User talk:Deda10944

Dude, come on!
We've been over this already, KurdoKardir. You need to go through the proper channels described at Standard offer for getting unbanned from Wikipedia. You can't just make seventeen unsubstantive edits to a bunch of articles before editing Kurdish cinema. Also, look at all the work that other editors have put into the page over the last few months, like, , , , and. They actually worked hard to improve it and you reverted it back to some idealized version that just doesn't work. Can you just try to go through the standard offer and then work with everyone? I'm here, so you can try to communicate and work this out.  BOTTO ( T • C ) 04:09, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Stop deleting and removing important content
It seem some Bot is targeting the Kurdish Cinema page on purpose to remove important content, such as info on the Kurdish Documentary Movement because it refers to Kurdistan Worker's Party (PKK), and the Kurdish fight with ISIS, the refugee issue, and the genocide Anfal Campaign. It is clearly Censorship. Why not add and correct info? Why remove everything as they have done many time? It make no sense that important information is deleted because I contribute to it, got banned, and came back to restore those info? I never removed anybody's input, only added important info, but because it was not to liking of some, not only the infos were removed, but I was banned. You can see, I care about this page, that a reason I want those info to be there. I only restored those important info, and the only way I know how to restore it, is to go back to the time before it was deleted and censored. Why cannot other contribute to the page without removing those info? You should look into that, not remove info or try to censor me and others.
 * You know that is flagrantly untrue. Half a dozen editors that I mentioned above from the Guild of Copyeditors worked on the page, adding new content, which you deleted. In fact, you deleted literally every edit made to the page since 2016. The section for "New Kurdish Documentary Movement" was cut and integrated into the History section because nobody could find literally any source to substantiate it. There is no censorship; there is simply the fact that nobody could find references for the claims you made in the article. Also, are you going to go through the standard offer? I'm the only person trying to give you a chance, but you need to show you can cooperate, before returning to Wikipedia.  BOTTO ( T • C ) 13:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

What is standard offer? You can look at the post and see the references to IMDB for each film mentioned in the New Kurdish Documentary Movement, you can read about the description of the films, they are about PKK, Kurdish Refugees, and Anfal. You claim that is not reference? What about all those Director's and other Film's mentioned, do they all have references? And you can add to that page anything that was removed by the revision, I would or nor anybody else will remove it, but when you remove the New Kurdish Documentary Movement, and then add others, is that not Censorship? I will add all the other's contribution back to the post, and I will not remove anything, because I do not believe in Censorship, it the others who remove contributions.


 * Standard offer means that you can approach a Wikipedia administrator, (like for example), amicably and peacefully, with the pretense that you'll work with other editors. I've been trying to tell you this since you raged at me last year and I gave you advice for how you could move forward. And, I am sincere; I looked very hard for references that address a new Kurdish documentary movement, yet I couldn't find any - then other editors, including Kurdish ones, tried to substantiate it, yet they couldn't find references either. I went to the Guild of Copyeditors so they could clean up the page and look for claims, but they couldn't find anything, either. So, please, if you can show me references that address the things that we can't find sources to, I'll happily add it. But, you really must go through the proper channels of the standard offer that I've linked for you. You are literally the only banned editor I've tried to advise with the standard offer, because I know you think you're helping, even if you're not actually doing so.  BOTTO ( T • C ) 21:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note that the key component to the Standard Offer is to stop socking, with zero block evasion for at least six months.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)