User talk:Dedokire

July 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Sro23 (talk) 18:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

For someone who wants to avoid drama, dragging someone to WP:ANI is about the most drama-inciting thing you could do. Several sockpuppets of banned users (such as this guy) have tried to do the same thing you did (reporting User:Jingiby), so it's no surprise we are suspicious of you. Also, if you are not active and do not plan on editing articles, then why do you care if you are blocked? You will not be unblocked unless you give examples of what kinds of edits you would make, otherwise, what's the point of unblocking you if you aren't even going to edit anything? Sro23 (talk) 16:47, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * What is the point of reporting someone then? What purpose does the reporting mechanism serve? Leaving the choices for the one reporting to either be absolutely 100% right or outright banned? It would've been helpful if there was a warning annotation to not report someone in threat of a ban or this wouldn't have happened in the first place. As far as I can tell, that user that you linked is Bulgarian and got banned because of a totally different topic with a couple of warnings beforehand and only after CheckUser confirmed that he was a sockpuppet, while I immediately got banned by simply under suspicion. As for your last question, I have a Computer Science degree, and have interests in heraldry, vexillology and 18th century Spring of Nations history, so I guess I will be contributing to those topics. Not to mention this is now being a textbook "guilty until proven innocent" situation... Dedokire (talk) 18:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You were not blocked for being "under suspicion", if you look at the block reason, it states you were blocked because you do not appear to be here to contribute to the encyclopedia. After years of inactivity, your first edit was to report someone you've had no interaction with before. Generally, that's not something people who are here to build an encyclopedia do. Sro23 (talk) 19:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Then why were the admins repeating it over and over again? Is there a specific rule that states to block not-so-active accounts that report other users that they think are doing something wrong? With all due respect, in the "not here to build an encyclopedia" page I am not seeing this rule being explicitly stated that warrants an indefinite ban. Dedokire (talk) 15:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)