User talk:DeepFriedWaffles

January 2021
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to DeLorean time machine. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. ComplexRational (talk) 19:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -BriLila (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mfield (Oi!) 22:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * I did realize, even at the time of vandalizing, that it was wrong. You are completely right. I understand what I was doing was completely uncalled for, annoying, and just plain childish of me. That's why Mfield blocked me. Mfield was protecting Wikipedia from my vandalism, and rightfully so. People that do what I did should not be welcome to edit Wikipedia. However, after reading the [|Wikipedia's blocking policy], I learned that blocks are not punishments. They are a way of protecting the Wikipedia project and reduce future problems. Wikipedia admins and volunteers have a job to do; to make sure that Wikipedia is accurate and free of vandalism so everybody can use the site without problems, so they block in good faith. That's why I no longer want to vandalize Wikipedia. Wikipedia is made out of volunteers who take so much time to scour Wikipedia for inaccurate information, missing information, but most importantly, the people who vandalize Wikipedia in order to ruin it. The most amazing part is that these people do all of these things without even getting paid! They do it all because they believe in Wikipedia. All in all, I feel like a total jerk for vandalizing Wikipedia, especially because our volunteers took the time to fix what I broke, and the vandalism I made was very offensive. I do believe that I should be given a second chance. And this time, I will be responsible and edit to help, not harm. However, if I am not unblocked, I completely understand why.DeepFriedWaffles (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Posting that someone died when they didn't is indeed a very serious matter and may have caused that person difficulty. What edits do you wish to make if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 08:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes. I am aware that my edits about CallMeCarson [|CallMeCarson dying] and my vandalism about [|Satya Rhodes-Conway] were very offensive, rude, and annoying, and I pledge to not vandalize Wikipedia again. I do not want to offend anyone or annoy any of Wikipedia's readers any longer. If anything, I want to help combat it now, and that is what I want to start editing for. I want to help reduce vandalism. Perhaps I can use the Special:RecentChanges page to see new changes on Wikipedia. If they are acts of vandalism, I can help remove them. Now, I know it can be hard to believe someone over the Internet that you have never met. All I can say is that I know my block was done in good faith and completely justified, and I deserved it, 100%. I am sorry for my acts of vandalism, and I have learned from my mistakes. Even if I am not given the second chance, thank you anyway for protecting Wikipedia from vandals. --DeepFriedWaffles (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)