User talk:Dedhert.Jr/archive1

The following are the archive discussions in previous years. If you prefer to continue the discussion, please create it again on User talk:Dedhert.Jr and do not add to the archive.

Welcome!
Hi Dedhert.Jr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links you might find helpful:
 * How to edit a page
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * How to create your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia

Ask questions at the Teahouse or my talk. On talk pages, remember to sign your messages by typing a space then four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your message. That automatically inserts your user name and the date. Happy editing! Johnuniq (talk) 07:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Dedhert.Jr!


Happy New Year! Dedhert.Jr, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Borromean rings
@DocWatson42 Apologize for pinging you here. I have done some tests: multiple image on the right and left (along with clear). What I meant in the last paragraph is that if I put it on the left side remains completely fine for normal size; on the other hand, I considered that it will display the sandwiching images in your window. 

Meanwhile, putting on clear will give you ugly blank space, and putting on the right side, on the other hand, will push down the images, as you mentioned it before in your talk page. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 02:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm okay with the sandwiching (and the first option); for the record, the sandwiching starts happening at about 3400 pixels (two-thirds width of my display). —DocWatson42 (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @DocWatson42 Good. I will change it on the real article, putting it on the left side. Would you mind? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. MOS:RESOL prevents it. I think it's fine using gallery tag. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 02:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay. Oh, well (for you—my sympathies). :-/ —DocWatson42 (talk) 03:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of disproved mathematical ideas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

No target errors
Hi Dedhert.Jr. Thanks for your work tidy up citations. Can I suggest you turn on the error messages associated with sfn and harv templates? They are off by default, but Category:Harv and Sfn template errors shows how to turn them on. If you have any questions just ask. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @ActivelyDisinterested Hi. Thank you for the information. It happened as I was reading a page, and I wondered how is the error possible exist. Can you tell me why? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * This is about edits like this one, if you had the error messages on you would likely have noticed that Berkelamp and Conmway should be Berlekamp and Conway. Simple spelling mistakes, but because the error messages are off they are difficult to see. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @ActivelyDisinterested Weird. Mine is different than that. In the article Mobius–Kantor graph mentions the harvtxt error
 * "(Coxeter 1950) harv error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFCoxeter1950 (help)."
 * and I have no idea how to deal with this, even though I have read the category you linked above. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The templates create hyperlinks to a full cite, if there is no cite to link with you get a "no target error" but if there are multiple cites to link with you get a "multi-target error".
 * The issue with Mobius–Kantor graph is that the cite for "Coxeter 1950" appears as reference #4 and as the first cite in the References section.
 * Either the one in the Reference section should be removed, or reference #4 could be converted to use sfn. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @ActivelyDisinterested Thank you for suggestions. But I don't think it's a good idea either to change to sfn or remove the Reference section, as the article already use full citations. @David Eppstein, as the user who created the article, would you like to assist me? Sorry for pinging. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 12:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It makes extensive use of harvtxt templates in the article text. These require the cites that appear in the References section, so they can't be removed.
 * My point was that a cite should only appear once, but the "Coxeter 1950" cite appears twice (causing the error message). -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I changed it to use sfn. It had two inconsistent citation styles (inline full citations, and inline parenthetical citations in a deprecated format) combined with article text referring to full citations later, so the most consistent choice was to use sfn for the inline citations and keep the full citations later. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Square pyramid
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Square pyramid you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 18:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Ok, I've made a first pass through the article and made some suggestions. See Talk:Square pyramid/GA1. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @David Eppstein Thank you. I will try my best to improve them. And for some reason, this is my first GAN, and I'm actually surprised that you have picked this article to review in a moment. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 01:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I was surprised that I hadn't edited the article at all (significant contributors to articles are forbidden from reviewing them) but I try to review mathematics nominations when I can. Anyway, please ping me when you're ready for me to take another look at the article after your edits. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Got it. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 07:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Square pyramid
The article Square pyramid you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Square pyramid for comments about the article, and Talk:Square pyramid/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

About your first Good article
Congratulations! I've been following your progress on Square pyramid over the last few months and have seen the amount of work you've put into it; you should be proud of your accomplishment. I also believe I still owe you a copyedit on it. Even though David Eppstein went through and got all of the major points, I'll take a look myself and see if there isn't anything else I can do to help. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 09:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @TechnoSquirrel69 Thanks for some minor copyedit, and I can't do this without your assistance. Furthermore, thanks to @David Eppstein who reviewed this article until pass to GA. However, the current problem I have to deal with is my writing skills, and I definitely worry about the warning by WP:CIR. Does the fluency of writing actually include in that essay as well? I appreciate your answer as I might probably have some articles having the GA status (or maybe featured class). Dedhert.Jr (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Derivative
Derivative has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Derivative
Thanks for working on the Derivative article. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @XOR'easter Your welcome. I'm not an expert in this, anyway. Sadly, I haven't finished yet. I'm thinking about the definition part that states the usage of the limit concept, but it doesn't mention the analogous concept of the tangent line's slope and instantaneous rate of change. Also, is it possible to create subsections about that definition, including the limit and the hyperreal? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 07:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I was thinking myself about moving those two definitions together to avoid having a super-short section. So, I went ahead and did that. The idea that the derivative is the slope of the tangent line can probably go in the "As a limit" subsection. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @XOR'easter Looks better. But I didn't see it mentions the "instantaneous of rate" as well in the section of limit. Also, the definition by hyperreals remains lack of sources. I have looked up the sources yesterday, and it seems that I couldn't find them until nowadays. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 03:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Graph of triangular bipyramid.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Graph of triangular bipyramid.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Triangular bipyramid (symmetric net).svg
Thanks for uploading File:Triangular bipyramid (symmetric net).svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Chain of triangular bipyramid graph.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Chain of triangular bipyramid graph.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Parabolic subgroup of a reflection group
Hi Dedhert.Jr,

Since you tagged this as C-class, I was curious: in your opinion, in what ways does the article fall short of the B-class criteria? (I ask in the hope of planning further improvements.)

Thanks, JBL (talk) 20:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @JayBeeEll, thank you for the question. I'm not actually expert in group theory, but my opinion about this article is somewhat technical, and may not be understand by readers. The assessment of the article has already been covered by our assessment in WPM, or WP:QUALITY in general.
 * Also, does all of the articles about group theory is unavoidably extremely technical? If there is any mistake, please remind me. Thank you. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I figured technicality was the problem, but I wanted to check that there weren't any other major weak points I'd overlooked. The literature around reflection groups in general is tilted heavily towards professional mathematicians (or on the low end doctoral students in mathematics), it is only glancingly touched on in an undergraduate curriculum; and parabolic subgroups are not the most accessible part of the theory (though not the least either).  I think with more work I might be able to make this article largely accessible to, say, an undergraduate who has completed a course in group theory (an appropriate audience per WP:ONELEVELDOWN), but probably not much further than that.  Thanks for your input!  --JBL (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Square pyramid
Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)