User talk:Deana175

Regarding edits to English Standard Version
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
 * Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
 * The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'geocities\.com' (link(s): http://www.geocities.com/bible_translation/list/files/gender-inclusive-esv.doc http://www.geocities.com/bible_translation/list/files/gender-inclusive-esv.doc http://www.geocities.com/bible_translation/esvcomments.doc http://www.geocities.com/bible_translation/esvcomments.doc) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly.	Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source.	Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
 * Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites.	 For more information about me, see my FAQ page.	 Thanks! SquelchBot (talk) 15:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Since yours was a good-faith revert, I think Squelchbot has overreacted here. I'll leave a note at his/her/its Talk page. Peter Ballard (talk) 23:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
While edits are appreciated, you probably didn't make the best start in with the English Standard Version. Peter put in his usual POV but what your doing will just lead to an edit war that will ruin the article, which isn't half bad at the moment. Hope you understand. Knight1000 (talk) 15:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Perhaps by calling Strauss' document "pretty poor" I was being prevocative, but I think all my edits were constructive. I'll write a little bit more at Talk:English Standard Version where you can discuss if you want. Peter Ballard (talk) 23:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)