User talk:Deb/Archive 18

Page Deletion
Hi Deb, I'm extremely new to wikipedia and I'm not even sure if I'm contacting you correctly so I beg for your patients. I created a wiki page for a client of mine: Kenneth Wiess. He's a rising musician from our town Lake Geneva Wisconsin and we'd like to create a page to recognize him and have it tied to the towns notable piece. Here is link to his facebook/proof of existence. https://www.facebook.com/wiess.k. With a following like that and plenty of references (provided) we're confused why it was deleted. So if you can inform us of what we're missing it would be appreciated! Thanks. Wiess002 (talk)

Project talk page
Hi, Deb. On some of the day-of-year pages I've noticed that you've removed some items with the note "improve distribution. See Project Talk page." Could you please tell me how to get to this page? I just want to see a guideline on what should and shouldn't be included.Bjones (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you. These pages certainly do run long, so I can see why some control on entries might be desirable. Not sure what that would entail, but I'll follow the discussion with interest.Bjones (talk) 03:26, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of the Eduardo Kohn article
Hi Deb, you just deleted the article I created on increasingly prominent anthropologist Eduardo Kohn on the basis that there is 'No indication of importance'. Eduardo Kohn is making very important contributions to anthropology and other disciplines at the moment as evidenced by his recent work 'How Forests Think' and so is entierly worthy of an entry on Wikipedia. As someone who is very involved with the anthropological world I am well placed to comment on his work and I was hoping that creating the article would provide an opportunity for others to do so. I can also provide a significant series of other references, beyond those to his 2013 book, which show the wide dissemination of his work and his growing importance in the anthropological community. To be honest, I do not understand why you deleted this page at all? If you could shed some light on this it would be great as Eduardo Kohn is certainly a highly important figure in anthropology, and beyond, at the moment.

Maybe I just need to recreate it with more information, more references and a greater indication as to the importance of his work?

Pt80088 (talk) 17:58, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of the L'Eree Bay Hotel article
Fine, it looks like you're going to be stubborn. Could you please give me or point me to a copy of the old article before it was deleted so I can at least keep the work I did on it and edit it to remove what might look like advertising? Thanks.

-thekaphox

Deletion of the L'Eree Bay Hotel article
Hi Deb, I've wanted to get started on Wikipedia for quite a while, and thought it would be apt to start by documenting a hotel that is on my island, so I started with the one that first came to my head. I'm absolutely unsure as to how it sounded anything like advertising, as it spoke very matter-of-factly and I used no superlatives in inappropriate adjectives. Wikipedia relies on its users, and if the very first article they decide to create and spend time on is removed, then it's hardly very welcoming.

Thanks,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKaphox (talk • contribs) 19:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Jean Yip Group page
Hi Deb,

Thanks for your note, and your flag on the article Pet Lover’s Centre. I’ll get on improving it when I can. I also created a new page on the Jean Yip Group, a prominent styling and beauty company in Southeast and East Asia, but it was deleted soon after its creation. I also can’t find the deleted text in my log, or indeed, any of my edits. Could I get the text back for further editing, and also some feedback on why it was flagged as G11? I noted that on your talkpage that articles with 10 references or less were okay-ed (I had 16), and if it’s a matter of “promotional language”, I’d be happy to fix that to your specifications. Thanks!

Heynubcake (talk) 06:48, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Greenhill & Co. page
Hello Deb! Pages of basically all direct competitors of the same size do exist (see Moelis & Co., Evercore Partners, Centerview Partners, and many more). Greenhill & Co. is a NYSE listed company with revenues similar to the above mentioned. I therefore do not understand why this page should be treated any differently.

Many thanks for your help!

Calamarifritti (talk) 16:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Niklas

Nobles law firm page
Hello Deb!

If you will look at page accurately you will see no difference from other law firm pages. The main goal was to inform (and there was reliable sources like The Lawyer and Global Legal Post did you see it?)! in 2013 there was a spin off of Noerr Kyiv office, the main message is - re-branding. Check by yourself Noerr or other pages. Could you tell me which part you consider as advertising/promotion before just deleting it. By deleting unreasonably article of Wikipedia first-timer you do not do a good job. I would appreciate if you show me evidence or restore my article! There are dozens of similar pages and i use links to Noerr page and to The Lawyer publication about re-branding. Plus where i can find original article?

Oasis Beverages Page
Hi Deb! @deb

I am not sure why this page was deleted. The contents were meant to informative about an unknown company which has grown since 2008 and now is quite large. We want people who know who we are as there is quite alot of news about us. have a look for yourself, search google for oasis beverages pabst

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamIversen (talk • contribs) 14:28, 30 September 2014 (UTC)  AdamIversen

TimeCamp Page
Hi, Deb!

I've made some changes according to Wikipedia guidelines. Could you have a look and tell me if it's okay? Draft of TimeCamp article is on my user's site. I would be very grateful if you helped me with this. Thank you! Jan Goldewski (talk) 12:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Deb!

Could you tell me which parts of my TimeCamp article was against G.11 ( Unambiguous advertising or promotion )? I saw couple of articles that was completely similar, but they are not deleted. Your opinion will be very helpful for me to write this article again, but this time correctly. Thank you very much! Best regards. Jan Goldewski (talk) 19:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi ! Long time no chat! This user has come to me requesting adoption with regards to this page. Would it be a time sink or do you think there's actually something here that could be worthwhile?  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 12:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

THANKS!
thank you for the advice :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newsha7 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Deb,

I hope my page is ok now. It's my first on Wiki in English. I have a job from my university to update and create pages for teachers and artists in all languages. In Romanian Wiki it wasn's difficult. Thank you for help

RalucaUNARTE (talk) 08:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Con Moriarty
Why did you delete the article I was constructing for my father Con Moriarty, who was a well-known rugby player and local politician? I really cannot see any reason why my entry should have been deleted in such a rude way, and frankly find it very offensive that you did so. Please re-instate it.

Southampton University Pre-Sessional Course
It's back. Up to you if you want to delete it again. I proposed it for deletion. I believe this might be related to Caroline Jane Williams and the associated AfD. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Alison Booth - Belmond La Samanna
I've read through the guidelines again and see why you removed the Belmond La Samanna page. Could I have another go at it please? If so, perhaps you could let me know what the best procedure would be. Many thanks, Alison — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alison.booth (talk • contribs) 14:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

==Thank you - do I just upload another new Belmond La Samanna page, or do I put the new content on the page where it says the page has been deleted? I see you have also tagged another page for deletion - could I have another go at it now, before you take it down pse? I am going through other articles right now that you have commented on, and addressing the comments in turn.

Sahana Software Foundation
Hi Deb - I noticed yesterday that you corrected the speedy deletion action on the basis of being overly promotional for the Sahana Software Foundation article, since it wasn't promotional. You instead added the notability and needs sources templates. I just added additional sources, and also added awards and recognition to demonstrate sufficient notability. If you are not watching the page, please review when you get a chance, and if the article now meets your threshold, please remove the tags. Otherwise advise and I'll add even more sources, including references to the company's participation in Google Camp, its role with the City of Los Angeles earthquake preparedness efforts, and the fact that the Foundation was the genesis for the Free and Open Source Software - Humanitarian (FOSS) group.Timtempleton (talk) 02:40, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Redirect?
Why did you redirect Cut (EP) to Aaron Yan's page? SmileBlueJay97 talk 16:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Reply
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Mark Miller (talk) 04:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC) ...and another one at AN/I.--Mark Miller (talk) 04:20, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

I don't think anyone has alerted you to this yet
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:20, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

You need to stop vandalizing and deleting people's articles. Someone stop this person! She should be banned from wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.1.48 (talk) 05:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Someone please stop this person from vandalizing other people's webpages! How do you report her to wikipedia? She is deleting so much LEGITIMATE content on other people's web pages. I read the link she posted and none of what she deleted fit the criteria for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.1.48 (talk) 05:41, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I had a quick look, and it appears that Deb reverted a pending change that might not have been the best option, which was subsequently re-reverted. It's probably a simple mistake. It happens, we're human. Now, IP, please could you learn how to sign your posts and then drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass because frankly it looks like you are harassing Deb for a pound of flesh, and that's never a good idea. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Per Ritchie333 and the ANI thread, it's best to not revert a pending change just because of a missing edit summary. It's better to accept the edit and leave the person a talk message asking them to use edit summaries in the future.  71.202.1.48 is of course being unnecessarily rude, but that's being discussed separately at ANI.  50.0.205.237 (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello, I do not believe I am being unnecessarily rude or harassing for a "pound of flesh" or stalking her. If you take a look at the history for the page in question, and if you actually look at the posted diffs on the ANI forum, you will see that she has made several deletions, not just once, but THREE TIMES. Frankly, it seems to me that Ritchie333 is being rude to me by implying a pejorative stereotype against me.71.202.1.48 (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, Mr. or Ms. unregistered editor, whether you are being rude in the usual sense, you are being stubborn and arrogant in refusing to listen to the advice of multiple other editors, who have told you to use edit summaries, sign your posts, stop the personal attacks, and stop being so confrontational. Regardless of the extent of errors by Deb, you are disrupting the encyclopedia, and I request that an uninvolved administrator give you a one-week block.    Robert McClenon (talk) 21:05, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Deb: Please consider whether, in spite of being wrong about his or her whole approach to Wikipedia, the unregistered editor may have made valid edits to May 22 that should be accepted.  A stopped clock is right twice a day.  The unregistered editor is wrong about everything else, but may be right about the edits.  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:05, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think I'm being stubborn and arrogant or unnecessarily confrontational at all! I am just trying to prevent her from disruptive editing. And please tell me, how am I making any personal attacks? And I am signing my comments. I do not feel a block would solve anything. 71.202.1.48 (talk) 22:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Getting back on a clean page
Hi I got my page deleted because of a too promotional content. - Fair enough, I tried to recreate it (with a new content) but I still have the spam tag. How can I make it clean with the dsame page name? Jayham1971 (talk) 10:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Sumant Sinha
Hi! I see that you've twice speedy-deleted Sumant sinha as G11 (and that deleted it as G12). It's back among us, as Sumant Sinha this time, complete with promotional tone and copyvios from http://renewpower.in/about-renew/board-of-directors and http://www.sumantsinha.com/biography.html. Can you do the honours again, or should I list it at WP:CP? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Franz Sparry
Hello, Deb, I was wondering if you still think this person is notable, and if you can help verify it? It's been tagged for notability since May 2008 (apologies if I've contacted you about this one before). There's currently a big drive to try to get the backlog at CAT:NN to less than six years (it's a six and a half year backlog at the moment). Thanks in advance for any help you can offer, Boleyn (talk) 19:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

VinnieA81
Hello Deb, You had no business whatsoever deleting the page I created for the Greater Hartford Church of Christ. I posted the history as it was written by an elder of the church, Jim Fuda. I will be remaking it with the SAME EXACT content and would appreciate you people leaving it alone. If there is an "advertisements" in the page it is simply trying to bring more souls to Christ. The history is a straight forward history of the church and is in no way. shape, or form, an advertisement. Furthermore, any business or company that creates a page on here is advertising their business. Again, I would appreciate you people leaving my page alone.

