User talk:Dean2812

Welcome!
Hello, Dean2812, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Dean2812, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dean2812


A tag has been placed on User:Dean2812 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

User page
Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself and your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not: The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
 * a workspace for a draft article
 * a personal website, blog, or social media site
 * a space for self-promotion or other advertising
 * a CV/resumé
 * a lengthy autobiography


 * Than you. I wanted to list my former company page. Consumers still ask what happed to the brand and I was trying to list some information on it’s activities and historic information. Should I list the company in a different way? Dean2812 (talk) 12:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia includes only topics that are notable, so you must provide evidence that this company met Wikipedia's definition of a notable company. This means that it must have received significant coverage from multiple reliable and independent sources. Lacking this coverage means that it is unfortunately not worthy of inclusion; mere existence does not equal notability. In addition, since you were involved with this company, writing about it would be an inherent conflict of interest.


 * The Articles for Creation process would be the recommended avenue here. You would create a draft article that could then be evaluated by involved editors. A successful review would mean your article is published, and an unsuccessful review would mean it is sent back to you with recommendations for improvement. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)