User talk:DeadlyRampage26/02-24 - 07-24

G'day DeadlyRampage26, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email [mailto:help@wikimedia.org.au?subject=Help+me+please!&body=Please+tell+us+your+Wikipedia+username+and+the+article+you+are+trying+to+change+and+what+the+problem+is help@wikimedia.org.au].

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Where to ask a question, try the Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:


 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Article titles
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 02:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Legalising Cannabis Bill 2023 (Australia) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Legalising Cannabis Bill 2023 (Australia). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it has no text content outside the infobox. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks just fixed some stuff so should be good now DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 09:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, I'm J2m5. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Jenny Leong have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. J2m5 (talk) 11:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Monique Ryan. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Project 2025, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

User page advocacy
I think you should have a read of WP:SOAPBOX and remove advocating voting for a particular party from your user page. GraziePrego (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Done. My USER PAGE is now GraziePrego approved. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 21:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Miriam Beswick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miriam Beswick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miriam Beswick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. J2m5 (talk) 10:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

pendulum graphic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tasmanian_House_of_Assembly

The convention is to have the sitting government sitting to the right of the Speaker, so Liberal and Labor sitting positions should be swapped. After that the convention is to have crossbenchers sitting according to political alignment towards major parties. Greens should be firmly next to Labor given their media reports that they wanted to try forming government with them. Then I would go Independents given their strong environmental policy aligning with The Greens, and then the Lambies who are fairly centrist/pro Small Business which is more aligned with Liberals. So Swap Lambies and Independents position too, basically 49.185.171.129 (talk) 11:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * ahh yes I got confused I though government sat to the left, and it was created by a generator so i cant actually control the sides of which the crossbench are on. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Delegation from Tasmania to the Australian Parliament
Hello, DeadlyRampage26

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Klbrain, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Delegation from Tasmania to the Australian Parliament, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) Edit the page
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2024 Iranian strikes in Israel
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Iranian strikes in Israel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20DeadlyRampage26&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1219223001 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Iranian_strikes_in_Israel&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1219223001%7C2024%20Iranian%20strikes%20in%20Israel%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steph Hodgins-May, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Australian Defence Force Missile Procurement


The article Australian Defence Force Missile Procurement has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''I nominate this page for proposed deletion for the following reasons: everything covered within this article is suitably, and better reported on elsewhere. I don't believe this page provides anything of notability that is not already covered in each service's own page generally and the services list of equipment page more specifically (e.g. List of equipment of the Australian Army). This article is a just a rehashing of the Service, Equipment and specific item Pages, and provides no extra detail, sources or content notable in its own right.

Further this page is not specific enough, and does not meet notability reqs, (and admits in the first line that the "name" is unofficial, it is in fact a name created by the articles author, which probably breaches WP:OR) in fact the name does not refer to anything specific, or of suitable notability to warrant its own article, the "Australian Defence Force Missile Procurement" is not a program, or group of projects (like is stated in the intro paragraph) or a acquisition schemer etc. but is instead just a curated collection of systems that have been or will be acquired by the ADF and brief descriptions of them, just colloquially listed by the articles creator as "Australian Defence Force Missile Procurement". The relevant articles already exist and articles author should spend their time contributing to extant articles of actual notability, than on this page. Whilst sources exist for the individual things mentioned, their detailed coverage elsewhere and the lack of sources for "Australian Defence Force Missile Procurement" as a thing in of itself; is reason for this page to be deleted.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hello, DeadlyRampage26

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Australian Defence Force Missile Procurement, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. KarmaKangaroo (talk) 20:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your question on my talk page
Hello DeadlyRampage26, I have just replied to the message you left on my talk page regarding your edits to the Daniel Andrews and Lee Rhiannon articles but I neglected to ping you. So, just in case you miss my reply, I am alerting you to it on here. JennyOz (talk) 10:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm J2m5. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Lee Rhiannon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. J2m5 (talk) 11:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject and Suggestion for Creating Articles
Hi @DeadlyRampage26 just wanted to post something here to try to provide some good opportunities and constructive help for you for you.

I note that you are interested in some military articles, and If you aren't already I would suggest you join the WikiProject Military history as this may provide some opportunities for you, as well as articles that need creation. There are specific Task Forces within the project for Australian military as well.

Secondly I note there have been some issues with your article creation, and whilst you are able to submit articles with your edit count, I would however suggest to use the Article Creation wizard, and go through the process of drafting the page to a good level and then submitting it later. Usually the creation of an article to meet say a B-class article will take a considerable amount of time, and several tens of edits and re-edits (take a look at my AN/PEQ-15 article history before it was moved to the main namespace), this should be done to a draft article in the the Draft namespace, prior to submitting the article, or moving the article to the main namespace.

Here is a link to the Article Wizard, which has some good tips as well. You may also consider using your personal sandbox to create drafts as well.

