User talk:Dean3000

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, your recent edits to the Hot Shots! Part Deux plot summary added a significant amount of unneeded detail and have been reverted. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You are welcome to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 07:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

June 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Britain First. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.--Salix alba (talk): 12:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Britain First has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Britain First was changed by Dean3000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865506 on 2015-03-15T05:43:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Wiae. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Megan McKenna seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wiae  /tlk  00:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Film plots
Thank you for taking the time to work on film plots, but please see WP:FILMPLOT for guidelines on how they should be written. Specifically, they should generally be between 400 and 700 words. Very long plots make it extremely difficult to read the article. Wikipedia's plot summaries are meant to be a brief summary, not a comprehensive scene-by-scene analysis of everything that happens in the film. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2015
Wikipedia rules states that plots should be around 400 to 700 words. You're edit to World in Conflict goes to 2,000 which is why it was reverted. Thanks. Supergodzilla2090 (talk) 01:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. regarding this edit. Ground Zero &#124; t 11:32, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to History of Japan— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 02:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Plot summaries
Good work. But remember, plot summaries needn't be so detailed. A brief outline of key points is more than enough. Cheers. —  Film Fan  01:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legally Blonde, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chihuahua and Dyke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Training Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seven Pounds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blind ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Seven_Pounds check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Seven_Pounds?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CHiPs (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/CHiPs_%28film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/CHiPs_%28film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wild Bill (2011 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlotte Spencer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Special Bulletin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Office (British TV series) episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firewall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Picard's Facepalm. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Hunt for Red October (film) and The Sum of All Fears (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions you can leave me a message on my talk page, or most preferably on the talk pages of the affected articles. Thanks. Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 03:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 19:12, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Disambiguation link notification for March 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Campaign (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Participants in Lads' Army
I see that you have again deleted the list of participants in Lads' Ary. I disagree with this but as I don't want to engage in an edit war with you. I have instead asked for other opinions on the article's talkpage and I would be grateful if you would say there why you have deleted the participants list. Many thanks. Rillington (talk) 05:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your post on the talkpage and for explaining your reason for deletion. On the assumption that nobody else replies, would you be happy for this to be resolved by obtaining a Third opinion? Rillington (talk) 13:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure, why not. Dean3000 (talk) 09:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I've just asked for the third opinion. Rillington (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)