Thanks --VinnieA81 (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Mike Settle song
Hi, thanks for volunteering to fill in the references for Sing Hallelujah (Mike Settle song). I was going to do it myself but you beat me to it. Good luck. I'll go to the gym for an hour and pick up when I get back. Thanks again. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Frightfully amusing (not). Deb (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You can communicate then. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * What's the issue exactly? You created an article without references - you know as well as I do that's not how it works.  I can't be here 24 hours a day to answer your comments.  I am not sure what I've done to give offence. Deb (talk) 17:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Might as well keep talk in one place. I think the issue is the 7 minute jump in, lack of courtesy and communication and the rather unhelpful edit summary. You're presumably able to distinguish a stub likely to pass WP:GNG, and there's no burning urgency to work under the 10 minute line is there, so why do it? In ictu oculi (talk) 17:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You know better than to try to start an argument like this. There is no reason to create a stub without references.  That's what your sandbox is for.Deb (talk) 17:48, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Instead of telling editors what they know and what they know better, let's look at what you can do for editors. For example you could link to guidelines. So for example your next comment here could be a helpful link to a guideline which clearly says that a stub being created should be blanked/redirected if there is not yet a footnote. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * There could - if I didn't know that you are not a newbie and you already know that. Deb (talk) 17:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you realize that you just did exactly the same thing again, you told an editor what they know. Well here's the thing, where then is the guideline that says that? Where also is the guideline that says a separate sentence is needed for stating a place of birth? In ictu oculi (talk) 18:04, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The Manual of Style for Biographies says that the place of birth should not go between the brackets. There is no guideline that says what an administrator should do when an article is created without the requisite references; there is one that says "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution."  You chose not to do this.  I took an appropriate course of action which caused both of us minimal inconvenience. Deb (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * No, sorry, but MOS:BIO doesn't say that. Yes someone tried to add it, but there was lengthy discussion about the merits of such a rule and the sentence was reverted. If someone is an admin and intends to defend edits by saying "an administrator" I believe they should declare this on User page. And yes you did cause me inconvenience, due to your 7 minute blank I lost the sources as I was adding them the first time. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:04, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, not sorry, MOS:BIO does say exactly that. There was debate about whether it should be removed, but no consensus that it should be. Nor is it possible that you lost the sources as a result of the redirect. Deb (talk) 17:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Deb. Sorry I left you in the lurch with those @#!*!$%... Hope you're well. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  14:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

SLK Global
Hi, thanks for deleting the above page. I guess the user is here specifically for that purpose. I will leave a helpful note on his talk page.Wikicology (talk) 11:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Fundacja Niczyje
Hi, I appreciate that you do important work deleting junk, but with this page I think you bit a newbie and could have been more constructive by tagging the page rather than deleting. Just a thought! Malick78 (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * yes he deleted it twice see-- it here . But I think  is right for its deletion. Deb action did not  appeared to me as  bitting newbies. There is enough room and lots for newbies to learn before article creation. However, the deletion must be speedy because the article met the criteria for speedy deletion. Meanwhile I don't want to believe that you never read the FAQ at the top of this talk page. If you haven't done so, kindly go back to read it. Thereafter you may leave an helpful note on his talk page advising him not to recreate the article so as not to keep wasting his precious time. Wikicology (talk) 16:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've told the girl (yes, a female not a male ;) ) who created the article to improve it, and I'll check the results in a minute. I also read the FAQ at the top, but I don't see why a notability tag couldn't help. The newbie who created the page didn't realise it had been deleted the second time and only understands because I have explained it to her. Malick78 (talk) 16:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, I did think about it. After the first deletion, I went to her page and asked her to read the guidelines (as you can see from her talk page). When she immediately recreated it without any improvements, I deleted it again.  I have just done so a third time.  I'm sorry that she doesn't understand the guidelines, but that's not my fault.  I am, however, wondering why she created it under that title instead of its correct title of Fundacja Dzieci Niczyje.  Any ideas? Deb (talk) 16:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Deb, you deleted it a third time despite my contesting it on the talk page. That's just rude and inconsiderate. You are not helping and should have answered on the talk page. I'm trying to teach the creator how to edit properly and you are being counterproductive. Malick78 (talk) 16:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * That's what the Sandbox is for.Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  16:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Malick, I did think about it, and if not for an edit conflict you would have read this a few minutes ago!
 * After the first deletion, I went to her page and asked her to read the guidelines (as you can see from her talk page). When she immediately recreated it without any improvements, I deleted it again. I have just done so a third time.  I'm sorry that she doesn't understand the guidelines, but that's not my fault.  I am, however, wondering why she created it under that title instead of its correct title of Fundacja Dzieci Niczyje.  Any ideas? Deb (talk) 16:59, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Because she is new. Really, many people don't understand our way of working and are intimidated by it. I suspect she'll not trying editing here for a year or two yet. She may not even understand you can leave messages for her (she's a student of mine but I haven't the time to check). Our ways have probably scared her off and Jimmy Wales is probably crying somewhere at this moment because we lost a female editor, since generally they hate this kind of confrontational approach (and she's editing in a foreign language to boot, which is even more intimidating). You could have acted gently, but you bit three times. That's a shame. Malick78 (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, you have a conflict of interest here. Why didn't she take any notice when you explained to her the reasons for the initial deletion of her article? Deb (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC
 * I knew that had a COI in connection with that editor. I thought you are very much aware of that. I think there is need to place Malick under constant surveilance. He may probably had some WP:MEAT if not WP:SOCK. Wikicology (talk) 18:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that is a bit of an exaggeration. Have you any evidence for that? Deb (talk) 21:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Evidence for what? Wikicology (talk) 21:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * For suggesting that there is sock puppetry involved. It's not an accusation to make lightly. Deb (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I beg your pardon! I had never accused him of sock puppetry. His claim above “ she's a student of mine but I haven't the time to check only suggest a MEAT (its the statement that suggest a MEAT and not Wikicology). I won't appreciate it, when you mis-quote my comment.Wikicology (talk) 21:36, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikicology, it sounded exactly as if you were suggesting that I was up to no good. Please AGF, or you could get in trouble. As it is, students who miss my lessons have to make it up by writing WP articles (via which WP may get new editors who would otherwise never consider editing here, and we get new viewpoints and topics covered). I'm quite able to create a new article (I've created over a hundred as you could easily find out on my page), so quite why you think I would make such a ham-fisted attempt at sock puppetry I don't know. Perhaps you should chill out a bit? I also see no COI.
 * Sorry Deb for wasting your space here with such absurdities! As for why she didn't take notice, who knows what goes on in others' heads? She was out of her depth in a new, highly-technical and intimidating area of the web. Not everyone gets WP! Malick78 (talk) 19:54, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

FYI
Hi Deb, just a note to say that I mentioned you at Sockpuppet investigations/Lyndasim. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 09:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

CleanLife Energy
Hello,
 * Are G11 and A7 the only cited reasons in deleting the page? The reasoning given to me was, "inappropriate for a variety of reasons." Please expand this reasoning so that I may improve the page following stricter NPOV guidelines and then possibly recreate the page. I read your "FAQs" but wonder why there is no constructive process of correcting or notifying others' of their mistakes, so that they may be corrected, instead of deleting immediately. I support local Cleveland economies and am happy to find notable companies to write about. With that, CleanLife is a notable company and I can prove it through references, etc. Also, from looking through my edits I can improve neutrality.  Thanks  Aeroplanepics0112 (talk) 23:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a medium of advertisement. . Kindly have the decency to refrain from creating inappropiate pages. Thereafter, read this. It will help to correct your mistakes. Wikicology (talk) 23:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The intention wasn't to use the page as an advertisement. Is it possible I go back and change the POV to be less like an advertisement and more encyclopedic, instead of losing the page so quickly? Aeroplanepics0112 (talk) 02:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * the page was deleted for multiple reasons. See it here . Its recreation will amounts to a waste of time. I suggest you should focus on other task. I hate to see your selfless efforts been wasted. Wikicology (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

ReNew Power
Continuing the above theme of power companies, the ReNew Power page has just today been re-created. I've seen far worse but does "... bagged a 57.5 MWp ground mounted grid connected Solar PV project in Madhya Pradesh in 2014", sound familiar? Just a FYI as you deleted the previous version on 23 August. . Regards, 220  of  Borg 06:06, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * , thank you for your concerned. The article was previously deleted per G11. But in its current state it can't be speedily deleted with the same criteria, althou its claims are not supported with the references supplied. Are you familiar with “ eventualism”? You can as well do some editing on it, but if you have a good rationale for its deletion, you may nominate it for deletion using AFD. Cheers Wikicology (talk) 07:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

empowering the vision project
hello, i wanted to create a wiki page on 'empowering the vision project'. it is non-profit and and non-governmental organisation and has served the Tibetan community, especially the the Tibetan youth by helping them financially, through career counselling, organising conferences and exchange programs and help the unemployed Tibetan youth to find job. i work at empowering the vision office and was told to make a wiki page of it. i made but it got deleted. i copied some materials from our website. can u please help me to make a page of empowering the vision project? students for a free Tibet has a wikipage, why can't we create one for the welfare of our Tibetan society., waiting for your reply soon.. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topchen (talk • contribs) 06:49, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * , Wikipedia is not a medium for advertisements, but an encyclopedia. Kindly have the decency to (1)  wait until someone with no COI think that your company is notable and write about it here. (2) go back to your company that you don't have an idea of what wikipedia is all about. Wikicology (talk) 07:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Delhi Public School, Khariar Road
With regard to your recent deletion of repeatedly created article Delhi Public School, Khariar Road User:Premagrawal24101990 seems to be a sock puppet of User:Premagrawal060590 Theroadislong (talk) 09:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

asking for review
Hi Deb,

You have deleted my page: Banea& Co.,the page subject was a law firm but it was not advertising. It was written in an informative and objective way, linked to many other Wikipedia pages and to other reliable sources. I have checked other law firms pages and i have followed the accepted standards. I am willing to edit the page if needed and i would like to get your review about it.

