User talk:Deepblug

Removal of sourced content
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Grandes écoles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The fact that you don't happen to agree with the ranking that has been used in the article for years is not a reason to remove it. You're welcome to use the talk page of the article to discuss if you feel there's a reason to disregard the ranking (though it is by far the most prestigious in Europe).Jeppiz (talk) 19:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. The warning applies to you, the person, regardless of what account you're using. Using WP:SOCKS to push your POV is not allowed.Jeppiz (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)