User talk:Deepaktharu55

Welcome!
Hello, Deepaktharu55, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Deepaktharu55, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Annh07 (talk) 11:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Deepaktharu55


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Deepaktharu55 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Annh07 (talk) 11:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 11:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Dementia caregiving. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Seawolf35 (talk) 05:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Deepaktharu55 (talk) 11:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello there,
 * I hope this message finds you well. I understand the immense responsibility Wikipedia admins carry in ensuring the quality and accuracy of information on the platform. However, I'd like to offer some insights and reasons for reconsidering the speedy deletion of the article in question:
 * Genuine Effort: This article represents genuine effort and research. While it might not be perfect, I believe it has the potential to be a valuable resource for readers.
 * Growth Over Time: Like many articles in their early stages, this one needs time to grow and evolve. With constructive feedback, I'm confident it can be shaped into a comprehensive and informative piece.
 * Recent Improvements: I've recently made edits addressing some of the initial concerns, and I'd appreciate a bit more time to continue refining it.
 * Cultural Context: The subject may have nuances or significance within certain cultural or regional contexts that might not be immediately evident. It's essential to consider diverse perspectives and the broader impact on the global Wikipedia audience.
 * Commitment to Collaborate: I'm eager to collaborate, gather more sources, and ensure the article meets Wikipedia's standards. A dialogue or guidance on how to enhance the article would be immensely beneficial.
 * Passion for the Topic: This topic is close to my heart, and I believe it holds value for many others. By working together, we can ensure that it's presented in the best possible way on Wikipedia.
 * Thank you for taking the time to consider this appeal. I truly respect the work you do and am hopeful for a positive resolution. Let's work together to make Wikipedia an even more informative and inclusive space!
 * Warm regards,
 * Deepak Tharu Deepaktharu55 (talk) 11:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello there,

I hope this message finds you well. I understand the immense responsibility Wikipedia admins carry in ensuring the quality and accuracy of information on the platform. However, I'd like to offer some insights and reasons for reconsidering the speedy deletion of the article in question:

Genuine Effort: This article represents genuine effort and research. While it might not be perfect, I believe it has the potential to be a valuable resource for readers.

Growth Over Time: Like many articles in their early stages, this one needs time to grow and evolve. With constructive feedback, I'm confident it can be shaped into a comprehensive and informative piece.

Recent Improvements: I've recently made edits addressing some of the initial concerns, and I'd appreciate a bit more time to continue refining it.

Cultural Context: The subject may have nuances or significance within certain cultural or regional contexts that might not be immediately evident. It's essential to consider diverse perspectives and the broader impact on the global Wikipedia audience.

Commitment to Collaborate: I'm eager to collaborate, gather more sources, and ensure the article meets Wikipedia's standards. A dialogue or guidance on how to enhance the article would be immensely beneficial.

Passion for the Topic: This topic is close to my heart, and I believe it holds value for many others. By working together, we can ensure that it's presented in the best possible way on Wikipedia.

Thank you for taking the time to consider this appeal. I truly respect the work you do and am hopeful for a positive resolution. Let's work together to make Wikipedia an even more informative and inclusive space!

Warm regards, Deepak Tharu

September 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:26, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Sir/Maam,
 * Thank you for notifying me about the block. I genuinely apologize if any of my edits came across as promotional or advertising. My intention was to share information about a notable topic/individual/organization that I believed was relevant to Wikipedia.
 * If I've inadvertently violated Wikipedia's guidelines, I'd appreciate guidance on how to make appropriate contributions in the future. I value the Wikipedia community and its mission, and I'm committed to ensuring that my future edits align with Wikipedia's standards.
 * Please consider my appeal, and I'd be grateful for any feedback or advice you can provide.
 * Sincerely,
 * Deepak Tharu Deepaktharu55 (talk) 06:46, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * (not an admin) If you want to be unblocked, you will need to place the, template on your talk page as demonstrated on the block notification. Seawolf35 (talk) 06:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Deepaktharu55 (talk) 06:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)