User talk:DeeBee

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. pschemp | talk 02:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

What are you doing?
Twice I have had to revert your attempt to remove a photograph from the Cat article,  and twice I have had to remove your false attempt at placing the image for speedy deletion. 

A quick look at your user contribution list reveals that these are the only edits you have made. What's your beef? Dionyseus 02:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You do not have to revert my removal, you are doing it voluntarily against my wishes. My beef is that this image is not encyclopedic and should be deleted, and that the public domain claim is dubious, hence my wishes to see that it is deleted.  Do you have any other suggestions?  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DeeBee (talk • contribs).


 * Discussion can take place here or the talk page of the article. Please do not remove the image again. That is 3 times in a row now. pschemp | talk 02:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You are violating copyright law, do you want Wikipedia to be sued? Why are you illegally replacing this copyrighted image and placing the entire site in danger like this?  False warnings are going to be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DeeBee (talk • contribs).


 * The photo is homemade and its author has released all rights to it. Dionyseus 02:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

3RR
Read and follow WP:3RR or stop editing. Dionyseus 02:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Dionyseus 02:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)