User talk:Deebs90

Welcome!
Hello, Deebs90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle  Faddle  09:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Interlude (Interactive Video) (August 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Deebs90 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joe_Decker&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Deebs90 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e deckertalk 16:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interlude (Interactive Video) (October 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interlude (Interactive Video) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Deebs90 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timtrent&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Deebs90 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle  Faddle  09:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Fiddle  Faddle  22:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:JaneR Tribeca.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JaneR Tribeca.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interlude (Interactive Video) (January 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interlude (Interactive Video) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Deebs90 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Primefac&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Deebs90 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, Deebs90
 * I see you waited 6 weeks for a review, after spending months on the Draft, and trying to follow the first turn away's recommendation in a prima facie way, but the language used doesn't actually have it's common sense meaning, it's being used technically. Sorry. I'm not sure if the subsequent technical explanation of why it was not advanced made full sense to you either, but let's not stir up things. I think I can help a bit, and I've started some edits. There are is also wp:article rescue squadron and a number of other resources that can be called on if you need. I need to take a break now, but I'll get back to it later, although I have other things going on as well. FeatherPluma (talk) 22:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * NYT and Israel Times have the type of sourcing being sought, and have been cited. Informally, and with promising anything, I think with a bit more effort it will meet / exceed the guidelines. FeatherPluma (talk) 04:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interlude (interactive video) (July 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interlude (interactive video) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Interlude_(interactive_video) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Flat_Out&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Interlude_(interactive_video) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 04:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I am going to come back to your article within the next day or two and clean it up so it is ready to advance to mainspace. FeatherPluma (talk) 00:37, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * OK, by breaking it down, it's a big mess right now, but I am sure it will come together nicely on the flip side. Think Property Brothers, or some such. FeatherPluma (talk) 04:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I followed the AfC recommendations, step by step. I trimmed from 16683 bytes to 12760 bytes, some of which is hidden text, that can probably be removed. Having extensively followed the reviewers' suggestions, rather than submitting through another AfC review, I advanced the article to mainspace as it now seems reasonable for dissemination. This will also avail it of a greater use pool for any upgrading needed. Because I sidestepped further AfC input, I hatted the text as a new article, for procedural transparency and also to promote review. If you have a moment, please check that I did not inadvertently introduce errors in my modifications. Please also make any changes or improvements you like. If you have time, I would like to hear your feedback on the present formulation of the article. Regards. FeatherPluma (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)