User talk:Deboshree Bhowmick

June 2013
Your addition to RAK Ceramics has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Deboshree Bhowmick (talk)Sarah Jane greetings to you, this is Debashree from RAK Ceramics - kindly do not undo any changes further, as the info. as stated by your goodself is incomplete and incorrect. for authenticity verifications please visit the official website Deboshree Bhowmick (talk) 10:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The information you added is a copyright violation. Wikipedia cannot host copyrighted information not matter how correct or complete it is. The rules around this are very strict and as you have already recieved one warning, any further copyright violation will mean I will have to report you directly to the administrators any you may be blocked from editing. If you wish to update the article please do so in your own words. If you work for RAK ceramics please also read the guidelines about conflict of interest. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

thanks for you revert, you may report as you feel is appropriate, however without the consent of the company it is absolutely incorrect for any entity to post details with regards to official content. Deboshree Bhowmick (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * As an encylopedia, wikipedia and its editors can post "official content" about any entity it wants. We do not need consent of the company Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:18, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Very well, in that case DO NOT restrict when the rest of the 'editors' do so Deboshree Bhowmick (talk) 12:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I happened to see your note to Sarahj. She is entirely correct. As an administrator, let me tell you as plainly as possible that most of your additions to the article were entirely improper. Updating and correcting the history of the firm is appropriate in done correctly; addition of detailed material listing and praising  the products is  not, for it amount to advertising, and WP does not do that. (And in any case, previously published material can never be added), Furthermore, you in particular as a representative of the company should not be editing the article directly, but suggesting changes on the article talk page, where others will evaluate their suitability. In particular, I shall now incorporate those of your changes that seem appropriate. I am familiar with articles on companies, and I will help you get the most effective article possible that fits our guidelines.


 * If you wish to include information about the founders of the company, please provide a source for it not connected with the company. The same is true for financial and production data. I see the numbers in the Annual Report, and I can use them if necessary, but an outside source is preferable. The placeto providet his information is the talk page of the article. ' DGG ( talk ) 22:35, 4 July 2013 (UTC)