Regards,(Sepewiki (talk) 06:09, 9 September 2014 (UTC))
 * Wikipedia is not a medium of advertisement of any form. It is an encyclopedia. Meanwhile, don't want to believe that you never read the FAQ at the top of this page. If you haven't, I suggest you should go back to do so. However, Since you have a COI, you may need to follow the proccedure here if only your company is notable. But if your company is not a notable one, kindly have the decency to wait until your company is notable and someone with no COI will write about it here.Wikicology (talk) 06:47, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Dzanc Books, recreating
This is a friendly head's up. I'll be recreating the previously deleted Dzanc Books article, tomorrow or Thursday. It will have about 6-8 non-Dzanc WP:RS sources, including interviews and the like. Some information will be taken from their site (authors, imprints). I have refamiliarized myself with WP:COMPANY and WP:SPAM. I have absolutely no connection with the publisher except that I've read some of their books, and have at least three times now red-linked them. Choor monster (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * , I suggest its submission via the AFC. Otherwise, it might get deleted again. Wikicology (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't actually remember the article, but if the references are good, it should be okay. Deb (talk) 17:33, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, it's been recreated. 10 refs. Choor monster (talk) 16:45, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

AristotleTec page
Hi, I noticed you'd deleted the page AristotleTec that I was working on. I am still getting the hang of Wikipedia - could you explain why you'd deleted it?

Thanks! :) Connorgurney1 (talk) 12:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Inout Scripts
Hiya Deb, you just now deleted the page Inout Scripts as A7. Can you please block the creator of that article as obvious sock of User:Frankoch. Thanks,   Jim Carter (from public cyber)  11:55, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * P. S. User:Frankoch has repeatedly been warned for creating that same article and has been blocked. So, I ask you to block the creator as an obvious sock.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  11:55, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * See this for more information.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  11:56, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll protect the article so it can't be recreated. Deb (talk) 11:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Similar Content to Deleted Page
Hi Deb,

Thanks for the advice to use the Sandbox feature. If I eventually post an article with the same content but written differently and in a non-promotional manner (which is why I believe my page was removed),can I publish the page? Thanks! David — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGoldfeld (talk • contribs) 01:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Lectoure Royal Tannery
Lectoure Royal Tannery this is user draft article that I am working on and do not want it in mainspace yet. Please revert. Two minutes - you did not even give me time to add a usersandbox to it. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Why don't you just move it back yourself? Only this time use the correct title for the draft. Deb (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Why? You did it, so you should fix it. An what do you mean? Correct title. ww2censor (talk) 15:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)


 * correct title - ok I see what I did. ww2censor (talk) 15:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Misunderstanding
Re: your comments to me on Aerospeed's talk page. I contacted you as it appeared you had dealings with Aerospeed before. Re: Strawman #1 Yes, any Wikipedian can tag an article, I didn't contest that. Strawman#2 "Hanging offense", this is sort of a gross overstatement. If it was such I would have taken the matter up with the appropriate noticeboard. I simply took issue with tagging an article as a "blatant hoax" and "pure vandalism", per CSD G3 (i.e.assume good faith?) without taking the time to look into matters. Yes, if someone is going to tag an article they should take the time to see what it is they're doing. Aerospeed agreed with my points when I brought them to his attention and had the capacity to apologize. Now I offer the same advice to you. Please take the time to look into matters thoroughly before you use strawmen to make your points, and assume good faith, please. Btw, thanks for moving the article, I had reservations about 'Esquire'. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 16:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Page Vikram Kadian
Hi Deb,

I accept and understand your policy behind deletion of article on Vikram Kadian & Om Prakash Dhankhar. I have removed any promotional language even if remotely and resubmitted the articles.

I hope this time i have complied to all wiki guidelines.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikasguliawiki (talk • contribs) 11:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

please undelete talk page
maybe it was my mistake in the first place. If I forgot to check, if I also moved the talk page from Talk:Black Pied Dairy cattle. --PigeonIP (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Talk:German Black Pied Dairy

maybe you wanted to delete Talk:Black pied cattle, but you got to Talk:German Black Pied Dairy and deleted that instead. Your comment is (R3: Recently created, implausible redirect), but the page German Black Pied Dairy exists (and shall stay there! see the comment on the deleted talk page). --PigeonIP (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, Deb! You deleted Talk:German Black Pied Dairy; that page should (?) have had history and content associated with it. Is it possible that you had intended to delete Talk:Black pied cattle, shortly after you deleted the associated redirect page? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you --PigeonIP (talk) 18:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)


 * May you/are you able/allowed to help with that: User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ? --PigeonIP (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 26 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * On the 1945 in British music page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=627147650 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F627147650%7C1945 in British music%5D%5D Ask for help])

Scheiner Law Group
You had deleted this page. I restored some past diffs, after this was re-created as a less "spammy" version.
 * It's still a blatant advertisement, just shorter, and has all the hallmarks of a "paid for" article, an impression reinforced by the creator's other work. If no one was else has done so by the end of the day, I'm sending it to AfD. Voceditenore (talk) 14:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Would like permission to re-write Telergy Page
I rushed too quickly writing my very first article on Wikipedia, and was wondering if I could re-write a Telergy article that is based on references that can be verified, and in the correct format. I have tons of notable references and am asking for a second chance to write an article using article wizard this time. According to my talk page, it says I need to contact you before writing a new article and ask for permission. Thank you for your time, Deb. Mkdpellet3 (talk) 20:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Editing Center on International Commercial Arbitration
Hi Deb, I am in charge of editing the Washington College of Law's Center on International Commercial Arbitration page and I see it was deleted for several reasons in the past- most recently by you in January. I am hoping to recreate this page correctly pursuant to Wikipedia Standards. Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, ArbWCL (talk) 19:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Why can we not put a certain sentence?
When i put the age of when the athelete start the sport in the second paragrap, but the edits from you, is put into another paragraph. But how do we know which sentence to put in which paragraph. And can't we put where we want?

Thanks,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  02Emerald02 16:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)16:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 02Emeralds02 (talk • contribs)

Hi, Deb.

May i know why my article is not in the internet. When i type into the browser, my article is not there. Thanks

02Emerald02 16:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)16:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 02Emeralds02 (talk • contribs)

User:Turnberryisle
Hi, I'm Anupmehra. The user you recently blocked for upol violation has sent an account creation request to WP:ACC and I'm presently reviewing the same. I noticed despite you have placed a soft-block notice on the user talk page, you've applied a hard-block setting for them. I had to ask before acting on the request, is the block only made for 'username' or 'promotional editing' as well? If only username, I'll grant them an account. If including 'promotional editing', I'll decline it and request you to change the template on their user talk page (uw-spamublock?). Thank you, Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  17:58, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Amol Arora
Hi! I did try once more to edit and make the changes to the page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amol_Arora ), I hope this time it is suitable to live.

Though, I did not try to include the references to the page to avoid its deletion. Interactanand (talk) 07:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I found http://wes.eletsonline.com/2012/past-speakers-2/, a independent reference. May I take take this. Also, one of his interview was covered at http://tv.eletsonline.com/school-leadership-summit-2014-interview-amol-aroramanaging-directorshemford-futuristic-schools/

Please suggest! Interactanand (talk) 11:08, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Block of User:CranknCog Apparel
Hi! I saw your block of this user and I'm curious as to why the block was made for one year rather than indefinite? Every other case I've reported on corporate names (see this), and every case I've seen, has resulted in indefinite blocks as opposed to one year. Thoughts? --Hammersoft (talk) 15:11, 21 October 2014 (UTC) It's because she's out of practice. She's too nice to block people!!! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  11:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You're totally correct. I just can't seem to get this right.  Why does it even give us the option? :-( Deb (talk) 15:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know :) It's not a big deal. I seriously doubt the account operator will come back in a year. Just curious, not trying to be OCD :) --Hammersoft (talk) 15:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * One year blocks are handy for an editor who gets very angry and needs a cool-down period. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Angela richter
Deb, I think your deletion of Angela richter was improper. A conflict of interest is by itself not a reason to delete and I didn't think the text was promotional. In addition, is was in the process of concluding it notable, and had just linked the article to its German counterpart (I suspect the English article was a partial translation, BTW, but my German's kinda rusty). As I was trying to fix the title to capitalize the R and do some cleanup, I found it deleted. I personally think it should be restored. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't have the text to the article, so I would need you to restore it. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 19:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Deb, I need it restored with its contributions history. I didn't write it, and can't take credit for writing it. You're an administrator, you should know this. It would have been easier for everyone had you simply fessed up to your mistake and just restored it at its original title. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 15:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

I've requested a second opinion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Badke Quartet
I was really surprised that this article was deleted. I didn't write it, but the Badke Quartet is a very well-known quartet in Britain. It has been pretty extensively reviewed, and is certainly worthy of an article. They were recently appointed artists in residence at Royal Holloway University. Was there an AFD about this? Because there was nothing about the article (that I remember only vaguely) that merited even speedy delete. --Ravpapa (talk) 17:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * please do so (transfer to my sandbox). I will try to put it in decent shape. Thanks --Ravpapa (talk) 18:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Dear Deb, I have rewritten the article on the Badke quartet, it is in my sandbox ( User:Ravpapa/sandbox). You were right to have deleted it - the entire article was cribbed from their website. While I know it is a Herculean task to clear out all the garbage from Wikipedia, in the future, when you come across an article on a classical music performer or group that looks fishy, you might post to the classical music project talk page (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music). We are constantly reviewing articles like this, and are glad to help out. --Ravpapa (talk) 13:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Good job. I have some minor comments but don't want to annoy Deb I mean, who does??? so where is it appropriate? Please advise, cheers, DBaK (talk) 13:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest the article talk page. Seriously though, I trust the judgment of any third-party contributor who chooses to recreate a deleted page and improve it so I wouldn't normally even bother looking at it. For example, I'm taking your word for it that The Strad magazine is a reliable source.  Deb (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks Deb! Yes the Strad (good cartoons, recipes and celeb news, many kittens) is more or less an RS - nowhere near as good as The Brass Herald of course but will have to do in this case (goak here). Best wishes to all DBaK (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I saw that the article wasn't moved to articlespace yet, so I made the changes on my sandbox. I hope they didn't fall between the cracks. I would dispute DBaK's assessment of RS, but then I am a string player, not a tooter. --Ravpapa (talk) 18:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Deleted Page
The information input into the page i just created was written by myself, which was reference off other sites.

I am trying to create an informative page for a music artist, this is not advertisement.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConnorSafehouse (talk • contribs) 11:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Manchester Speculative Fiction
Pretty high-handed behaviour there, Deb. I'm well aware of the notability guidelines, and the article was sourced. IIRC the correct procedure is to gain a consensus on an article's notability, or lack of. I suggest you need to reconsider. --Shimbo (talk) 11:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

PERICLES FP7 project
Hi Deb, I created a new wikipedia page for the PERICLES FP7 project which was supposed to be entered here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PERICLES_FP7_Project_2013-2017 but it was again deleted. Any insight on what happened? Does it have to do with you rejecting my previous effort also? From what I gather I need to improve its notability by adding more sources, any other feedback you can provide? I have uploaded the new content in my sandbox to test it out before resubmitting. please have a look and reply in that page's talk if possible. Thank you! PERICLES-FP7 (talk) 16:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

request to have back the deleted page
Hi Deb, I wanted to know if it is possible to have back the page I created to make the changes in the central part of the text that may seem promotion or advertising or must I recreate the page from scratch? Thank you in advance Nobili Vitelleschi Camilla (talk) 08:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 4 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * On the September 1966 page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=632434533 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F632434533%7CSeptember 1966%5D%5D Ask for help])

Delightfull page
Hi Deb! I'm surprised with your deletion because I don't see advertising there and I really want to know how to correct my article. I just put all the necessary information about the company without my opinion and without promotion.. Can you help me? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria Tarrinha (talk • contribs) 14:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Delightfull page
Deb, I just want to understand where I need to change (and I agree with the phrase you gave for example) because I really don´t understand the big difference between my article and others like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boca_do_Lobo_Exclusive_Design.. I'm reading the pages you gave me and I'm a little bit confuse, sorry... Thank you so much for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria Tarrinha (talk • contribs) 17:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Delightfull page
I just use that example to understand what can I do to make a better article, not to say that that is nothing wrong with mine.. I understand what you're saying but I'm asking for help.. Can I send you another version for you to tell me if I'm in the wrong or the right way? I have another doubt about the references: those are links where I based my research from verifiable sources like journals.. what can I do better in that part? I'm sorry for the questions, thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria Tarrinha (talk • contribs) 21:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Novel notability
Hello, I would like to ask your opinion/advice on establishing notability for a handful of novels we've been going back-and-forth on the past couple of days. As you know, I've proposed additional criteria in Notability (books) and in the meantime I have attempted to include citations for these novels that meets the existing criteria. I have started discussions in the talk pages of Blood and Bone and Assail explaining the citations I've added and why I believe them to satisfy the notability criteria for books. Unfortunately, another user keeps redirecting the latter article despite my requests to discuss why in the relevant talk page. I suppose what I would like to know is: do you consider the citations as satisfying the notability requirements? And if not, why? What is the best means of communication regarding matters like this? I have reason to believe the discussion I attempted to start in the talk page was not considered before the article was redirected. Knmorgan08 (talk) 00:44, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Anthony Ilott
Hi, can you re-delete Anthony Ilott? Sorry, but the AfD was not closed here, and I accidentally recreated the page when attempting to close. Thanks. Natg 19 (talk) 07:38, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Also, can you close this AfD as well (Articles_for_deletion/Joe Gaminara)? I noticed that you deleted that article, but the AfD was also not closed. Thanks. Natg 19 (talk) 07:41, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy vs AfD
Curious as to the reason these two were Speedied when the AfD would have closed and deleted within 24 hours. I would understand on day 1 or 2, now those are left as incomplete discussions thereby invalidating or weakening a WP:G4 rationale-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(talk)  13:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but normally they get closed by the team of people who do closures of deletion discussions. I can do it though. Deb (talk) 16:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Interstyle Ceramics
Hello Deb,

After deletion of Interstyle Ceramics the first two time, i changed it to the maximum for it to be NPOV and removed any advertisement possible, now you blocked the page completely and i cannot correct my mistakes any longer. Is their a way for me to run the content by you before inserting it so i can be sure it won't be deleted? Right now, i can't create the page anymore for you to check it, you blocked me till may 2015.

Thank you for your help and i hope to get a few comments on how to join the encyclopedia.

Regards,

Webloft

Fluent Editor
Hello Deb,

I really don't understand why have you deleted my articles about FE, especially that I don't see any advertising there. Also when I added this software to the list of programs you also deleted this. Can you help me and explain me what am I doing wrong? Thank you in advance.

Best Regards, Kasia

Wim Botha
Hi Deb. You deleted the stub 3-4 miniutes after creation under A3, but we are encouraged to wait at least ten to 15 minutes before placing an A1 or A3, and I was in the process of helping expanding with info and references on this South African artist. I can't see who created the article, I assume it was not speedy tagged, but if you will tell me, I will welcome the user and suggest AfC. Best, Sam Sing! 14:52, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * You're suggesting I had no reason to delete an article that contained nothing but this text: "Wim Botha" (b.1974, South Africa) ?Deb (talk) 15:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes. And the creator is? Sam Sing! 15:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The person who has already recreated the article. Deb (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Media Savvy Page
Hi Deb. If you look at the page accurately, there is no difference from other outdoor advertising company pages. The main goal was to inform with reliable sources, and I don't see any advertising there. Could you please tell me which part you consider as Unambiguous advertising or promotion before you just deleting it. Thank you in advance.

Anodia
Please undelete this article. The bot that tagged it with copyright violation is broken. It has done the same to many of my recent articles. They all have excerpts of video game review quotes in them but no direct content copying off any site. This form of quoting is permitted and in fact encouraged as Wikipedia does not approve of misinterpreting critics words.--Coin945 (talk) 12:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Request to reinstate List of Roman quaestors
Hello

You deleted the article I started titled "List of Roman quaestors". It was an 'under construction' page and I accept should have been marked as such. Unfortunately it isn't possible to put it in a sandbox, or leave it for later, because it is a list and will only be completed over the course of time as I work through it chronologically, but having it there will allow other people to work on it too.

Could you please reinstate it and I will mark it 'under construction', thanks.

--Urg writer (talk) 20:39, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

WYG page
Hi deb,

Dont know as to why you deleted the page. I am just trying to create the page for the business. the business is also of a good size 140million revenue. think it qualifies by wikis standards please un delete page. no advertising just facts, history, projects going to be created similar to rival companies e.g http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atkins_%28company%29

thanks,

Sam hawthone

Mail
Isananni (talk) 18:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I hope this is not urgent as I'm not in a position to pick up wikipedia mail until tomorrow. Deb (talk) 18:56, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


 * My ears are the same temperature they have always been... Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  19:01, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm sorry to say it wouldn't be the first such e-mail or even the first person to send such an e-mail. (I can hardly wait for the morning now.) Deb (talk) 19:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of redirect
Deb, my redirect page was marked for speedy deletion - and it was indeed speedy. The intent was not to game the search engines, as initially stated. CSI Enterprises is the owner of both globalVCard and global-fleet brands. This corporate structure is combined in a single article; I did not feel there was enough material to support three separate articles. The redirect is simply an attempt to point users searching for globalvcard to the appropriate company page (CSI Enterprises). Is this appropriate, or is there a better way to handle? Thank you. --KristiGNA (talk) 19:14, 29 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I think the deletion was too speedy and I have re-created the page Globalvcard with a different redirect.  Biscuittin (talk) 11:53, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Fine with me. But I'd still like to see remedial work done on the main article. Deb (talk) 12:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Do you mean the "advertising"? Since these are commercial products it is difficult to describe them without using a company name or trademark. Biscuittin (talk) 17:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Most of the "references" seem to come from the company's own promotional material, and there's little evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 17:18, 30 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I'll have a closer look at it. Biscuittin (talk) 18:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I nominated it for deletion again. Once again, we're talking about a company specific term that is a very unlikely search term in an encyclopedia. Yes, some may look for it on Google, but not here. Creating this takes advantage of Google's generously high ranking of Wikipedia in search returns. Then this unlikely search term redirects to the promotional sounding material for this company; material that was put here by paid marketers. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:50, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Global-fleet
Hi, I wonder if you would look again, please, at the speedy deletion of Global-fleet? Undoubtedly, there are issues associated with the parent article CSI Enterprises. However, whilst that article survives (and I am not seeking to defend it) then Global-fleet was a valid redirect within the WP:R guideline since this brand is fully described at the target. Doubts over the redirect should, in my view, be resolved at WP:RFD. Just Chilling (talk) 20:19, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * See discussion two sections above. Deb (talk) 20:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The issues raised there need to be dealt with by fixing the target article. As the target article stands this is a valid redirect and I remain of the view that speedy deletion was inappropriate. My suggestion is to recreate and then take it to WP:RFD where the issues can be discussed. Just Chilling (talk) 20:35, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * There is nothing to stop you recreating it if you wish. Deb (talk) 20:40, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Justchilling: Can I ask what purpose it serves? Are you asserting that this company specific term is really a likely search term on Wikipedia? Google, maybe, but not here. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:15, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Anmol Andore
Not sure if "misplaced user page" is a euphemism there - I wouldn't be at all surprised if this was self-promotion, but this should really be deleted or userfied as a draft, if that's what the user presented it as. They might just be a fan or a friend, and we shouldn't mislead future editors into thinking that a Wikipedia user ever identified themselves as Anmol Andore. --McGeddon (talk) 12:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Rositsa Stefanova
Hi Deb. I was wondering why you turned down Rositsa Stefanova for WP:A7 speedy deletion. Does she meet WP:NGYMNASTICS? I wasn't able to find any sources that would make her pass the criteria. In the meantime, I've warned the creator about WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. --Drm310 (talk) 15:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

List of Senior Advocates of Nigeria
Hi, Deb! Thanks for your recent edit on the above article. You were very fast and efficient. Wikicology (talk) 15:14, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Most popular Internet search engines
Oh im sorry i made lot of coding mistakes but i fixed it.and i recreated it i believe this article should not be deleted becuase it decribes the popular search engines we use it has encyclopediac content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishnachaitan (talk • contribs) 09:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

I wish to retrieve the deleted material for future improvement
I was using my userspace to create an article on a Congressional candidate that made significant news coverage. This is allowed under Wikipedia's rules. User_pages. I should have used the Template:Userspace_draft to indicate what I was doing, and that I was not finished with my draft, but I did not know that template was available. Please help me to retrieve my deleted material so I am able to complete my article, as building an article on a userspace is allowed under Wikipedia's rules. Gabepage (talk) 16:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Creating an article on a notable person is not campaigning for them. You are out of control! Gabepage (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Please tag with double check and consideration
Thanks for you suggestion and improvement of the article. But could you please double check the the other`s contribution when you make undo. I have added new section and modified some error of the article Cloud robotics. But your undo made it worse. Thanks for your work and contribution to wiki.

