User talk:Debaditya2000

Unspecified source/license for File:Dr-ashoke-sen-2016-d986cr-aaezine.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dr-ashoke-sen-2016-d986cr-aaezine.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 10:45, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Edit of the infobox of Paul Erdős
Your edit of the infobox of Paul Erdős is disputed and I have reverted it twice. The reason for which I disagree is mainly your wrong conception of the field "known for". MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE states explicitly that the purpose of an infobox is to summarize the main facts that are detailed in the article. The very long collapsed list that you have added is not a summary and contains many things for which Erdős is not known (such that the prizes and awards named after him. Such a list is normally placed (and is) in a list article links here.

So please, stop these changes that do not improve the article. If you thing that some part of your edits are really useful, you have to follow the rules of WP:BRD, that is, open in the talk page of the article a discussion in which you explain which changes seems useful, and for which reasons they are useful. Then other editor can give their opinion, and a final decision will be taken if a consensus is reached. If no consensus is reach, the article must remain in the previous state. Again, please follow Wikipedia rules. D.Lazard (talk) 12:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Kolmogorov's theory of 1941
Your edits to Kolmogorov's theory of 1941 appear to be copied from this site.

That source is acceptably licensed, but you must provide proper attribution with a reference.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  14:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)