User talk:Debgarratt

Your edits
Your recent editing history at Priscilla K. Coleman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Your edits do not appear to be "removing factual errors"; they appear to be removing accurate, appropriately sourced, and relevant critical material about the article subject. Please come to the article talk page (at Talk:Priscilla K. Coleman and specify which factual errors you believe exist in the article, so that they can be corrected. MastCell Talk 04:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Before you continue re-adding material to, please take a look at this site's policy on biographical articles. If you want to add material, then you need to supply a suitable reliable source for it. Specifically, please don't keep adding the material about Coleman's number of publications etc. without supplying a suitable reliable source to support it. If you'd like help identifying appropriate sources or discussing the material you'd like to add, please leave a note at the article talk page. If you keep re-adding this unsourced material to the biography, then your account is likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia, as doing so violates this site's policies. MastCell Talk 05:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Abortion articles, broadly construed, are subject to a 1RR restriction. This means that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours.

If you are unsure of whether or not an article or an edit falls under this sanction, please ask an uninvolved administrator.

Please visit Edit warring for more information about what types of edits are or are not considered reverts for the purpose of 1RR, and Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion for more information about the sanctions, including standard discretionary sanctions, on abortion-related articles. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 04:47, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Notice of edit-warring report
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MastCell Talk 03:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Priscilla K. Coleman with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Priscilla K. Coleman
Stop removing valid sourced content. You are white-washing the article. 07:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)