Kind regards, Lijall (talk) 13:23, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

New article on financial services company
Hi Deb - thank for for your message from a while ago about the deletion of the Article on "WorldRemit". Could you provide some information as to whether or not I can share a draft with other contributors in order to let them independently review the proposed article? Otherwise do you have any specific comments on the nature of the content you deemed invalid? I would be happy to make changes accordingly. Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mschmidbaur (talk • contribs) 14:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

thanks for your message, please revert with consideration
Hi Deb, please re-read the article when you make a revert. I have added some new section and improved some sections. If you want to tag it, please put it on the new version instead of revert. Another question is that why is the article Cloud robotics regarded as an advertisement? Thanks a lot for your effort on Wiki but please respect the other`s effort as well.

Kind regards, Lijall (talk) 12:53, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

I have put it in sandbox. But could you please point out and clarify where are the problems of the additional materials? Besides, more evidence and citation that have improved the article, why did you ignore them. I also improved the format and style to make it more readable, but you reverted without any consideration.

By the way, it seems your voice and attitude is not that friendly. We are not enemies but both want to make contribution and share knowledge.

I respect your work and effort. It`s our responsibility to make a better knowledge. But it should not be a conflict world here. Hope we can respect each other.

Best regards, Lijall (talk) 14:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your detailed suggestion. I will consider about that. Since I am new on creating wiki article and missed some rules. Sorry for my careless of spellings and grammar. I have noticed that. Beside, some spelling is caused by the difference of American English and British English. Since your grammar checker may be BE baed, you can see a lot spelling mistake of the page. I have changed all that to BE if you allow so.

Best, 14:44, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for that. That`s my fault when save the modification without care. The spelling mistakes have been cleared. I will double check the grammar and cohesion later once I reviewed the related guidance.

For the conflict of interest, yes, I am one of the those who is quite interested in the research of cloud robotics. That is why I created this page. It can provide integrity source of this topic to those want to understand cloud robotics because there is no such one exists on Wiki though the topic has been proposed several years. It has become a very popular topics in our area and highlighted by many governments, organisations and media. I have published several papers and notes on this topic. I also keep the updates of research in this topic. A dilemma is that if I want to provide some evidence and reference to explain it, but the only one exists is my own work. How can I avoid it. If I remove my the reference from those related to my work. It may cause copyright problems. Even though I discard the materials from my research, the others may add it later. I have decline and avoid to refer to materials from my work but some are necessary for the concept and evidence. How can I deal with this.

Best regards, Lijall (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear Deb,

Again, the page Cloud robotics I created seems interesting that has bee viewed hundreds times a day. The unreliable references has be removed and POV of each sections now looks more natural. Each point has its reference from journal or conference papers published by academic publisher such as IEEE, ACM, governmental documents, non-profit organisation as well as open-source communities. It would be appreciate if you could review it again and provide suggestions for further improvement.

Best,Lijall (talk) 15:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletion review/Log/2014 December 7
User:Waters.Justin took User:Gabepage, which you speedily deleted, to deletion review at Deletion review/Log/2014 December 7 but forgot to notify you. Cunard (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

You forgot to sign the block message for this user. MadGuy7023 (talk) 14:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't forget, I just didn't notice that "subst" hadn't worked in this template. Deb (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

June 11 and DOTY
Please see Wikipedia_talk:Days_of_the_year  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 17:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Today a an article about German Music Band Junksista has been created, then deleted by you (code A7). I do not understand if this happened because only the name is mentioned and should be written is some other way (e.g.: Junksista(band). Otherwise I do not understand the reason. 1) The band plays for the Belgian label Alfa Matrix (see Wikipedia references in more than language for the label itself and pages for many other artists, even with a smaller discography, who play for it), and in a few years has already produced a considerable number of recordings and played live in more than one country. 2) They have worked with (and for) worldwide known artists such as Jane Badler and Uh Huh Her. 3) A page for the band already exists on Wikipedia (French) and for places (always French pages) where they played live or where were played movies for which they created a soundtrack. 4) The article describes only their history, music style and production and for all the quoted reviews and article about them, there is a reference.
 * Not sure why you are so concerned, since you didn't (apparently) write the article. But here are the criteria for notability, which the article failed to meet: Notability (music). Deb (talk) 12:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Junksista (band) page removed
Hello again. The page has been made by me but published by my friend and user A_proietti, since I was not registered yet and I am learning how to create a page correctly. About satisfied requirements, "Criteria for musicians and ensembles" mean that "A musician or ensemble may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria": 1 ( http://alfamatrix.bandcamp.com/album/a-strange-play-an-alfa-matrix-tribute-to-the-cure ) 2 ( http://www.lastfm.it/group/EBM+Radio/charts ) 10 soundtrack feat. jane Badler (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Badler ) for ( http://www.cine-media.fr/article-divers-deux-courts-metrages-made-in-france-d-exception-125165465.html ) 11 ( http://www.bln.fm/2011/07/neu-in-der-rotation-woche-242011-3/ ) 11 ( http://coma-online.com/video-day-junksista-feat-ladyhell-queer/ )


 * Don't forget to read Verifiability. Sources for these criteria must be independent and reliable - they cannot include the band's own website or other wikipedia articles. Deb (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Junksista (band) page removed
"Don't forget to read Wikipedia:Verifiability. Sources for these criteria must be independent and reliable - they cannot include the band's own website or other Wikipedia articles. Deb (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)" For what I can read, based on my English language's knowledge, band's own website is never quoted and it is only mentioned as an external link at the end of the article (as usual). Owing to what you have written, it is now your duty to mention where did it happen and the references, to prove it. As well as for what I read in it, no other Wikipedia article is quoted unless are present (as usual) links to other existing articles about artists or places mentioned (to give verifiability to the article itself).

Block
Hi. Just letting you know that I have changed this block back to indef. User has used at least 3 other accounts to recreate the hoax page and we're probably not done yet. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry, the message and the block contradicted one another. Deb (talk) 09:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Question
Hello. I was curious as to why you rolled back my edits at User talk:Sara jahan and User talk:Alamin44? Last time I checked, it was still customary to leave tracking link at talk pages of spammers... If this has changed, WikiProject_Spam should probably be removed since it still advises editors to do so. Thanks. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 15:18, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Bogobiri House
Why was this article deleted within seconds of creation without notification? I was still editing it Eruditescholar (talk) 10:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Dharam Singh Nihang Singh
Hi Deb,

I was about to create Dharam Singh Nihang Singh and for that i have bring data from several websites and about to edit and frame my own sentences but at sudden article got deleted by you. How can i continue creating article? I could not create on my desktop as due to some of my system restriction. Please help

Secondly, Sikhiwiki is also a free wiki website and is there any sort of infringement for that?

Thanks (NihangKhalsa (talk) 11:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC))

Terra Kulture and Bungalow restaurant
Hi Administrator. The articles you recently deleted were involved in the October/November AFD consensus in discussions for List of restaurants in Lagos. I am not trying to prove you wrong but i expected a notification of the issues of the articles prior to instant deletion.Eruditescholar (talk) 13:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Ruff 'n' Tumble (clothing)
Season's Greetings to you, Administrator. I inadvertently omitted mentioning this article which you deleted yesterday. I want to ask for your permission to recreate it and make it encyclopaedic by removing any form of advertising or promotional content. Eruditescholar (talk) 07:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I deleted this because you blanked the page. You can always recreate it - but remove the promotional content before you post the article, not afterwards. Deb (talk) 19:12, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Dodgy visitor
Hi Deb. I've reverted three attempts by a self-described fan of proxies to leave a rather ominous epistle on your talk page. Getting a bit tired of this, I have subsequently semi'ed your talk page for a day. Personally, I don't think the species in question needs feeding, but you may of course unprotect the page at your discretion. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Yui Mizuno
I've explained here. (If you disagree, could you maybe suggest a better wording?) --Moscow Connection (talk)

Yellow Chilli Restaurant
Thanks for contributing towards improving the article. As the creator, I least expected an AFD tag in lieu of a review tag Eruditescholar (talk) 13:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Razihel
This artist is now notable I believe, as he's part of the label Monstercat and has produced music for Chris Brown and there are many sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Au5

And artists on the same label who are far less notable already have a page so Razihel is fine? Famous7s (talk) 15:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


 * If you believe you can now demonstrate notability, there is nothing to stop you recreating the page. However, I would advise using Articles for creation if you're not sure. Deb (talk) 15:41, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

The Young Innovative Entrepreneurial Organization
Hello Deb, You have deleted the page The Young Innovative Entrepreneurial Organization, due to advertising and promotion, I don't necessarily believe that was the correct course of action, The purpose of the particular page was simply so that the public can gain information about the organization, it was targeting people who wish to join such a organization, if you continue to believe that it was promotion, could you please inform me on how I could write it in a manner which isn't considered promotion if I decide to write another page about the same topic Yours Sincerely, IsmailHassan1234 IsmailHassan1234 (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year Deb!


Happy New Year! Deb, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. NorthAmerica1000 10:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Jeetpal Yadav
Can you please look into the article Jeetpal Yadav. The CSD Template is being removed without providing any reason. Also appears to be a case of WP:SOCK.Lakun.patra (talk) 11:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Anders Hove (actor)
Hi, I noticed you patrolled the page I created. Thank you. This is my first page I have ever created. I'm not sure how I can get the categories to be where they are supposed to be. Would you be able to tell me how to do that? Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!
Deletion of Cedarsong Nature School article.

