User talk:DeeptiKhosla

Welcome!
Hello, DeeptiKhosla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Amitabh Bachchan
I have reverted your contribution to Amitabh Bachchan. Right now, I do not have the time to check but it seems familiar to me and thus it may previously have been removed from the article due to concerns raised on the talk page. If I am wrong then I apologise but this is a biography of a living person and we need to exercise particular care. Although it appeared to be reasonably sourced, some of the phrasing was odd - eg: "In 2011 Amitabh Bachchan found himself in the news for all the wrong reasons" - and it looked distinctly unbalanced. We also try to avoid allegations that turn out to be unfounded, however much they may have been reported at the time. I suggest that you discuss the material that you wish to add on the article talk page. Sorry if you think that I am being harsh but another few days' wait while discussions take place will not diminish the article in any significant manner. It is, after all, not a new revelation. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 17:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I have reverted you again and opened a discussion at Talk:Amitabh Bachchan. - Sitush (talk) 17:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Your recent editing history at Amitabh Bachchan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 17:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Stop it now, please. You have made exactly 10 edits elsewhere and then moved in to the semi-protected Amitabh Bachchan article with some controversial content that you have now reinstated three times despite being asked to discuss it. The pattern of your contributions is concerning, let alone the content itself. I shall revert you once more and please, please discuss your addition at Talk:Amitabh Bachchan. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 17:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amitabh bachchan Controversies


A tag has been placed on Amitabh bachchan Controversies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Can be merged with article in question

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions  16:33, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Amitabh Bachchan Sikh riots for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amitabh Bachchan Sikh riots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amitabh Bachchan Sikh riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC)