User talk:DeeKenn

Proposal Notice
I am here to inform you that I have proposed that the page Power Tab should be merged into the Tablature page. See Talk:Power Tab Editor for more details. Bubble anonymous (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thank you for your input at Inland Empire (California). You might be interested in the Southern California WikiProject, a collaboration of editors to improve articles pertaining to Southern California.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! &mdash; B rien C lark Talk 03:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Dominic Ierace Error
I erroneously created a page. I misspelled the artist's name. How can it be removed? The page is Dominic Ireace. It should be Ierace, instead. (I already created the latter at Dominic Ierace).

It's just a redirect and, just perhaps, someone may misspell it like I did so maybe it doesn't need deletion.

Regardless, I'd like some input.
 * I've deleted the misspelled page for you :) --ST47 Talk&middot;Desk 21:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! DeeKenn 22:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * In the future, you can request that a page be speedily deleted by putting the appropriate tag at the top of it. See the Criteria for Speedy Deletion page for information on how and when to do this. --Runner5k 11:45, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

What a Fool Believes
Why? Pdfpdf 10:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 04:23, 30 July 2007 (hist) (diff) What a Fool Believes (→External link - Removed external link. Video pulled from YouTube.)


 * The editing description, I thought, said it all. The link pointed to a video from YouTube that is no longer there. I don't thinking linking to a video that is being reproduced without the appropriate rights is a good idea, also.DeeKenn 13:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

(I prefer to see both sides of the conversation in the same place.) Case closed? Pdfpdf 10:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The editing description only says the what, not the why. So no, it doesn't say it all.
 * I hadn't realised that it was no longer there. (It was there last time I looked ... ) So, OK, that in itself is a more than good enough reason to remove the link.
 * However, the editing description says: "Removed external link. Video pulled from YouTube"; i.e. this "explanation" doesn't say anything about the video not being there, or why is should be removed. So all I'm left with is your subsequent reply: "I don't thinking linking to a video that is being reproduced without the appropriate rights is a good idea". So, again, I would ask: "Why?". (However, as the video is no longer there, this is a somewhat academic question, and your answer won't make any difference to the situation, so it would seem somewhat pointless to ask.)

As I previously said, as far as I'm concerned, the "case" is "closed" - the fact that the video is no longer there is excellent justification for the edit you made.

However, it seemed to me that you were seeking a response from me. If so, I include one below. If not, just ignore what's below. Cheers, Pdfpdf 11:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn't ignore the below response. I'm glad I didn't.  I learned where I went wrong and now I know how not to do it again. Thank you! DeeKenn 11:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

-

''I prefer to see both sides of the conversation in the same place. See your talk page for my response.''


 * Well, how would I know if I got a message otherwise?

One way is to add the-page-in-question to your watchlist.


 * I need the notification at the top of the page. I do not visit people's talk pages unless summoned.

That's why I responded on your talk page rather than mine.


 * To address some of your points. You said:


 * However, the editing description says: "Removed external link. Video pulled from YouTube"; i.e. this "explanation" doesn't say anything about the video not being there, or why is should be removed. So all I'm left with is your subsequent reply: "I don't thinking linking to a video that is being reproduced without the appropriate rights is a good idea". So, again, I would ask: "Why?". (However, as the video is no longer there, this is a somewhat academic question, and your answer won't make any difference to the situation, so it would seem somewhat pointless to ask.)


 * The remark I left is more than enough, IMO.

If it were more than enough, then I wouldn't have felt the need to ask the question "Why?", would I. So clearly, it wasn't more than enough. Of course (in your opinion) you would think it's enough. If you didn't think it was enough, I expect that you would have said something different which you did think was enough. (Note that when you try to communicate with someone, if they don't understand what you mean, then you haven't communicated.)


 * "Video pulled from YouTube" means that it has been removed (aka "pulled") from YouTube.

I see. ("Pulled" means something quite different in England and Australia.)


 * Why was it removed? I have no idea.  If you want to contact the person who posted the video, or even YouTube, then feel free.


 * As to why posting links to copyrighted works is not a good idea, this should really be common sense and I'm sure is covered under some Wikipedia guideline.

Quoting one's sources frequently involves posting a link to a copyrighted work, so I don't see why this "should be common sense".


 * Furthermore, YouTube links are transient in nature. Posting a link to one is pointless as a resource as it is destined to change at some point.

I see. (By-the-way: I wasn't the one who posted the link. And "Engineer Bob" is pretty hot on these sort of things, so when he left it there, I assumed it was OK.)


 * I hope that clarifies some issues you seem to be having.

Yes thank you.


 * Please direct any further comments to my talk page so that I know you have responded.

