User talk:Dee Snots

August 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to User talk:Izno, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 07:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Are you familiar with Dee? Dee Snots (talk) 07:13, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Note your reply will be automatically signed with your username. By saving changes, you agree to the Terms of Use and agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL licenses. Dee Snots (talk) 07:20, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Pursuit of Happyness. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ItsSkV08 (talk) 07:27, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

@ItsSkV08 Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Pursuit of Happyness. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards. If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Dee Snots (talk) 07:29, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1916 Edmonton municipal election, you may be blocked from editing. Rdp060707&#124;talk 07:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

I win all discussions because I am calm
You cannot and will not win an argument with me because of how calm I am and everyone who edits Wikipedia as a hobby and has over 50 edits is an embarrassment and has no life😌 Dee Snots (talk) 07:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:ItsSkV08. Serols (talk) 07:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

What did i do Dee Snots (talk) 07:33, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Stop harassing me
Stop leaving harassment in my talk Dee Snots (talk) 07:33, 1 August 2021 (UTC)  You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 07:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)