User talk:Deftsoft1

June 2024
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Secretlondon (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I understand my fault in inserting a promotional link to the ‘dApps’ article. My fault was to add a blog link. I should have leveraged another reliable, non-promotional link to support the citations in the article. I’d also ensure that I make edits that enhance the credibility and authority of an article and curb adding dubious links to the articles. Deftsoft1 (talk) 13:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Deftsoft1 (talk) 10:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC) I understand my fault in inserting a promotional link to the ‘dApps’ article. I should have leveraged another reliable, non-promotional link to support the citations in the article. I’d also ensure that I make edits that enhance the credibility and authority of an article and curb adding dubious links to the articles.