User talk:Decaudinc/sandbox

Article Evaluation Prisons in North Korea

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything is relevant. Nothing was distracting. The information was all relevant to the topic and how the fact that there are certain violations that the prisons have done publicly and in secret.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? The information goes from 2006 to 2017, since North Korea is secret there could be information that is old but in a way we do not know if anything is missing or if it is truly out of date.

What else could be improved? Part of why people who are not of the political agenda in prisons. The internment camps were solely based of political crimes but what other crimes could be committed that resort in citizens being forced into these prisons.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is sort of neutral. There is one account of interment camps for political crimes and reeducation caps and how a book was based off the events that happened there.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There is neither overrepresented or underrepresented, there is simple information that makes things simple and straight to the point on what goes on.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? A few links do not work. When they are not working there is a blank page or a man with a square saying that the page is not found. For those that do work there is important and relevant information that pertain to the article.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Each fact is referenced with the reliable link that may or may not work. The information is all gathered newspaper articles or reviewed material. Some of the articles are considered neutral unless you refer to the two accounts that have books related to them by those prisoners. The bias could possibly be here since the two books by those who were in the prisons/camps but there is not another person who back up what they have written.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The conversation behind the scenes of this would be that there is cruelty in the prison system in North Korea.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is rated C. It is part of the WikiProject Korea.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? From a class discussion much of the information is hypothetical. We can assume information. As for Wikipedia, there are sources that backup the information given and has been provided by a reference area.