User talk:Deepfock

Nomination of Transit of bird for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transit of bird is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Transit of bird until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mogism (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

March 2019
Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page PU. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should: Thank you. LiberatorG (talk) 07:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
 * Only add a " red link " if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Don Francis. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. LiberatorG (talk) 07:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)