User talk:Dean&johnny

March 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Matthew Good. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Message text. Dean&#38;johnny (talk) 10:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

I understand what you are saying and want you to know that I wouldn't want to disrupt anything. The problem is I'm trying to publish factual and verified information that paints the person that the article is about in a bad light. But this other user is trying to defend that person by erasing everything. After your intervention, I tried adding a part which they used as a reason for deleting the content (they could have also done that instead) hoping they will drop it. But there is no way I will let this user obfuscate the facts just because they don't like them.

Thank you