Hi Deb,

I don't know if you had a chance to actually take a good look at the article, because it was not there for longer than two minutes before you deleted it. Cedarsong is a notable institution in that it is the first Forest Kindergarten in the US and, as such, has been featured in People Magazine, Sierra Club, ABC News Nightline, Al Jazeera America, Fox News, and Daybreak (the precursor to Good Morning Britain), and yet there is no mention of it in Wikipedia. Is it the topic or the writing that bothered you - that is to say, if I were to rewrite it trying to have an even more neutral point of view (which I was attempting to do), would it pass muster? I have no connection to the school and have no reason to promote it other than that it is in a field that is of interest to me, the whole outdoor education, nature immersion, forest kindergarten movement in the US.

I would like to understand because if I write about other schools that have made a mark in this field, I would hate to have them deleted as well.

Thanks for any advice. BTW - I did read the guidelines and thought that I had followed them, I am very familiar with Wikipedia.

Best regards,

Thomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cesanth (talk • contribs) 12:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Improve distribution?
Hi, I just saw your edits to July 20, removing various people from the Births and Deaths sections. You said to see the project talk page (which I guess must be Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the year), but I couldn't see the section that discussed this. Please can you point me in the right direction? Thanks. &#8209;&#8209; xensyria T 15:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's here: Wikipedia_talk:Days_of_the_year Deb (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Cheers, I'll keep the discussion centralised there. &#8209;&#8209; xensyria T 21:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Estee Annerl Shiraz
Hi Deb! You deleted the page Estee Annerl Shiraz for advertising/promotional text. I am not the person writing about myself, so I have no intention to promote anything. Can you please help me make the article sound neutral? I don't know what else to fix. Also, the article was tagged as an orphan, how do I fix that? I thought you fix it by adding hyperlinks to other pages within the text.

Thank you so much, Msasor (talk) 18:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Masor

Rachel5195629605
Hi Deb, Can I please re write Wealth Management Canada? It was deleted for lack of importance. But it is important because it is the only one of these types of companies in Canada. the only other one is in the UK. I am a finance student and think it's important this page be posted. I can change it slightly but it should simply describe what the company is built to do. I can also add the UK company to external sources so users can see the only 2 companies that find a wealth manager for people.

Rachel5195629605 (talk) 21:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Rachel5195629605

Deleted Justin Bock
Justin Bock is a Famous Musician and martial artist why was this page deleted?

Dedlocksinger — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dedlocksinger (talk • contribs) 11:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

vivaldi
sua edição do vivaldi (web browser) foi revetida ,guibofiicial,9 fevereiro 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guibofficial (talk • contribs) 13:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Restore Fat-stem
Can you please restore Fat-stem? The article was tagged db-nocontent while the author was smack in the middle of composing it, and I had just had this exchange with the person who'd placed the tag, who said it was inadvertent, that he'd forgotten to take the time zone into account. I had already removed the tag and was in the middle of adding a note to the article's Talk page reassuring the author that everything was fine when you deleted the article and the talk page out from under me! —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I won't restore it, but I will userfy it. Deb (talk) 16:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of DiameterJ Page
Hello, I put up a page yesterday about DiameterJ (in my sandbox not an actual article) that was not very encyclopedic in its entry; and it was deleted which I felt like was reasonable. However, I went back and edited the page to be nothing but the facts about DiameterJ, a free plugin for ImageJ, and it was deleted again. The reason that was given was because it was a clear promotion/advertisement. However, I don't feel like my article promoted the software, at least not intentionally. It stated what the application was, what it worked with, and what it did. I did my best to have the entry have no discussion of why it was good or bad, or any other "promotional" wording. Also, to further confirm what I had written there were two citations linked to sites and publications that confirmed the information in the article. So, I guess my question is, if this is considered promotional, how could I word this to be considered not promotional? Or stated another way, what in this article did you consider promotional? I'm new to content creation on Wikipedia, but I am willing to change/improve anything you point out as advertising or promotional.

Thank you for your time and help, and I'm sorry I couldn't figure out how to do this correctly on my own!

Nathan Hotaling (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of my article
Hi i know the most sounds like the bio from IMDb but I know his publicist and it's ok to be so. Offexp (talk) 17:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Editing of DiameterJ page - Thanks!
Hello Deb, thank you for your direct approach to helping me fix my article. After reading over your links and doing a little thinking I've revised my approach. Rather than focusing solely on DiameterJ. I'll write an article on Nanofiber diameter quantification methods. In it DiaemterJ can be mentioned along with every other type of quantification/method that is available. Thanks for your patience I really appreciate you taking the time to spell it out for me. As an aside, I feel as though if my page was promotional so is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CellProfiler but who am I to judge :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathan Hotaling (talk • contribs) 18:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Preetgora
Hi Deb.. Can you please look into article Preetgora ? Lakun.patra (talk) 14:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Bright Kids
We conflicted here - as you left a note about their username, I was blocking them, because I reckoned their edits meant they were only here for promotional purposes. So I have over-written your note advising changing username with the block notice. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Pandui Raj
Pandui is a Village in Jehanabad Block in Jehanabad District of Bihar State, India. It belongs to Magadh Division. It is located 6 KM towards South from District head quarters Jehanabad. 5 KM from Jehanabad. 61 KM from State capital Patna %0A%0APandui Pin code is 804433 and postal head office is Pandooi. %0A%0AShahpur ( 2 KM ), Amain ( 3 KM ) , Mandil ( 4 KM ) , Nerthua ( 5 KM ) , Kaswan ( 5 KM ) are the nearby Villages to Pandui. Pandui is surrounded by Kurtha Block towards South, Ratni Faridpur Block towards west , Makhdumpur Block towards South , Kako Block towards East. %0A%0AJehanabad, Makhdumpur , Masaurhi , Islampur are the nearby Cities to Pandui.%09%0A%0AThis Place is in the border of the Jehanabad District and Arwal District. Arwal District Kurtha is South towards this place. Also it is in the Border of other district Patna .%0A%0ADemographics of Pandui%0A%0AMaithili is the Local Language here. %0AHOW TO REACH Pandui%0A%0ABy Rail%0A%0AJahanbad Court Rail Way Station, Mai Halt Rail Way Station are the very nearby railway stations to Pandui. How ever%09Gaya Jn Rail Way Station is major railway station 45 KM near to Pandui %0A%0A%0A%0ASchools in Pandui%0A%0AP.s.jamanbigha%0AAddress : pandui, jehanabad , jehanabad , Bihar. PIN- 804433, Post - Pandooi%0A%0A%0AM.s.pandui%0AAddress : pandui , jehanabad , jehanabad , Bihar. PIN- 804433, Post - Pandooi Singh Pranav Kumar 03:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

All information is right. Singh Pranav Kumar 03:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranavtat09 (talk • contribs)

Edit war
It appears that you are engaging in an edit war with User:Redsky89 (February 3, February 4, etc.). Please settle whatever disagreement on content you have. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 10:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Dates
Hey. I've noticed that you've been purging date articles of, in your words, "removing individuals who are not internationally known". You cite Project talk pages. I've checked different WikiProject talk pages, but I couldn't find the relevant discussions. Out of curiosity, could you link the discussions which discussed this? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's here: Wikipedia_talk:Days_of_the_year Someone else asked the same question a few inches up the talk page. Deb (talk) 14:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

11 London
Hi - please could you restore a copy of this article to my Drafts? One of the other editors said that the article didn't make the grade because the company is new (but it's actually a rename of one that is 8 years old) and that it cited social media sources such as Linked In. If I removed these sources and just kept the others, would that give it a better chance? Sorry, am new to this. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunter190676 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Febuary deletion log
I screwed up the creation. I forgot to preface my user space to the red link. Would you please userfy the page or is there some issue with tracking my errors? Thanks and sorry for the trouble. JBH (talk) 16:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Well, it seems that you are the enforcer of speedy deletion, having deleted an entry without reading it to determine if further editing was warranted. Article, Stentorians, a black Fraternal Organization of the LAFD, which was to be placed within fraternal orders, US. You'll have to justify your action by stating why an entry deserves to be deleted withing 30sec of being posted; how it is not related to Segregation, Discrimination and otherwise Racist exclusion by not meeting your standards for entry into the common forum. CaptJayRuffins.
 * Yeah, right.Deb (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your answer was also speedy, I seem to be conversing with a bot. Please confirm that you are human.

not human... then, for the record, A7 No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events) Not only is the organization a longstanding member of the fraternal orders of the Los Angeles Fire Dept, it's members include prominent persons involved it the fight to promote diversity from the 1956 integration of the LAFD and members of the NAACP, IABPFF and other organizations currently involved in the current fight to diversify all fire depts across the country. You're trying to suppress a tale that transcends racial boundaries, and you will fail. For the record. CaptJayRuffins, FDNY — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptJayRuffins (talk • contribs) 15:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Denver Stevenson
Just to let you know that Romsey Refurbishment got deleted at about the same time you warned the author/creator about advertising. &mdash;George8211 / T 18:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I know - I deleted it! Deb (talk) 18:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:OOPS -- but more seriously, they're going on a rampage now. &mdash;George8211 / T 18:45, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * See User:George8211/logs/CSD log -- they're just going through it recreating the pages with their promo. That's a new approach to spamming. &mdash;George8211 / T 18:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, but someone's already blocked them - thanks, though. Deb (talk) 18:48, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Yoshendi
Hello! I acknowledge why you have deleted my page "Yoshendi", but it is still my personal belief that Yoshendi balls so hard, he is significant enough to be entitled to one article on Wikipedia. No matter how much we disagree, we can both agree on the fact that he does ball fairly hard. Thanks for your time.

Suck a dick, Deb, Yoshendi — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlphaZebraTree (talk • contribs) 16:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

It is certainly apparent that, in the context of your attitude, 'balls' is the operative word  Fortuna  Imperatrix Mundi  17:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)



Categories for years in literature
We have got a few categories about the centuries of years, such as Category:Years of the 19th century in Scotland, that would allow us to create Category:Years of the 19th century in literature, Category:Years of the 20th century in literature, etc. as well. I am thinking of creating them. Kindly let me know. Thanks.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Recentism
Walter Görlitz has reverted our editing three times so far on August 2 in re anti-recentism updates (see ). He may end up undoing all of them unless we can defend the campaign. Quis separabit? 21:36, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

In the interim I have reverted my edits to the last stable prior version, in some cases the last stable version is yours. I did not do so out of pressurisation from anybody but rather because I feel I don't have the proper boundaries and my removals were becoming unreliable in trying to be faithful to the project complicated by my OCD, which only means that I need to be consistent. I have too many open questions regarding, in particular, sports figures, musicians and television personalities. I am more than happy to redo my old work and continue on once I have this settled. In the meantime, Best Wishes. Yours, Quis separabit?  23:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Also, btw: I came across an editor, Yanieborja, who has been adding a considerable number of names of individuals that I am fairly sure you would otherwise be deleting as trivial. Just so you can keep an eye out. The editor is a possible sock puppet and has a long list of sanctions (see ). Yours, Quis separabit?  23:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks, yes, I have noticed this user. He is presumably from the Philippines as he is adding people from the Philippines and nowhere else - in some cases, it's doubtful whether the individuals are even notable enough to be on wikipedia. Deb (talk) 09:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I reverted some of his/her edits, which appear to cover entries on almost every day of the calendar year so far as I have noticed, in order to keep the listings from becoming too unbalanced. Yours, Quis separabit?  16:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Eric Van
Fairly significant statistician for the Red Sox. Not sure why you believe article was inflammatory. Would like a further explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasperflax4 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * BORING!Deb (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Please read carefully and minutely... Please don't mind...

