User talk:Deepkatiwari.xyz001

March 2013
Hello, I'm Dawn Bard. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Search engine marketing, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Advertising agency. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 23:00, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest policy
Hello, Deepkatiwari.xyz001. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you should consider our guidance on Conflicts of interest and take a look at the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 06:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deepak Tiwari. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''First, it is not appropriate to remove all the text in an existing Wikipedia article and replace it with text about a different topic. Second, please do not attempt to create an article about yourself again. bonadea'' contributions talk 06:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Courtsey notice
Your editing is being discussed here. Please consider joining the discussion. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 23:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Please respond
This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Ronz (talk) 16:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)