User talk:DeadlyWraith

March 2007
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added obviously incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in our encyclopedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Natalie 05:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Nicholas Ottaviani, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ronbo76 05:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Natalie 12:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

P51 and Battle of the Bulge
I just wanted to let you know I reverted your edits in both articles. I assume you acted in good faith. Your addition to P51 was only partly correct and in any case already covered in the article. Your addition to Battle of the Bulge seemed unclear and if rewritten might require a published source as documentation. Don't let these reversions stop you in participating on Wikipedia, but be more careful, read through the entire articles you intend to edit and add only documentable information. Thanks, --Caranorn 13:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC)