User talk:Degenavelos

October 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at English people, you may be blocked from editing. Mutt Lunker (talk) 08:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC) Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on English people. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 12:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC) Please read the bold, revert, discuss cycle very carefully. We obtain WP:CONSENSUS on edits by discussion on the article talkpage, not by force ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 12:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)