Comments below were added by an anon
I don't have keen knowledge about Wikipedia, but love to visit this site everyday for any knowledge related issue. I like to edit or add for few features of articles where I have clear & clean knowledge. I don't know whats the problem with Cool TV - Tv for everyone & Wazobia TV - Na We Re, whenever I write, it comes under any deletion policy, maximum time it comes under as promotional page. May I know, promotional of what, the channel promotion, ya any character's promotion.

You can find, if you want to see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_television_stations_in_Africa Here in Nigeria, One channel - two formats and 2 times in column 1) Channels TV 2) Channels Television (website)

where maximum channel have got red in color, even more channel in black rather red. If your policy is like that, then one day will come, very sorry to say - Wikipedia will be vanished from visitors mind. It is not a web page, even it is not encyclopedia, It is visitor's choice of knowledge with perfection and 3D (Devotion, Dedication & Determination).

you know why I am trying, still trying to add in Wikipedia about two channels. I am from India, these two channel from Nigeria and I've got offer from this channel. As my family, friends and colleagues want knowledge from Wiki and Wikipedia provides only truth, that's why this is my effort. I will try my last day.


 * I placed some comments on the talk page of the contributor who created the two articles referred to above, explaining what he needed to do. I don't know whether he has read my advice or not.  I am not the bad guy here.Deb (talk) 16:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Elevator to the Gallows
You edited this article in the past. I invite you to a move discussion. --George Ho (talk) 01:15, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Charlotte, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Associates
Greetings. On my talk page, you wrote that "A single link to an external source will not enable your article to meet the verifiability standards.", but I do not see any mention of how many links are required. How many links do I need to include to satisfy the requirement?

Also, just in case verifiability standards require more links than I can find, would it be OK to create a business stub in it's place? Perhaps another editor could assist. --Xyzerb (talk) 23:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC) Hello De please is it possible you revert the Kessben article from deletion so I can work on it again and improve it?--Rberchie (talk) 10:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Thanks Deb I will do as you say and call on you anytime I need any help regards--Rberchie (talk) 13:01, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Bazaar Cart
...Has been recreated...complete with speedy delete tag. Funny old world, innit.TheLongTone (talk) 16:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh, and thanks for the contribution on the ANI concerning me (if I'm allowed to do that without violating some protocol). Very fair: Nemes' behaviour is a red rag to a bull, and even though as bulls go I'm a real wuss, there's a limit to the amount of tramping around with red flannel than I can tolerate.TheLongTone (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of UltraDEX Wikipedia page
Hi Deb, I hope you are well. I am contacting you in regards to the UltraDEX page which you deleted almost a few minutes after I submitted the final version. I spent a long time creating that page which no advertisement but with legitimate references. I was lead to create the page for UltraDEX due to the company not being listed on List of toothpaste brands. I have added UltraDEX to the List of toothpaste brands as you can see at the bottom of the list. Could you please advise me on how to find the page I created, so I can edit it to ensure it abides with the Wikipedia Policy. Akvaland (talk) 12:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Jodihost CDN
Hello DEB,

Please, advice me kindly what exactly is missing for this article to be published and not deleted. Thank you in advance. I added more references but still i am not sure.

Nomination of Franz Sparry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franz Sparry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Franz Sparry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 13:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

PROD
Allison Moore (voice actress)

The funniest thing on Wikipedia I have ever read
Your talk page is awesome. Good to see an admin not afraid to delete junk articles. Jcmcc450 (talk) 09:13, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It's a bit like watching Aliens again. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  12:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * What, you mean they change shape but they're always essentially the same? Deb (talk) 12:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * And they just keep on coming back... <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  13:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I was thinking the same thing! If there isn't some kind of Wikipedia award for Most Whiners Attracted to a Talk Page, there ought to be, & Deb ought to get it. I don't know how you can put up with the same questions over & over again. Maybe you need ginormous font on the FAQs to get people to actually read them? ScarletRibbons (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I actually copied the idea of a FAQ section (not the content) from another admin. Unfortunately, I can't remember who it was! Deb (talk) 12:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Why you delete my page? "Lady Donna McCausland" You know? I create this page for 3 weeks! And today are public I hate you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterwell (talk • contribs) 11:19, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Now this
...is good for a SoH!!! <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  15:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Coptic Medical Society
What was the reason for you to delete the above non profit charitable society page, can you kindly restore it please.(Raafat (talk) 01:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC))
 * Nope. I wasn't even the last person to delete it.  Read the FAQs at the top of this page.  Being a charity doesn't give you the right to an article. Deb (talk) 07:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Richard III
Re: WP Death; I suppose this is redundant on Richard III's biography page since there is a separate article on his Death and reburial.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 11:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd say so. Deb (talk) 12:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It's still there <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  13:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

AppDirect page
Hi Deb, I would just like to find out which part(s) of our part seem like advertising. The publishing of the article is meant for a school project, and we are not familiar with the workings of Wikipedia, thus would really appreciate your comments. We have just edited some parts of our article and recreated it, do look through and tell us if there are any parts that need changes or edits.

Thank you and hope to hear from you soon. Shiyingg (talk) 09:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Replied on your talk page.Deb (talk) 10:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Dispute resolution Your intervention
You added dispute citations to The Stentorians. Please explain your position in talk, citations added. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Goldstein, Hill & West Architects
In your summary deletion of this article, I don't believe that you were in full possession of the facts, and because of this your action was precipitous. Would you please go to User:Diannaa's talk page and discuss the issue there? The link to the thread I started there is here. Thank you. BMK (talk) 07:57, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It looks much better now it's had all that icing sugar dusted off, doesn't it. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  10:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Dennis Silk
Dear Deb, I've responded on my talk page. Thanks in advance, Brian Bmcln1 (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

WP:CANVASS
I suggest you start off your admin refresher course with a read of WP:CANVASS, since you just went to anotyher admin -- one whose opinion, I am certain, you knew would agree with yours -- to get the "Partners" section of Goldstein, Hill & West Architects deleted. All this without ever participating in the article's talk page -- how you ever square this behavior with being an admin is really beyond me. BMK (talk)
 * Note: This comment comes from an editor who specifically requested further opinions on the talk page of the article in question - and now doesn't like it because he got them. Deb (talk) 11:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * My dialogue with this user now appears to be at an end as he has "banned" me from writing on his Talk page. So I am copying below the comments he deleted from that page.

"Your talk page is not a personal soapbox to enable you to make veiled accusations of bias against a third party without informing him - but administrators are used to this kind of mud-slinging from people who believe they know our job far better than we do even though they have never put themselves forward for the responsibility (not that I ever put myself forward for it either). Not being an admin leaves you free to use bad language, create bad articles, and make pretty much any accusation you like against an administrator without bothering too much about the facts.  However, just in case there is anyone reading this who takes your comments about my own promotion to administrator at face value, I would point out that I didn't get six support "votes" - in fact, I didn't get any "votes" - because there was no voting at the time of that exercise.  It was done by consensus, and had to involve at least one existing administrator. In June 2003 there were only 85 administrators on the project in total, out of a total of around 1300 active users. As you know, the total of active users is now around 134,000 and there are 1,355 admins. Exponential growth has resulted in many changes in the selection process; not everyone believes that the present system works any better." Deb (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * So admins in 2003 were 6.5% of the populace, whereas now they are ~1%. So pro rata you had greater support then than the equivalent today. That certainly clears things up <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  11:14, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not quite suggesting that I had "greater" support, but that the implication that I am not a proper admin because the process was different in those days appears to be based on a comparison between apples and cheese. :-) Deb (talk) 11:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Tags on Albrecht Lanz
Hi Deb, thanks for taking the time to patrol the page. You added three tags, notability, source reliability, and no categories. Obviously you were correct to add the no cats tag, but I would dispute the first two. This bloke was the commandant of 163,857 people (well, probably around 100,000 as that's today's figure). He controlled the Channel Islands for a time, and got the highest award for valour, the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross (which makes him notable per WikiProject MILHIST guidelines). Is it OK if I remove the tags? Thanks, Jerseyman abroard (talk) 09:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * (Just realised the source reliability tag wasn't addressed above. I'll correct my mistake shortly. Thanks, Jerseyman abroard (talk) 09:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC))
 * There are three sources: the Guernsey Occupation Museum, which backs up dates used in source 2. Source 2, Barry Turner's book Outpost of Occupation, is probably notable in its own right, having been reviewed in The Mail and by discussed by the BBC. Source 3, Eastern Inferno by Hans Roth is published by Casermate Publishers, a company which publishes military books. Therefore, I am afraid that I cannot see either notability issues or source issues here. Thanks, Jerseyman abroard (talk) 10:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I replied on my talk. Thanks for the quick response, Jerseyman abroard (talk) 11:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Ramage Inc deletion.
H Deb, i understand that you're here to keep wiki clean and nonsense free. I also understand that i'm new here. Can you explain how band that exists for more than 10 years, released critically acclaimed albums have thousands of fans worldwide, played countless gigs and generally means a lot to many people was deemed by you not relevant? Article was written in informative non biased way. Who is to decide what is significant? Please reconsider. If you think that content could be improved please point out where mistakes been made. Best regards, Humscum.