All of my comments have been placed on your talk page; I haven't put any of my comments on my talk page (except one which said "See your talk page for my response.")


 * DeeKenn 13:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

-

Francis Julius LeMoyne
Hi, I've nominated an article you worked on, Francis Julius LeMoyne, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know where you can improve it if you see fit. Great job getting this article started! --Midnightdreary 13:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your contributions! I can't wait to see it on the DYK page if it makes it. I find it a very interesting tidbit of American history.DeeKenn 15:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

IE article
Yeah, I think too many people were letting "good-faith" assumptions take precedence over quality of contributions, or they weren't paying attention. Anyway, I suspect he'll be be back as le909 or some other account soon. I'll keep an eye out. Amerique dialectics 02:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Got him for double voting on an IFD: User:Ie909. All his accounts are banned now. Amerique dialectics 22:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

belize
Funny, I was thinking the same thing of you: three "fact" tags in a single sentence needs a bit of chilling. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 21:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

ISKCON 1977
Hello DeeKenn, I was trying to improve the wording on the sentence, and have changed it again now to be more technically accurate as well as reading ok. Thanks for pointing it out. Best wishes, Gouranga(UK) (talk) 10:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Bipolar Disorder
I didn't realize that I originally pasted the "tarnation" disambiguation page. I meant to re-add the link for the documentary by the same name. It's fixed now. Thanks E_dog95'   Hi ' 02:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries then...problem solved. JRDarby didn't think it was a good fit either. E_dog95'   Hi ' 15:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

ISKCON work group or subproject?
Hello. I see you have made contributions to ISKCON related articles. If you are interested, there is a discussion concerning an ISKCON subproject located at, ISKCON work group or subproject. Any thoughts you have would be appreciated. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 16:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Deekenn.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Deekenn.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 19:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Help with AfD
Help

I tried to create an AfD for an article which was proposed once before. The pages were not automagically created. I goofed somehwere. DeeKenn (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You have to create the page. To do so, click on the red afd link in the article. Cut-and-paste the template in step 2 on the instructions shown in the afd box. (Note that you're creating the 2nd nomination). OhNo itsJamie  Talk 15:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi there, the page is accessible here. Hope this helps! The   Helpful   One  (Review) 17:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem at all! The   Helpful   One  (Review) 17:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Would you like to add another tradition to the list
{| class="navbox collapsible" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em; -moz-border-radius: 9px;" ! style="background-color: orange; text-align: center;-moz-border-radius: 9px;"|Invitation to create a Krishna centered Hinduism project {| Proposed project - Krishna worshipers WikiProject DeeKenn - its your invitation - lets create unity in diversity! Proposal for discussion - May 2008 Please, deekenn, say what you think about it:
 * style="border: solid 3px orange; -moz-border-radius: 9px;" |
 * style="border: solid 3px orange; -moz-border-radius: 9px;" |
 * colspan="3" valign="middle" style="width: 60%; border: 0.5px #778899 solid; padding: 1em; background: #6495ED; -moz-border-radius: 9px;" |
 * valign="top" style="border: 0.5px #778899 solid; padding: 1em; width: 100%;-moz-border-radius: 9px; " |
 * valign="top" style="border: 0.5px #778899 solid; padding: 1em; width: 100%;-moz-border-radius: 9px; " |


 * Just a few words... what may interest you and attract other editors across a wider spectrum of Krishna-centered or connected traditions in Hinduism?
 * Go on over to our new project discussion page Talk:Krishna/Krishna worshipers. We need to talk it over!
 * Look over the complete list of proposed traditions forming the scope of the project - this list is by far not complete, please add your favorites and discuss!

From ancient to modern You can join and make a difference! This is an informal invitation to join a joint cross boundary venture. You and your friends are invited to discuss and comment on the proposal of new Krishna centered project. There are many traditions where Krishna is worshiped and His names revered. Lets join the forces and create more of the beautiful and well resourced articles on all related subjects and traditions. The traditions are not limited to one or two, there are many and all should be given equal attention by us. Drop me a few words or lets discuss it at the discussion page. Wikidās ॐ 21:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Please discuss it here. Wikidās ॐ 22:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi There!
It seems that you are intrested in the Inland Empire (California) area. Please see WikiProject Inland Empire and join if you like. It is a newly formed wikiproject that I just created so please cheak it out. Any questions contact me! Thank-You House1090 (talk) 03:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Your note at Talk:Washington, Pennsylvania
Back in 2007 you asked What, no mention of Shorty's? God I miss those dogs... at Talk:Washington, Pennsylvania. Well sir, I present to you: Shorty's Lunch. --GrapedApe (talk) 02:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Digital Audio Workstation with speakers.jpg


The file File:Digital Audio Workstation with speakers.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)