User talk:Deeda06

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Bernard Stone. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornix talk  21:09, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bernard Stone, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bernard Stone was changed by Deeda06 (u) (t) deleting 9103 characters on 2010-11-30T06:58:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Deeda06, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hugh (talk) 04:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your interest in the Wikipedia article on Bernard Stone.

Please restrict your edits to one section at a time as much as by using the closest edit control rather than always editing the entire page at once. Thank you.

Please add content rather than delete content with an edit summary of "incomplete." Wikipedia will always be incomplete. Thank you.

Please familiarize yourself with the neutral point of view WP:NPOV policy and the reliable sources policy WP:RS. Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Thank you.

Also, you may benefit from reviewing What Wikipedia is Not WP:NOT and in particular the section WP:SOAP. Hugh (talk) 04:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you again for your intense interest in the Wikipedia article on Bernard Stone.

You may benefit from understanding the definition of a reliable source WP:RS and in particular the importance of secondary sources to Wikipedia WP:SOURCES and the policy on original research WP:NOR. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 05:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

For something to be considered a notable accomplishment of the subject of a biographical article on WP an editor really needs to find a reliable secondary source reference. Hugh (talk) 07:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)