 * Please read WP:BAND. If you can demonstrate that they meet the criteria, please provide references to demonstrate this.Deb (talk) 12:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb, Ramage Inc meet at least 4 or 5 criteria from the list. How should i do it to meet wiki requirements? I'm genuinely asking for help here? Humscum

Chris.let (talk) 14:04, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Hi Deb Please give me a chance - you deleted my page 2 minutes after I started writing it :) - Gus Borgeest

Corporate Election Services
Wikipedia says to admins to "see talk page". There was "talk" on the "talk page". Nothing was copywrite vio. I look forward to reposting this article again soon with your full endorsement. <sup style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;"> Market St.⧏ <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;"> ⧐ Diamond Way  16:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes I'm looking forward to that too. <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  16:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You'll have a long wait, unless it's re-written in non-promotional language. Deb (talk) 17:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I appreciate finally someone discussing the concern, tho the proper place for this discussion would be the article's now deleted talk page. I still await any specific example.  The article has more than enough RSs, and is far less promotional then say the lede to New York City.  Before we all get too deep here I'd like to point out for future reference, the article wasn't deleted because of unsubstantiated promotional language but because of unsubstantiated copy vio, so why are we discussing promotional language?  "Promotional language" disagreement could have been handled with notices on those specific parts of the text, or a temporary removal of text an editor felt was "promotional" pending consensus on the article's talk page.  I might be surprised to learn how the article was promotional or copy vio, but nothing I know about wikipedia would merit an article as this was being deleted, let alone speedily.  Please reconsider this rash decision. <sup style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;"> Market St.⧏ <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;"> ⧐ Diamond Way   18:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Picked up from editors note at (with response):User_talk:Marketdiamond <sup style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;"> Market St.⧏ <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;"> ⧐ Diamond Way  19:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Now restored and ready to be re-written. Deb (talk) 10:37, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Gangsta bitch barbie listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gangsta bitch barbie. Since you had some involvement with the Gangsta bitch barbie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Gypsy Philharmonic Orchestra - undelete
Please, see my mail for the authorization copyright. Could you undelete the page please ?

Look to this website : http://www.100violins.com This is the official website for the Gypsy Philharmonic Orchestra.

All the best, Cypress Music Arthur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cypress music (talk • contribs)


 * Hi Deb, an email was received as ticket 2015041810000271. Though there is one thing to resolve before declaring it completely accepted, it is sufficiently resolved for it to not be G12 - unambiguous copyright infringement.  As such, I have restored the article and moved it to the better capitalized Gypsy Philharmonic Orchestra.  If you would like to re-delete it as A7 or G11, please feel free to do so with my blessing. --B (talk) 00:36, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Advertising vs. deletion on "Quick-and-dirty" article
I think there has been a miscommunication. I recommended that the "Quick-and-dirty" article be deleted because:
 * 1) Quick-and-dirty is a colloquialism and Wikipedia is not a dictionary
 * 2) The article is fiction
 * 3) The article cites no sources.

Your response was to say that I added advertising to the article and therefore it should not be deleted? I don't know what I changed in the Microsoft paragraph, but I did not write it. Is that story even true? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quick-and-dirty&diff=641152241&oldid=575257546

I'm willing to help clean up this mess, but I could use additional guidance:
 * 1) Why does "Quick-and-dirty" deserve to be an article in Wikipedia?
 * 2) What about deleting this article constitutes advertising?

If you can answer those questions, I can use the link to the Oxford English Dictionary and the first use of the term in print to provide sources for a (very short) fact-based version of this article.

P.S. I think most people who repair things and speak English use this phrase. I've been programming for fun and profit for 36 years and don't see what makes it specific to computer programming. GlenPeterson (talk) 15:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

I didn't hear back from you, so I marked it for deletion again.GlenPeterson (talk) 19:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Good work. Cheers! <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  10:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion review for Brad Kroenig
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Brad Kroenig. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Brenhunk (talk) 19:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Chinese Kinship Terms
Hello, Deb. I'm trying to create a webpage for the Chinese kinship terms. It's not original research. The reference is the kinship diagrams found in the "Oxford Chinese Dictionary" (2010). I was going to add a reference for it, but I couldn't finish writing. Let me know if you decide to reopen it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabriberloco (talk • contribs) 08:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of M.E.Aldrich Rope
Dear Deb: Please can this page be restored? It uses copyright material of which I am the copyright holder as I stated on the talk page as soon as the copyright issue was raisedPangapilot (talk) 15:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Thank you for the speedy restoration but I believe I have already dealt with the copyright issue by stating that I own the copyright to the material from my website. What more do I need to do? Pangapilot (talk) 17:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It's now here; perhaps have a look at the discussion on the talkpage? <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  13:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Marcos Vinícius de Jesus Araújo
Hi there,

I saw your move in the mentioned article, and I undid it. Why? See Soccerway. There's plenty of Marcos Vinícius, especially in Brazilian football. The page Marcos Vinícius must be a disambig, not an exclusive one for this player.

Cheers, MYS  77  ✉ 14:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay. Go to it! Deb (talk) 17:25, 11 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Done. Thanks for your understanding. Cheers, happy week. MYS  77  ✉ 19:53, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Smokestack Hardy
Just a bit confused about the short article which was misnamed SMOKESTACK HARDY which was deleted. It was a mistake to used all caps in the title, but once done I couldn't correct it. Now I'm confused, the full article was moved to the user space user:BeeCeePhoto/SMOKESTACK HARDY and was over 1000 words, not exactly a short article??? Robco311 11:28, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, got your reply, can we work together to solve this? Robco311 11:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeeCeePhoto (talk • contribs)

Dodge67 found it at User:BeeCeePhoto/Smokestack Hardy and deemed it not up to par. So far I've got notability, and needs work. what's your take? Robco311 12:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

I improved it enough to be at draft... Draft:Smokestack Hardy Can you opine?? I also cannot fix the infobox, i've tried markup changes but it won't format.. Robco311 15:39, 14 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeeCeePhoto (talk • contribs)

deletion of vasiti.com i have reviewed the article and have re written it to avoid and violation of policy or regulations. these are my 1st articles so i may mayb rusty and would realy appreciate if you csn edit the page. if need be. munachi ogueke--Munachi ogueke (talk) 18:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Temple Beth Am
Hello. You deleted Temple Beth Am in 2011. I have created a userpage at User:Zigzig20s/Temple Beth Am (Los Angeles, California) and I would like to move it to mainspace. Could you please let me know if it looks fine to you or if it needs more work to pass muster? I don't want it to get deleted once it's been moved. Please reply on my talkpage. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 13:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Phrase
Thank you for the phrase "wanting to throw your weight around", ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

evision
What!?--Ridland (talk) 10:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * What?Deb (talk) 10:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roger Thomas


A tag has been placed on Roger Thomas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Why nominate a DAB page for SD? <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  12:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Because it had apparently been changed by some new editor to a page for some obscure person of that name, but the nominator didn't check back through the page history. All sorted now. Deb (talk) 18:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

"Concilium Search" page
Hello Deb,

I created an entry for "Concilium Search" today and everything is fine. However I accidently did not capitalise the word "search" in the main page title. How do I change this, so it reads "Concilium Search" instead of "Concilium search" with a capital 'S' please?

Best regards, RichardMoore80 (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Princes in the Tower
I don't understand how you can view Hicks, Weir, etc as being neutral then say Carson's views are somehow less than the others cited. There are more I did not add.

In that case, how do I dispute the neutrality of an article? AnneAnneAnne1485 (talk) 02:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

urgent notice
I don't understand how can someone view this page you moved without redirect please rectify  this article as soon as possible Samat lib (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

yes but the article dont show on google, when you click the link , please rectify this error as soon as possible Samat lib (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Head>desk DBaK (talk) 19:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Nico Santora
Hey, I'm inclined to agree with you in regards to Nico Santora though, there just might be some notability there. I realize that ideally, articles wouldn't be drafted in mainspace but perhaps if we give him the chance he can muddle though and come up with something useful. I've BLP PRODed it and will keep an eye on it. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   21:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

urgent notice
I would like to assert the significance of RentFax. It has been featured in the news. Furthermore, RentFax has been compared to HomeVestors of America, a real estate corporation that is featured in Wikipedia at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomeVestors_of_America. They both, RentFax and HomeVestors of America, have been compared and featured in the news. Please advice.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Reina riemann (talk • contribs) 22:51, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * In what way is your comment relevant to the deletion of your article for advertising?Deb (talk) 06:39, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

New Page - Under Construction - Owner of site
Hi Deb,

I see the end of your note about using talk instead of email to contact you.

I don't understand why creating a page for an email service is a problem.

I edited a webmail comparison page that includes other services such as Gmail and Yahoo Mail.

Instead of that linking to a blank page I started a page but it was clobbered as spam before I could continue since I didn't have it tagged "under construction".

Similar startups from the past year are allowed to have pages. The page I was working on has unique encryption/privacy features that those services don't have.

If I can't create and work on building pages for the newer email services, who should be creating them?

I own a email support site and planned on creating and/or updating the pages for several email services that are mentioned but don't have pages yet.

I don't envision anyone else taking a day of their own time to get it done.

I can't imagine it was a 3rd party creating some of the other service pages I see listed.

The owners were allowed to get their pages for services they own created. I'm creating as a 3rd party which seems to be what you prefer anyways.

Thank you, Raymond Popowich (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Update, in response to your reply:

Hi Deb,

The page I was using as a guide to start the page for SCRYPTmail is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProtonMail

The Wikipedia page that prompted me to create a new page was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_webmail_providers

My plan was to help update the comparison of webmail providers page and create the missing pages for newer email services as needed.

I believe in email security / privacy / encryption and intended to focus on getting those types of services listed too.

Thank you, Raymond Popowich (talk) 15:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Update, in response to your reply:

I understand. I was not given a chance to complete the page. It was deleted after my first edit and hardly started.

My other edit on the web services page is gone now too. I'm loosing interest in helping Wikipedia.

I thought it would be fun to contribute. I spend lots of time creating forum based documentation. This didn't seem too different.

I still want to contribute. I'm happy to work on some other pages. Would you like to select and suggest some pages that need work?

If for some reason you don't want contributors who are knowledgeable in their fields contributing because they're associated with the field, that's fine, a bit strange, but let me know.

(I think) I sent you a LinkedIn request so you can see what companies I'm associated with, which I'm not, and my experience.

Raymond Popowich (talk) 19:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, -Ray

Christian - 123ContactForm
Hi Deb,

A little while back (March) I created the 123ContactForm Wiki page but after evaluation it was deemed inappropriate, therefore I remade it. How will it work from here? The text is in my sandbox, would you mind checking to see if it's appropriate? Let me know, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian2907 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Gotta love their snappy slogan!  <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  10:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * BUFOFTGR! Deb (talk) 11:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)