User talk:Dehaw

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dehaw/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Dehaw/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 15:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing this website, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see WP:NOT for further details). Thank you. Jac 16888 Talk 12:19, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 06:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I have also taken the liberty of removing the spam links and other nonsensical content you have posted on this talk page. -- Kinu  t/c 06:59, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for blocking this user, as they have been sending gibberish e-mails to me over the past two days, since I warned them, asking me to help them, but not telling me with what. They even said that they love me and that we're now good friends, which is a bit extreme for e-mails. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 14:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Wow, that is beyond bizarre. I have revoked this user's e-mail ability as well. Thanks for the note. -- Kinu  t/c 14:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hopefully that is the end to it, but this self-promotion without explaining why their "theories" are relevant has been what has been most annoying. Thanks for doing that, though! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)