Anyway I hope to see around the place. KarmaKangaroo (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks man. Sounds good DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Civility in article discussions
Hi DeadlyRampage26,

While I sympathize with your underlying concern - that the article Human shields in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict has WP:NPOV issues - it isn't helpful to make comments accusing editors of being Hamas supporters, nor is it helpful to say how biased is the author of this article.

In fact, we have policies on civility, include forbidding personal attacks and required the assumption of good faith, that such comments would violate, even when not directed at a specific editor. I would encourage you to focus solely on the content and the issues with it; raising issues with the editors will often hinder efforts to improve the content, and can result in sanctions including being banned from the topic area.

In line with this, I would encourage you to modify your recent talk page comment to focus solely on the content.

BilledMammal (talk) 06:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, ive edited some of my concern to remove a personal attack on the author, however i will not remove the fact i think the author and page is biased, because it is. It is our responsibility as editors of a free wikipedia to bring unjust actions into the light and strive for a truly unbiased encyclopaedia. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 09:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 15:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

ACT electorates
Hi DeadlyRampage26. You recently moved the article names of the ACT electorates to "Division of..." with the comment "Move to more informative name, and its also standard among other states and territories". I don't think this move should have been made and the reason does not seem accurate, as "Division" is not standard among other states and territories (other than federally). What electorates/districts/divisions are called in each jurisdiction is enshrined in law in the jurisdiction's electoral act. Federal electorates are indeed called "Division of [electorate]" (Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918), but in most states they are called electoral districts (NSW, VIC, QLD, SA, WA), although Tasmania and the Northern Territory do call them Divisions (NT Electoral Act 2004). The ACT does call them "electorates" (not divisions or districts), see https://www.elections.act.gov.au/electoral_boundaries/electorates, and this is the terminology defined by the ACT legislation Electoral Act 1992. Can I ask that you revert these page moves, or if you wish to discuss or gain consensus for the change, post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics? Thanks, --Canley (talk) 00:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Ok yep i will revert them soon. I was under the impression that most states/ territories called them divisions DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 02:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Hello  and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
 * If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Stephanie Cameron for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephanie Cameron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stephanie Cameron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Yep i was hoping to add some more info in a couple hours but i probably wont be able to so i wont contest the deletion DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 11:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Surface Fleet Review. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Note
Please note that there is no consensus at the moment to include Russia in the infobox for settlements captured since 2022. Mellk (talk) 13:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, is there a discussion surrounding that? I understand that it is internationally recognised as Ukrainian land but i think readers should be able to see somewhere at a glance that it is controlled by russia. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 07:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * There was a discussion on Teahouse. I do not have the link now but I can find this discussion if you wish. Mellk (talk) 17:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * All good, no need to find it. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 01:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Name of Fatima Payman in Perso-Arabic script
Hi there. I noticed that you removed my addition of "Fatima Payman" to the infobox written in the Perso-Arabic script. It is not a translation from the English: Her English name is a translation from the Persian.

For example, you can find many inclusions of a person's name in their native language among pages in Category:Australian politicians of Asian descent.

Such things are never too much detail for certain people. For instance, I know the Arabic script and it's useful information. You can gloss over if you don't know the script, but it's in my opinion absolutely not "unnecessary" that it warrants removal from the infobox.

What do you think? Y. Dongchen (talk) 09:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Ok. I sort of understand what your getting at. It is fine to be left there for now but I think eventually a discussion should be held either at WP:AUP for a Australian politics-wide understanding on the addition, or alternatively it could be held on the article's respective talk page, thanks!

edit: I have just checked your category suggestion and upon reading, practically none of the respective articles have the asian translation in the infobox, with it being common to have it in the lead paragraph. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 11:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for checking.
 * Again, it is not a translation (if you mean her last name is originally from the English language). That is her original name and the Latin version is rather the translation.
 * One such in the aforementioned category is Helen Sham-Ho.
 * If you want more examples beyond the politicians in that category, such include:
 * the former president of Afghanistan (Ashraf Ghani)
 * Reza Pahlavi (last Crown Prince of Iran)
 * Another random example would be the infobox of Russian model Kristina Pimenova, who moved to the US at the age of 10. The infobox has the parameter for native names for that very purpose of signifying cultural heritage.
 * Fatima Payman has an Afghan cultural heritage. The name "Payman" is of Classical Persian origin.
 * But I can discuss further on the article talkpage. I see that you started a topic. Y. Dongchen (talk) 11:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your swift response. I understand your point, especially that the name in it of itself is a translation from Persian or Arabic, however, my problem is that there is not a generalised consensus yet that it should be there. I appreciate your interest and your discussion. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 11:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Victorian Socialists, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Socialist Alternative and Socialist Alliance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hi DeadlyRampage26! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Josh Burns (politician) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. – notwally (talk) 00:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)


 * oh ok, sorry, it's sort of a force of habit. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 03:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)