User talk:DecaTilde/Archival Quality/January-Early May 2010

Hiroshi Takase
Hi, deaths listed in Recent deaths are intended for notable persons. Hiroshi Takase does not have a Wikipedia article and hence his notability has not been established. There is consensus (see here for example) that redlinks remain for one month after the death in case an article is written. You might consider writing a short stub article on Hiroshi Takase to confirm his notability? Regards, WWGB (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 03:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Nickelodeon logo's
W.G. | W.G.'s user talk    09:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

on your rename...
Yknow you should be calling yourself Nickeltooney, right? Less likelihood to have it rejected outright and gives near enough equal footing for each network. baa! radda  22:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I felt like giving myself a new name in the encyclopedia. I'm also planning to start a new channel on Livestream called "NickeloonDisney", though, as well as a new YouTube account with the same name. You should watch this video for details.
 * Nickel oon  Disney  18:42 27 March, 2010 (EDT)
 * Well done, didn't hear a word I said, did you? baa!  radda  00:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hm, your request was rejected... odd huh? baa!  radda  10:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I understand why.
 * Oh, well.<:)
 * L D E J R u f f  (see what I've contributed ) 16:22, 29 March 2010 (EDT)
 * L D <font color=Yellow>E <font color="LightGreen">J <font color="Green">R <font color="Blue">u <font color="DarkBlue">f <font color="Purple">f  <font color="Pink">(<font color="Pink">see what I've contributed ) 16:22, 29 March 2010 (EDT)

March 2010
Your uploaded image, Image:NickeloonDisney title.png, has been removed as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The logo is far too derivative of the Nickelodeon and Disney logos. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Licensing issue on File:LDEJRuff.jpg
You can tagged this image as being released under "GFDL and CC" as well as "public domain". This is not possible as the licenses contradict each other. Please correct the licensing information as soon as possible. Thanks! ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nick Movies logo 2010.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Nick Movies logo 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Nick Movies logo 2010.png
Thanks for uploading File:Nick Movies logo 2010.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 03:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Please note, this image also requires an appropriate non-free use rationale. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Logo-The Hub.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo-The Hub.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:00, 18 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 23:00, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Please be sure to include a fair use rationale. --AussieLegend (talk) 23:00, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History of video game consoles (eighth generation)


The article History of video game consoles (eighth generation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. See WP:CRYSTAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 08:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of History of video game consoles (eighth generation)
A tag has been placed on History of video game consoles (eighth generation), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 08:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of History of video game consoles (eighth generation)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is History of video game consoles (eighth generation). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/History of video game consoles (eighth generation) (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)