User talk:Dedinskish

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Dedinsky


A tag has been placed on Joseph Dedinsky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Ilyushka ☃  Talk!Contribs 11:37, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to August 19 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to August 19. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 09:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)