the offical Reading FC web site still states 24,200. Regards, MartinRe 21:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The figure is given in a renewal letter sent to all season ticket holders. Hopefully that doesn't fall foul of the "no original research" rule. --Deadlock 21:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Alas, I believe it does, or more accurately, the verifibility policy. It's almost identical to the case outlined in WP:V, you have received the information from the primary source, so you become the secondary source. (you are reporting that the primary source said X). I'm sure you're a reliable person, but are you a reliable source as per WP:RS? :)
 * Best thing to do might be to give Reading a ring and ask them to update the offical figures on the web site, and that removes the problem completely. All the best, MartinRe 21:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Bother. I've known the figure was wrong for a long time; I think the original capacity was 24,200, but they've made at least five minor changes since then. I've emailed the webmaster, hopefully they'll update it. --Deadlock 21:52, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * ...and they have, to 24,225! I've had an email from the webmaster saying that he believes this to be the capacity. I've checked up in the 2006/2007 Supporter's Guide (glossy booklet issued by the club and covered with logos), which gives it as 24,054. So that's two official publications with different figures. I suspect the guide is the correct one, since it comes from the ticket office, but the website is more easily verifiable. What I'll do is update all the pages where the capacity is listed to the website figure, and stick a note on the talk page of Madejski Stadium. --Deadlock 21:24, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Way to heavy?
A car is like 2 tones, this is a space ship it should probably weigh more then 2 tons. If anything its under-weight ;-) Matthew  Fenton  ( contribs ) 17:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh. 2.95 MILLION tones, i thought it meant normal 2 tones, heh. Matthew  Fenton  ( contribs ) 15:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nick Langston
An editor has nominated Nick Langston, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD
Please see: Articles for deletion/Peace Cup Redddogg (talk) 16:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Mega Shark Versus Giant Octopus‎
Please see my comment at the Mega Shark Versus Giant Octopus talk page. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  23:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Toffee Crisp


The article Toffee Crisp has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced trivia; no independent notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf  (talk)  06:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)