User talk:Debbie1920

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that she meets the notability guidelines. (oIt is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to her, social media, IMDB and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what she claims or interviewing her or her management. Most of your text was completely unreferenced, and the only refrence was just quoting her, not an independent third-party source
 * On what you tell us, I'm not sure that she meets our notability criteria anyway, she seems to have dabbled in various things without making much of a mark, even if what you tell us is true
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: gained recognition... a leading role in BLUR... still made her mark... set to appear on the first full season... left an impression in the modelling industry... gracing... a role model... self proclaimed to be "Canada's Best Model". and so on, it's a press release, not an encyclopaedia article
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * I note that you have never edited this or any other article. Please read Your first article so you understand how things work. Also not that the article has been deleted three times, and if unsourced promotional material is posted on that page again, I'll permanently block it from recreation
 * How do we correct that? &mdash;Who is "we"? If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for her, or otherwise are acting on her behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by her or her management, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)