User talk:DebtMan

Welcome!

Hello, DebtMan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! L Kensington (talk • contribs) 04:19, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article General Juan N. Álvarez International Airport, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 20:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Hawk De Mexico for deletion
The article Hawk De Mexico is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hawk De Mexico until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Travelbird (talk) 10:10, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Template:Airports in Ontario, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You changed the template to "Airports in Mexico," which then cascaded to numerous articles where this template is used. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

HMCS Kootenay (DDE 258)
You keep adding information on the fate of HMCS Kootenay (DDE 258) in front of the citations. But the the information you keep adding is not backed up by the citations. If you have additional information, please can you add it after the citations, and provide a citation saying where you got this information from.--Toddy1 (talk) 13:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Italia Tour Airlines


A tag has been placed on Italia Tour Airlines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and give your reasons on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. De728631 (talk) 22:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating blatant hoax articles such as USS Proteus (CVL-1). I note that other articles you've created have been deleted as hoaxes or unverifiable and material you've added to articles has been removed as being falisfied, so this appears to be a long-running problem with your editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 09:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * For the benefit of any reviewing admins, I've been through this editor's military-related edits (which are the ones I'm most competent to spot problems with, and have found quite a few more additional hoaxes. This is definitely a long-running problem with this editor. Nick-D (talk) 10:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Air4 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ARTICLE NAME is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ARTICLE NAME until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --FoxyOrange (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Exact Air for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exact Air is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Exact Air until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)