User talk:DedicatedDataDiver

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article
 * Tutorial
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! Schazjmd  (talk)  13:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Repeated errors
In several of the articles that you edited, you introduced errors.
 * Please do not add manual numbers in brackets: ([1] or [1 <ref ). Properly formatted references are programmatically assigned reference numbers in the displayed article.
 * Don't add a space between the ending punctuation of a sentence and the reference tag.
 * For wikilinks with piped text, don't move the surname outside of the brackets so that only the first name is linked.
 * When an article uses the day-month-year format, don't change it to month-day-year (see WP:DATEVAR).
 * Also, there is no value in arbitrarily changing the assigned names of references.

It can take some time to get familiar with Wikipedia style, so don't be discouraged. I just wanted to let you know about the errors I noticed so that you can avoid them in future edits. Cheers! Schazjmd  (talk)  14:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to XMG Studio, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * what DedicatedDataDiver (talk) 10:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rezvani Beast. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Please read the messages on your talk page. You are repeating disruptive errors. Schazjmd   (talk)''  14:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Webjet, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Adakiko (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. — Manti  core  10:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)


 * but for what DedicatedDataDiver (talk) 10:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Please don't change date style and English variants without giving a valid explanation in the wp:edit summary. See wp:ENGVAR and MOS:DATES Adakiko (talk) 10:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * ok i will not repeat those mistakes again DedicatedDataDiver (talk) 10:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Please explain this edit. Why you have removed a reference and replaced it with the text [2]? This has happened repeatedly, and other editors are currently having to follow you around and correct your mistakes. — Manti  core  10:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)


 * See help:referencing for beginners. Adding the text "[2]" doesn't make a working citation. Suggest using help:notifications to alert people about your reply. Try . Beware, it's a bit tricky and editing a bad notification likely still won't send it. Adakiko (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Another bad edit
, you changed a citation to "[1]". That doesn't work. You also changed dates from D/M/Y format to M/D/Y format. e.g. "5 June 1966" to "June 5, 1966". India uses the former format. This is what is known as wp:disruptive editing Adakiko (talk) 10:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Suggestion
Read help:introduction. Avoid repeating mistakes. If you don't understand what the problem was, ask the person to explain further. You could also ask at the wp:Teahouse. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 11:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Higgins project, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.  Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 00:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Bodiadub. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. MER-C 16:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)