User talk:Debuggercll

June 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Toto (dog). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blueboy96 19:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. VanTucky 22:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Daylight saving time, you will be blocked from editing. Confusing Manifestation 22:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Center for Science in the Pubic Interest
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Center for Science in the Pubic Interest, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Center for Science in the Pubic Interest is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Center for Science in the Pubic Interest, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Pubic Health
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pubic Health, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pubic Health is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pubic Health, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 11:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Center for Science in the Pubic Interest
A template has been added to the article Center for Science in the Pubic Interest, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with.

Russ michaels
The article Russ michaels has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 21:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)