User talk:Dearkuyabimbo

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating San Jose, Navotas, Dearkuyabimbo!

Wikipedia editor Mediran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Just add sources if you have, better if reliable. I moved the page due to it fails the proper naming convention. Thank you and have a nice day!"

To reply, leave a comment on Mediran's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Amos Rey C. Hechanova
Hello, Dearkuyabimbo. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Amos Rey C. Hechanova, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Amos Rey C. Hechanova to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Mason Doering (talk) 01:15, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Why are you so willing to allow your Hechanova page to be deleted?
 * It really only needs a reference from a newspaper giving the results of the election.
 * That should not be complicated. Varlaam (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it may need more than that, as Punong Barangay seems to be a rather minor political position, so the article does not show notability, see WP:BIO. – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I've spent a while looking for some Internet sources, which I couldn't find. Have you got anything that could be used as a reference to save this article? Mason Doering (talk) 23:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I was frankly surprised that you hadn't written the article first in Tagalog/Ilokano/Cebuano where you would have been able to work through some of these matters.
 * English Wikipedia is a tough town to debut a new work.
 * Varlaam (talk) 02:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Act No. 243
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Act No. 243, may have something copied from http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php?title=Act_No._243. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 08:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Act No. 243


A tag has been placed on Act No. 243 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dengero (talk) 09:02, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Act. No. 137
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Act. No. 137, may be copied from http://philippinelaw.info/statutes/act137.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 09:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Act. No. 137


A tag has been placed on Act. No. 137 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dengero (talk) 09:12, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Act 1696
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Act 1696, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://philippinelaw.info/statutes/act1696-flag-law.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 00:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Act 1696


A tag has been placed on Act 1696 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —teb728 t c 00:23, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Act 1696 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Act 1696 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Act 1696 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —teb728 t c 08:48, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/San Jose, Navotas City concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/San Jose, Navotas City, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/San Jose, Navotas City


Hello Dearkuyabimbo. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "San Jose, Navotas City".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)