User talk:Definatly Not Anonymous

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Idolatry in Sikhism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Idolatry in Sikhism was changed by Definatly Not Anonymous (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955877 on 2020-10-05T11:07:36+00:00

Welcome
Hello Definatly Not Anonymous and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to First Anglo-Sikh War, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 06:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of First Anglo-Akali War


A tag has been placed on First Anglo-Akali War requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://sikhunity.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/the-lost-battle/, http://www.jathashaheedan.com/blog/index.php?/archives/P6.html, and https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Akali_Phula_Singh. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Grey joy talk 07:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of First Anglo-Ghadar War for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First Anglo-Ghadar War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/First Anglo-Ghadar War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at September 11 attacks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources. ''Please do not add unreferenced material that is not directly affected with the September 11 attacks page. Thank you.'' David J Johnson (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of battles involving the Sikh Empire, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 06:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Battle of Saraighat. Materialscientist (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. RegentsPark (comment) 15:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * FYI, your next block will likely be WP:NOTHERE. Keep that in mind when you return. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Given that your first edit after this block was a massive unsourced copyright violation, I've disabled this account until you can communicate with us. 12:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Definatly Not Anonymous. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   09:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anglo-Kuka Wars


Hello, Definatly Not Anonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anglo-Kuka Wars".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)