User talk:DeadmanUndertaker/Archives/2008/June

Article has no quality, or importance.
Is there a reason why you're adding "Delete Article has no quality, or importance." to every single Articles for Deletion for today? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It can be considered disrupting Wikipedia to make a point if you use the same reasoning on 40 different AfDs. I don't think you have an axe to grind, but someone might think you do if you use the same reasoning over and over again. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No, don't stop participating. Just try to put a little more thought into your AfD discussions; "No quality or importance" doesn't really make sense in this one, for instance. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, here. ff m  00:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Victory Road (2008)

 * Yeah you better keep a close eye on Victory Road because I looked at the spoilers and there is going to be a Full Metal Mayhem match and also Kong lost the title. So people are going to be trying to add the Full Metal Mayhem and probably a rematch between Taylor and Kong. Also Sting said he'll be sitting at ringside during Joe's and Booker's match. So there are going to be alot of people trying to place this stuff in there before it is announced. Also a match between Joe and Sting will be added to Hard Justice (2008), so keep a close eye on that too.-- Will C  21:22, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Night of Champions (2008)
I understand where you're coming from. You want the article to look good. The problem is that right now it doesn't matter much. Because after NOC everyone will be working on it to get it finished and pretty. Probably even get it to GA status. So most of it that is bad looking will be fixed or deleted. Right now it all looks okay. But do as you wish just don't remove the IC title match because it hasn't fully been anounced but there is a reason that it is in the article.-- Will C  05:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure if no one cares anymore. I'm not even sure what is a good article. I suck at reports, so I can't really be the judge of what is good and what is bad. I've tried to get some things to be good articles, like Lockdown (2008). Which I've been working on in my sandbox for about a month.-- Will C  05:55, 28 June 2008 (UTC)