User talk:Deejayteelow

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cherry Pit (band) (February 20)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cherry_Pit_(band) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references. Do not resubmit this draft without references.

Portions of this draft have a breezy informal tone that is inappropriate for Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is not here to publicize a non-notable band.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Cherry pit. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:39, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cedarville, Ohio, you may be blocked from editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Cherry. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 23:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)


 * hmm.... I was about to remove the AIV report, when I edit conflicted with the bot saying the user was blocked. All three escalating warnings - indeed, all posts to this talk page - were made after the user's last edit.  What is the point of leaving level 2, level 3, and level 4 warnings in rapid succession, with zero edits by the user in between? --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)