User talk:DeathMaster2001

Copyright violation
Hi DeathMaster2001. I have removed the plot section you added to Reef Blower, as it appears to have been copied from http://belfid.blogspot.ca/2011/03/spongebob-squarepants.html, which pre-dates its first appearance on this wiki. You are welcome to write a plot description using your own words. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bubblestand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Standalone notability
Hi there, though you mean well with your recent edits fleshing out articles Reef Blower and Bubblestand, we don't typically create articles on individual television episodes unless those television episodes have achieved standalone notability. Some examples of what might make an individual episode notable, might be if it was about a controversial subject that subsequently drew a great deal of critical discussion, or if the episode was well established as having inspired certain notable people or works, and so on. Simply existing isn't a sufficient reason for an episode article to exist. Additionally, the WikiProject Television community doesn't find IMDb user ratings to be worth inclusion in any article. We are only interested in what critics from reliable sources have to say about any given work. I have converted these articles back to redirects. Thanks and it's nothing personal. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

One Coarse Meal is Not Noticeable Enough to Warrant an Article
I understand that you think that One Coarse Meal warrants an wikipedia article due to the criticism by critics on Youtube. However, outside of these reviewers, this episode is not extremely noticeable. Therefore, the article that you have created violated the notability rule of wikipedia: that an episode must have standalone notability in order to have a wikipedia article. Take a look at some of the other standalone episode articles such as Help Wanted, Band Geeks, and Atlantis SquarePantis. Help Wanted is noticeable because it was the debut episode of Spongebob Squarepants, Band Geeks is noticeable because many fans and critics hailed it to be one of the best episodes of all time. Atlantis SquarePantis is noticable because it is a TV Special that contained both critical insight of the episode by critics and outside marketing. I know you like Mr. Enter's reviews since he reviewed this very episode on Animated Atrocities #13, but Mr. Enter is an amateur critic on Youtube and not a professional critic. In other words, Mr. Enter is not a reliable source yet. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Re: Caidin Johnson
Hi Andrew, thanks, I've blocked that account, but next time it'd be better to note it at Administrator intervention against vandalism, perhaps with a link to the long-term abuse page. Graham 87 05:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, have you heard of Wikipedia's original Andrew Norman? :-) I don't actually know him; I just know his username because I update the former admins pages on here and he was desysopped due to inactivity. His last edit was before your first one with this account. Graham 87 16:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for letting me know. By the way, this is my first time reporting a sock-puppet account, so I didn't really know about the "administrator intervention against vandalism" page up until this point. But anyways, thank you!
 * P.S. I don't know about this other Andrew Norman. It is pretty interesting that we both have the same name :) DeathMaster2001 (talk) 21:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries. Just to clarify though: the administrator intervention against vandalism page is only for extremely obvious vandalism, like the Caidin Johnson case. Pages like the admins' incident noticeboard and sockpuppet investigations are useful for less obvious cases. The tool Twinkle can be helpful for these sorts of reports. I thought you'd like the Andrew Norman coincidence. Graham 87 12:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I've been doing a lot of research about Caidin and what he's been doing over these past few years. I'm pretty sure you already know that he also vandalizes FANDOM (or Wikia) and he creates sock-puppets over there too. I even created a list of the sock-puppets I managed to find that have been blocked globally by FANDOM's admins (I found about 82 accounts). I also found out that he has multiple sock-puppet YouTube accounts. I found out that he had made 40 alternate YouTube accounts (21 of them are all called "Paramount Logos (number) - (insert topic here)". DeathMaster2001 (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)