User talk:Debjyoti1981

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Callanecc (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nouniquenames (talk) 17:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mrityunjoy Prasad Guha concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mrityunjoy Prasad Guha, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mrityunjoy Prasad Guha concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mrityunjoy Prasad Guha, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mrityunjoy Prasad Guha concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mrityunjoy Prasad Guha, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mrityunjoy Prasad Guha has been accepted
 Mrityunjoy Prasad Guha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ~Kvng (talk) 17:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Debjyoti1981 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

January 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Zero (2018 film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diffs: In a neutral encyclopedia, we don't use exaggerated language, describing things as "miserable" or "disasters" or "flops" or "failures" or "trainwrecks" or "shit storms" or "blockbusters" or "super hits" or any of that. Your contribution wasn't in line with our quest for neutrality. We also don't use cutesy industry slang like "snubbed" or "roped in" or things like that. If you want to try to resubmit the content in a neutral, professional phrasing, feel free, but in the interim, it has been reverted.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Proper references
Re: this edit, the fact that you found a random website doesn't mean that the random website is a reliable source. See WP:RS. We're not interested in what random websites say, we're only interested in what known, mainstream sources say. See WP:ICTF for a rough list of sites that are and are not considered reliable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)